GNU and Linux: Different or the same?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers GNU and Linux: Different or the same?
# 15  
Old 06-20-2003
Yes, now you have it!

It 's all play on the irony of commercial interests in a world of open ideas and concepts.

This site is not Unix either, it is the UNiversal Internet eXchange.
# 16  
Old 10-22-2003
So does this mean that linux cannot exist on it's own without the GNU system? It sounds like you cannot have the linux OS without gnu. Gnu being the system, meaning the actuall programs and what not, it seems you would not be able to do anything with the linux kernal without it.

And above someone said gnu is what give you ls, cd, mkdir, etc. I thought it was bash and all the other shells that gave you those functions.

sorry, i am still trying to learn Smilie

Last edited by Minnesota Red; 10-22-2003 at 01:34 AM..
# 17  
Old 10-22-2003
Quote:
Originally posted by Minnesota Red
And above someone said gnu is what give you ls, cd, mkdir, etc. I thought it was bash and all the other shells that gave you those functions.

sorry, i am still trying to learn Smilie
BASH is a GNU product.

from 'bash --help'

"GNU bash, version 2.05b.0(1)-release-(i586-suse-linux)"
# 18  
Old 10-22-2003
Quote:
Originally posted by Minnesota Red
So does this mean that linux cannot exist on it's own without the GNU system? It sounds like you cannot have the linux OS without gnu. Gnu being the system, meaning the actuall programs and what not, it seems you would not be able to do anything with the linux kernal without it.

Yes, it could exist, but you would have to build an entire supporting environment. No, it cannot exist because the GNU environment is currently how Linux is supported Smilie

So, since Linux is built on GNU and no one has built another supporting environment, GNU is the Linux supporting environment. If people build an entire supporting environment that was not GNU, then the situation would be different. But the situation is what is it..........
# 19  
Old 10-22-2003
Ah okay I understand my friend Smilie. And I now agree with stallman, that OS's like red hat should infact be called gnu/linux.
 
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support

Read *.accdb files in GNU/Linux

Hi Guys, Can you please suggest me to read the *.accdb files under linux enviornment? I have google a bit. There is some solution to convert the *.accdb files under windows environment. But I am trying to do it in Linux environment. Please provide your thoughts. Thanks, Ranga :) (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: rangarasan
3 Replies

2. Fedora

FreeBSD or GNU/Linux?

Hi, i'm working on micro$oft windows based networking environment's. i want learn other os than micro$oft windows. i tested FreeBSD & Gnu/Linux (Fedora). both are similar. which of following is best choice for me? for networking? and which of them has future (for e.g not discontinued after 2... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: skynet_boy
3 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question