Insertion of Leap Second


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Insertion of Leap Second
Prev   Next
# 1  
Old 12-28-2005
Insertion of Leap Second

Hi All,

We are running the HP-UX 11.11 and Linux AS 3.0. so, shall we need to make any changes for leap second i.e. insert the leap second on 1st Jan 2006 or does the system have some setup which would take care of this automatically.

Please advise.

Regards,
Inder
 
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Leap second for year 2015

I hear the Leap second for 2015 will occur on June 30 at 23:59:60 according to the wild rumours from internet the expected impact ranges from crashing to hanging servers. Can anybody share their preparations what they have done for solaris servers? are there any patches to install or workaround?... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sparcguy
1 Replies

2. Fedora

Leap second happening

Have anybody heard about the Leap second problem Leap second :A leap second is a one-second adjustment that is occasionally applied to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) in order to keep its time of day close to the mean solar time. How could i avoid such thing in my script which i deal with... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: wnaguib
6 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

unix korn shell leap years problem

Write a function called dateToDays that takes three parameters -a month string such as Sep, a day number such as 18, and a year number such as 1962-and return s the number of days from January 1, 1900, to the date. Notes: I am asking you to account for leap years. my script is not... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: babuda0059
0 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Number of leap seconds

Is there a function call in std library or unit command that returns the number of current leap seconds? GG (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: NAVTime
4 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Leap year K-shell script

I need a k-shell script that tests for leap-year. Does anyone have one at hand, need ASAP!!! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: p1jls02
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

leap seconds and the stdc library

I understand the NTP protocol, so keeping system time updated is not a problem. Standard C library routines like localtime() take a number of UTC seconds elapsed since the start of the epoch (Jan 1, 1970). These times in seconds can be a filetime, system time, or some other time in the past or... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jim mcnamara
1 Replies

7. HP-UX

Leap Second

Hi All, We are running the HP-UX 11.11 and Linux AS 3.0. so, shall we need to make any changes for leap second i.e. insert the leap second on 1st Jan 2006 or does the system have some setup which would take care of this automatically. Please advise. Regards, Inder (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: isingh786
1 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
TIME2POSIX(3)						   BSD Library Functions Manual 					     TIME2POSIX(3)

NAME
time2posix, posix2time -- convert seconds since the Epoch LIBRARY
Standard C Library (libc, -lc) SYNOPSIS
#include <time.h> time_t time2posix(time_t t); time_t posix2time(time_t t); DESCRIPTION
IEEE Std 1003.1-1988 (``POSIX.1'') legislates that a time_t value of 536457599 shall correspond to "Wed Dec 31 23:59:59 GMT 1986." This effectively implies that POSIX time_t's cannot include leap seconds and, therefore, that the system time must be adjusted as each leap occurs. If the time package is configured with leap-second support enabled, however, no such adjustment is needed and time_t values continue to increase over leap events (as a true `seconds since...' value). This means that these values will differ from those required by POSIX by the net number of leap seconds inserted since the Epoch. Typically this is not a problem as the type time_t is intended to be (mostly) opaque--time_t values should only be obtained-from and passed- to functions such as time(3), localtime(3), mktime(3) and difftime(3). However, IEEE Std 1003.1-1988 (``POSIX.1'') gives an arithmetic expression for directly computing a time_t value from a given date/time, and the same relationship is assumed by some (usually older) appli- cations. Any programs creating/dissecting time_t's using such a relationship will typically not handle intervals over leap seconds cor- rectly. The time2posix() and posix2time() functions are provided to address this time_t mismatch by converting between local time_t values and their POSIX equivalents. This is done by accounting for the number of time-base changes that would have taken place on a POSIX system as leap sec- onds were inserted or deleted. These converted values can then be used in lieu of correcting the older applications, or when communicating with POSIX-compliant systems. The time2posix() function is single-valued. That is, every local time_t corresponds to a single POSIX time_t. The posix2time() function is less well-behaved: for a positive leap second hit the result is not unique, and for a negative leap second hit the corresponding POSIX time_t does not exist so an adjacent value is returned. Both of these are good indicators of the inferiority of the POSIX representation. The following table summarizes the relationship between time_t and its conversion to, and back from, the POSIX representation over the leap second inserted at the end of June, 1993. DATE TIME T X=time2posix(T) posix2time(X) 93/06/30 23:59:59 A+0 B+0 A+0 93/06/30 23:59:60 A+1 B+1 A+1 or A+2 93/07/01 00:00:00 A+2 B+1 A+1 or A+2 93/07/01 00:00:01 A+3 B+2 A+3 A leap second deletion would look like... DATE TIME T X=time2posix(T) posix2time(X) ??/06/30 23:59:58 A+0 B+0 A+0 ??/07/01 00:00:00 A+1 B+2 A+1 ??/07/01 00:00:01 A+2 B+3 A+2 [Note: posix2time(B+1) => A+0 or A+1] If leap-second support is not enabled, local time_t's and POSIX time_t's are equivalent, and both time2posix() and posix2time() degenerate to the identity function. SEE ALSO
difftime(3), localtime(3), mktime(3), time(3) BSD
September 11, 2005 BSD