Separated hard disks for Operating System and applications - better IO performance ?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Separated hard disks for Operating System and applications - better IO performance ?
# 1  
Old 10-12-2010
Separated hard disks for Operating System and applications - better IO performance ?

Dear all,

I would like to ask if there are any positive effects from having a dedicated hard disk for the operating system.

The scenario would be to have a dedicated disk for the OS and a dedicated disk for the applications.

Do you see any advantages in such a configuration such as better IO performance ?
If the applications use primarily ""disk 2" for IO would that have a noticeable positive effect?

Thanks in advance,
Petros
# 2  
Old 10-12-2010
I don't think it matters on most applications.

If you describe the details of your application, people can give a more appropriate response.
This User Gave Thanks to Neo For This Post:
# 3  
Old 10-12-2010
I set up systems with the OS on drive 0 and the application and data on drive 1.
Even with RAID, I set up logical drive 0 with the first two spindles, and then use the rest for data.
The biggest advantage is ease of creating a standby machine.
Performance will depend on how well you can balance the IO between disks.
This User Gave Thanks to jgt For This Post:
# 4  
Old 10-12-2010
Thanks for your replies,

This is not for a specific application in mind.
I want to see if this is a best-practice I have missed, or if this does not
really have an effect in applications that do not have demanding disk I/O requirements.

To me it would sound logical if an application has specific performance requirements
and heavy disk I/O, a busy database for example, to have its own disk.

I see the advantage in having the OS / Applications in different physical disks, from the management perspective (creating a standby machine, swapping disks for the application, ...)

but does the OS on its own really need a significant amount of I/O access to the disk? I would guess not.
# 5  
Old 10-12-2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by petrospis
To me it would sound logical if an application has specific performance requirements and heavy disk I/O, a busy database for example, to have its own disk.
If there's significant competition, this would make sense. If there's significant competition, though. That's a big "if".
Quote:
but does the OS on its own really need a significant amount of I/O access to the disk? I would guess not.
Generally not.
This User Gave Thanks to Corona688 For This Post:
# 6  
Old 10-13-2010
I just checked a system, that has 43 signed on users running a call centre application.
Code:
HP Proliant, Drive 0 = 2 disks RAID1                                           
             Drive 1 = 6 disks RAID10                                          
                                                                               
10:45:49 device             MB     %busy   avque   r+w/s  blks/s   avwait  avserv 
Average  c0b0t0d0p1s2    29966        5      8.6     13      155      32.5     4.3 
Average  c0b0t0d0p1      34699        5      8.6     13      155      32.5     4.3 
Average  c0b0t1d0p1s0    19531        0      1.4      0        0       2.1     5.7 
Average  c0b0t1d0p1s1    39062        2      2.4      7       93       5.2     3.6 
Average  c0b0t1d0p1s2   151323        2      2.5      5      102       5.9     4.0 
Average  c0b0t1d0p1     209924        3      3.1     13      196       6.3     3.0

Surprisingly the root file system is the busiest.

Last edited by jgt; 10-13-2010 at 11:59 AM.. Reason: align columns
# 7  
Old 10-13-2010
This is indeed interesting.
Does the application strictly use disk 1 for its disk I/O ?

There seems to be lots of activity on disk 0 which is directly or indirectly caused by the application.

In the case it does it indicetly, it would be interesting to see where this disk I/O originates.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

How to reclaim hard disks and IP's in AIX?

Hello I recently received a request to reclaim hard disks and IP addresses within an AIX system(s). THe file systems are no longer in use and the client has indicated that it is OK to remove them and reclaim the disks and release the IP's. Now, since the file systems belong to a Volume group I... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Joseph Sabo
8 Replies

2. Solaris

Determining number of hard disks in the system

Hello to all, what is the command in Solaris/Unix which I can use to determine how many hard disks exist in the system? I have tried with different command such as df -lk and similar but cannot know for sure how many actual disks are installed. Commands like # fdisk -l | grep Disk and #... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mick
14 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to get number of attached hard disks in HP-UX

how do i get the number of attached hard disks in HP-UX (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: achak01
1 Replies

4. Solaris

Hard/Transfer errors in disks

Could you please explain us what are these transport/hard errors... when i ran the following command, iostat -E | grep Errors i got the following: sd240 Soft Errors: 37 Hard Errors: 1144 Transport Errors: 0 sd578 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 890 Transport Errors: 0 Please... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: sundar3350
5 Replies

5. AIX

Mount points to hard disks

Hi I am oracle DBA and sometimes need to see on which disks oracle data files are residing . How can we check that . The file system is jfs on aix 5.2.0.0 The method is use is to use mount |grep oracle_dir_name or lsfs mount_point_name command to see what /dev/logical_volume_name is mounted... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: clifford
1 Replies

6. Solaris

Get onyl local hard disks

How can I get only the local hard disks in Solaris? I've tried iostat -x, iostat -E, etc, but it shows the cdroms, dvds, external storage... I want only the local physical hard disks. Thanks. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: psimoes79
2 Replies

7. Solaris

Hard disks in solaris

I need to insert a new hard disk into a Sun Fire v210 machine. The (only) internal disk which is already in the machine is part number XRA-SC1CB-73G10K (DISK DRIVE ASSY. 73GB, 10K RPM, with SPUD BRACKET). I also have nearly endless access to IBM hard disks at extremely low prices and would there... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sprellari
2 Replies

8. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

External Lacie USB hard disks

I'm trying to mount a USB Lacie external hardrive in my Linux system but am having trouble doing so, I'm also having trouble mounting my USB ZIP 250 drive. It is totally me being stupid, but I'm new to unix and am having a few teathing problems. the command I'm using is the following mount... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: electrode101
4 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question