I Figured Out What to Explain to You Next: Bylaws -- And a Word to the OpenSUSE Guys

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Special Forums News, Links, Events and Announcements UNIX and Linux RSS News I Figured Out What to Explain to You Next: Bylaws -- And a Word to the OpenSUSE Guys
# 1  
Old 12-28-2010
I Figured Out What to Explain to You Next: Bylaws -- And a Word to the OpenSUSE Guys

I've been thinking and thinking about everything, and I've figured out what I need to explain to you next. Reading the log of the recent OpenSUSE board meeting discussing setting up a foundation for the project turned on the light in my head: you need to understand bylaws. Because corporations are setting up foundations to get you to donate code to them, and they set them up to suit themselves, not to benefit you. There's a difference between the community setting up a foundation to be a project's home and a corporate sponsor doing it. I'm going to write about that in more detail later. To really explain it, I need to explain some things that you might think will be boring or too foreign, but if you can learn Perl, you can learn bylaws.

More...
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help me guys

how to print first line of each repeated 2 fields only if i got files like : USA|Tony|12:25:22:431 USA|John|14:22:42:981 USA|John|08:22:12:349 France|Adam|14:22:42:981 Italy|Tony|18:22:42:212 Italy|Tony|04:22:42:212 Italy|Tony|08:22:42:212 to make output like : ... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: teefa
9 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Find EXACT word in files, just the word: no prefix, no suffix, no 'similar', just the word

I have a file that has the words I want to find in other files (but lets say I just want to find my words in a single file). Those words are IDs, so if my word is ZZZ4, outputs like aaZZZ4, ZZZ4bb, aaZZZ4bb, ZZ4, ZZZ, ZyZ4, ZZZ4.8 (or anything like that) WON'T BE USEFUL. I need the whole word... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: chicchan
6 Replies

3. Cybersecurity

Hey guys

Hey guys, new geek here, sorry I didnt see a intro section. But I do have a question and hope to make my stay here perma. I am interested in IT security, ands I really want to learn, I was hoping for whatever questions I had you guys could lead me through the narrowest path with a broad selection... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: abeja
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Please help me guys...

Hi All! I need to write a script which reads a file and tries to insert into the DB using those values... file format: var1 var2 var3 var4 var5 var6 Now I want to read from the above file and trying to insert like... insert into table1 values( var1, var2, var3 ); in a loop to... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: games_icon
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Please Help Me Guys

Dear All I have a pattern which look like this : 2 20080226_18:02:09.749 ISC-Libya Egypt-Cairo2 111 IAM 2913258040 218927157966 b 61 REL f 143 RLC :COMMA:NCI=10,FCI=6101,CPC=0A,TMR=00,OFI=80,USI: :COMMB:: :RELCAUSE:15: 2 20080226_18:02:11.629 ISC-Libya Egypt-Cairo2 170 IAM 93572641... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: zanetti321
8 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Hi guys...

I want a Bash Shell Script for taking backup of all files created to day and killing all the Process still active of mine at evening every day (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vinayraj
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help guys!

Hello Guys, I have written the following script to do certain job. I have more than 300 files, all are .pdb & .out files. and the files are (1,3,5,7,11,13,15,17,21,.......787,791,793,795).pdb /.out . But the way I created the for loop in my script works only one file at a time. But that is not... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: chuchu
2 Replies

8. AIX

Thanks guys

Hi guys, I would like to inform you that I have cleared .... IBM Certified Specialist - p5 and pSeries Administration and Support for AIX 5L V5.3 with 89% thanks to you all. Manu (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: b_manu78
0 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Hi again guys

actually i have important question about unix / linux i'm working on visuall basic and visuall c++ i heared from someone that i can't open them while i useing unix / linux is that right? if yes .......... what's the solution if no ............. thanks :) :D :D thanks my friends (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: M_Hafez
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

i need your guys help

HI. I just accidently wipe out my hard drive when i installed sun solaris, this is the last thing i remember, it ask me if want to delete the partition table, and i said yes" Im a retard" i thought solaris can't see xp partition table. Could anyone help me recover my data back, is it really... (21 Replies)
Discussion started by: souldier
21 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
RPNTUTORIAL(1)							      rrdtool							    RPNTUTORIAL(1)

NAME
rpntutorial - Reading RRDtool RPN Expressions by Steve Rader DESCRIPTION
This tutorial should help you get to grips with RRDtool RPN expressions as seen in CDEF arguments of RRDtool graph. Reading Comparison Operators The LT, LE, GT, GE and EQ RPN logic operators are not as tricky as they appear. These operators act on the two values on the stack preceding them (to the left). Read these two values on the stack from left to right inserting the operator in the middle. If the resulting statement is true, then replace the three values from the stack with "1". If the statement if false, replace the three values with "0". For example, think about "2,1,GT". This RPN expression could be read as "is two greater than one?" The answer to that question is "true". So the three values should be replaced with "1". Thus the RPN expression 2,1,GT evaluates to 1. Now consider "2,1,LE". This RPN expression could be read as "is two less than or equal to one?". The natural response is "no" and thus the RPN expression 2,1,LE evaluates to 0. Reading the IF Operator The IF RPN logic operator can be straightforward also. The key to reading IF operators is to understand that the condition part of the traditional "if X than Y else Z" notation has *already* been evaluated. So the IF operator acts on only one value on the stack: the third value to the left of the IF value. The second value to the left of the IF corresponds to the true ("Y") branch. And the first value to the left of the IF corresponds to the false ("Z") branch. Read the RPN expression "X,Y,Z,IF" from left to right like so: "if X then Y else Z". For example, consider "1,10,100,IF". It looks bizarre to me. But when I read "if 1 then 10 else 100" it's crystal clear: 1 is true so the answer is 10. Note that only zero is false; all other values are true. "2,20,200,IF" ("if 2 then 20 else 200") evaluates to 20. And "0,1,2,IF" ("if 0 then 1 else 2) evaluates to 2. Notice that none of the above examples really simulate the whole "if X then Y else Z" statement. This is because computer programmers read this statement as "if Some Condition then Y else Z". So it's important to be able to read IF operators along with the LT, LE, GT, GE and EQ operators. Some Examples While compound expressions can look overly complex, they can be considered elegantly simple. To quickly comprehend RPN expressions, you must know the algorithm for evaluating RPN expressions: iterate searches from the left to the right looking for an operator. When it's found, apply that operator by popping the operator and some number of values (and by definition, not operators) off the stack. For example, the stack "1,2,3,+,+" gets "2,3,+" evaluated (as "2+3") during the first iteration and is replaced by 5. This results in the stack "1,5,+". Finally, "1,5,+" is evaluated resulting in the answer 6. For convenience, it's useful to write this set of operations as: 1) 1,2,3,+,+ eval is 2,3,+ = 5 result is 1,5,+ 2) 1,5,+ eval is 1,5,+ = 6 result is 6 3) 6 Let's use that notation to conveniently solve some complex RPN expressions with multiple logic operators: 1) 20,10,GT,10,20,IF eval is 20,10,GT = 1 result is 1,10,20,IF read the eval as pop "20 is greater than 10" so push 1 2) 1,10,20,IF eval is 1,10,20,IF = 10 result is 10 read pop "if 1 then 10 else 20" so push 10. Only 10 is left so 10 is the answer. Let's read a complex RPN expression that also has the traditional multiplication operator: 1) 128,8,*,7000,GT,7000,128,8,*,IF eval 128,8,* result is 1024 2) 1024 ,7000,GT,7000,128,8,*,IF eval 1024,7000,GT result is 0 3) 0, 7000,128,8,*,IF eval 128,8,* result is 1024 4) 0, 7000,1024, IF result is 1024 Now let's go back to the first example of multiple logic operators, but replace the value 20 with the variable "input": 1) input,10,GT,10,input,IF eval is input,10,GT ( lets call this A ) Read eval as "if input > 10 then true" and replace "input,10,GT" with "A": 2) A,10,input,IF eval is A,10,input,IF read "if A then 10 else input". Now replace A with it's verbose description again and--voila!--you have an easily readable description of the expression: if input > 10 then 10 else input Finally, let's go back to the first most complex example and replace the value 128 with "input": 1) input,8,*,7000,GT,7000,input,8,*,IF eval input,8,* result is A where A is "input * 8" 2) A,7000,GT,7000,input,8,*,IF eval is A,7000,GT result is B where B is "if ((input * 8) > 7000) then true" 3) B,7000,input,8,*,IF eval is input,8,* result is C where C is "input * 8" 4) B,7000,C,IF At last we have a readable decoding of the complex RPN expression with a variable: if ((input * 8) > 7000) then 7000 else (input * 8) Exercises Exercise 1: Compute "3,2,*,1,+ and "3,2,1,+,*" by hand. Rewrite them in traditional notation. Explain why they have different answers. Answer 1: 3*2+1 = 7 and 3*(2+1) = 9. These expressions have different answers because the altering of the plus and times operators alter the order of their evaluation. Exercise 2: One may be tempted to shorten the expression input,8,*,56000,GT,56000,input,*,8,IF by removing the redundant use of "input,8,*" like so: input,56000,GT,56000,input,IF,8,* Use traditional notation to show these expressions are not the same. Write an expression that's equivalent to the first expression, but uses the LE and DIV operators. Answer 2: if (input <= 56000/8 ) { input*8 } else { 56000 } input,56000,8,DIV,LT,input,8,*,56000,IF Exercise 3: Briefly explain why traditional mathematic notation requires the use of parentheses. Explain why RPN notation does not require the use of parentheses. Answer 3: Traditional mathematic expressions are evaluated by doing multiplication and division first, then addition and subtraction. Parentheses are used to force the evaluation of addition before multiplication (etc). RPN does not require parentheses because the ordering of objects on the stack can force the evaluation of addition before multiplication. Exercise 4: Explain why it was desirable for the RRDtool developers to implement RPN notation instead of traditional mathematical notation. Answer 4: The algorithm that implements traditional mathematical notation is more complex then algorithm used for RPN. So implementing RPN allowed Tobias Oetiker to write less code! (The code is also less complex and therefore less likely to have bugs.) AUTHOR
Steve Rader <rader@wiscnet.net> 1.4.7 2009-12-08 RPNTUTORIAL(1)