In the latest news from SCO's slow boat to absolutely nowhere, Novell has filed its opposition to
SCO's motion to stay taxation of costs. SCO filed this exact
motion [PDF] in 2008, after it lost the first trial, Novell points out, and Novell
opposed that motion too, and the
motion was denied [PDF] by this very same court, and here they are with the same type of motion and even using the same stupid case that didn't work for them the last time.
Is SCO trying to lose this motion? Or just half-hearted? If it knows the court will not grant the motion, why file it? No. Really. Why? To keep things going as long as possible? They think Judge Ted Stewart will be more favorable to them than Judge Dale Kimball? Nothing else has changed.
When you are the paralegal, all you do is take the old document, change the dates to upgrade it, and hand it to your boss for him to add his touches, if any. I puzzle over why SCO is even bothering. But I'm thinking about that more and more. Why is SCO continuing when the outcome is so obvious?
More...
