Why I Believe IBM is Free to Sue The Pants Off TurboHercules


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Special Forums News, Links, Events and Announcements UNIX and Linux RSS News Why I Believe IBM is Free to Sue The Pants Off TurboHercules
# 1  
Old 04-08-2010
Why I Believe IBM is Free to Sue The Pants Off TurboHercules

It seems Groklaw will have to open a new category, answering Florian Mueller FUD.As you know he recently claimed that IBM had violated its public pledge not to sue Linux for patent infringement. I think he's mistaken. IBM, when it announced the patent pledge, specifically reserved the right to defend itself from attack:
"IBM has no intention of asserting its patent portfolio against the Linux kernel, unless of course we are forced to defend ourselves," said Nick Donofrio, senior vice president for technology and manufacturing, drawing applause in a speech at the LinuxWorld Conference and Expo.
And in the TurboHercules story, who is suing whom? It's not IBM, folks. The complaint against IBM was filed with the EU Commission by TurboHercules. At that exact moment, did they not take themselves out from under the patent pledge's safety umbrella?
So be it.

More...
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

IBM Virtual Machine OS on intel x86 and x64? IBM AIX OS on IBM Virtual Machine?

Hi There, I have zero information and zero knowledge for IBM virtual machine except Amazon cloud and VMware ESXi (Only Linux OS available). Anyone could provide me the following answer - Can IBM VM been deploy on X86 and X64 (Intel Chip)? If answer is yes any chance to deploy AIX OS... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: chenyung
13 Replies

2. News, Links, Events and Announcements

SCO takes one in the pants...

I know this may be in the wrong forum but it will be seen more often here... WOW!! Someone is really mad at SCO regarding their latest attempt to push around the free Linux world... But seems someone did the old rockem sockem to SCO!! ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Kelam_Magnus
6 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
FUD(8)							      System Manager's Manual							    FUD(8)

 *

NAME
FUD - provide information about user mailboxes SYNOPSIS
fud [ -C config-file ] [ -U uses ] [ -T timeout ] [ -D ] DESCRIPTION
FUD is a long lived datagram daemon started from cyrmaster that provides information about when a user last read their mail, when mail last arrived in a user's mailbox, and how many messages are recent for that user. Note that for FUD to run properly you must set proto=udp in its cyrus.conf services entry. prefork=1 is also recommended. FUD will auto- matically proxy any and all FUD requests to the appropriate backend server if it is runing on a Cyrus Murder frontend machine. FUD reads its configuration options out of the imapd.conf(5) file unless specified otherwise by -C. OPTIONS
-C config-file Read configuration options from config-file. -U uses The maximum number of times that the process should be used for new connections before shutting down. The default is 250. -T timeout The number of seconds that the process will wait for a new connection before shutting down. Note that a value of 0 (zero) will dis- able the timeout. The default is 60. -D Run external debugger specified in debug_command. FILES
/etc/imapd.conf Default configuration file. /etc/cyrus.conf Cyrus Master process configuration file. BUGS
Though not really a bug, FUD will silently ignore any requests that it does not consider valid. Also not really a bug, FUD requires that the anonymous user has the 0 (zero) right on the mailbox in question. This is only a "bug" because 0 is not a standard IMAP ACL bit. FUD is an experimental interface meant to provide information to build a finger-like service around. Eventually it should be superceded by a more standards-based protocol. CMU
Project Cyrus FUD(8)