Novell's Motions in Limine #s 9, 10, 11, as text - RE: SVRX Licenses, Substantial Performance, Arbit

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Special Forums News, Links, Events and Announcements UNIX and Linux RSS News Novell's Motions in Limine #s 9, 10, 11, as text - RE: SVRX Licenses, Substantial Performance, Arbit
# 1  
Old 02-11-2010
Novell's Motions in Limine #s 9, 10, 11, as text - RE: SVRX Licenses, Substantial Performance, Arbit

Here are Novell's motions in limine #s 9, 10, and 11. There is a motion in limine to block SCO from presenting any evidence regarding matters that were sent to arbitration, which Novell lists as SCO's copyright claim and certain bits of its contract and unfair competition claims. And there is another motion in limine asking the court to rule that SCO can't sue for specific performance of the contract, because it itself failed to live up to the terms of the agreement, a prerequisite, Novell writes, for bringing such a claim to court. And the third is about blocking SCO from contesting that agreements that came after the APA can be SVRX licenses. That's the law of the case, Novell writes, and even if it were not, issue preclusion applies (see footnote 2 of the last transcript), but Novell has been around the block with SCO a few times by now, and this is a preemptive strike to avoid having to relitigate that issue.
To help you keep track, here's where the other Novell motions, the motions in limine, can be found:All of SCO's are done as text on this page, and that's where you will find the entire list of all the motions in limine by both parties, as PDFs. The hearing is set for February 25 at 9 AM.

More...
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread
Login or Register to Ask a Question