Quote:
My point is, what he wants isn't an SSH client, it's a virtualization tool.
Accepted as your personal opinion.
For myself, from the few sentences that
chaithanyaa wrote, I have no basis to speak out such a recommendation, not the least knowing if that really may be of any good and requiring considerable efforts to be invested.
So I let the poster decide for himself/herself what he/she sees fit - not excluding the option you gave.
---------- Post updated at 10:34 PM ---------- Previous update was at 08:32 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Corona688
My point is, what he wants isn't an SSH client, it's a virtualization tool.
And yes: As far as I understood you, you possible see your advice as what is best here.
That too is why I called TIMTOWDI in: As a reminder that most of the time there may be more than the single best thing.
Many thoughts - even if no whole solution itself - possibly extend the understanding of the problem the ability to figure out a proper solution - increasing overall knowledge and learning of all participating persons.
As an aspect of a community, others may be personally pleased if there's no single best solution, which would void the value of other posts, but showing there is an important part in everyones post.
----
Back to the topic
I'm still the opinion that a simple ssh-web-term has good features to offer here:
- All software required is a modern webbrower
- No Configuration at the client side needed
- A web app can probably easily be configured
- The work to do is to set up only the server side and integrate it with the existing application
But I'm still not sure what meets the posters needs best.