Quote:
Originally Posted by
gandolf989
If you have the memory, wouldn't it be better to create a Solaris VM. Then you can use Windows and Solaris at the same time. For that matter why learn Solaris, when so many companies are using Linux... I supported Oracle databases on Solaris in the past, and it just seems that there is significantly more development in Linux than Solaris.
I do the other way around: I run Solaris bare metal, and then virtualize Windows via VirtualBox. The reason is that Solaris is more stable than Windows, so it makes more sense to run Solaris bare metal. Another reason I run Solaris bare metal, is because I use ZFS for all my storage, because ZFS detects and repairs data corruption (Windows NTFS can not do this).
If I had used Windows bare metal and virtualized Solaris, then my ZFS data get corrupt when Windows crashes, killing the Solaris VM as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fpmurphy
The general rule of thumb for Windows and any other operating system sharing the same disk is to install Windows first. This is because most versions of Windows OSes assume that all devices and all disk space belong to the Windows OS.
Once Windows is installed and functional, you can then free up disk space to create additional partitions and install a non-Windows OS such as Solaris or Linux.
I tried this approach twice, but Windows got corrupted and I had to try to rescue it. Which I did not succeed with. So I installed Solaris first, and then everything worked fine.