Atomic Tanks 2.8 (Stable branch)


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Special Forums News, Links, Events and Announcements Software Releases - RSS News Atomic Tanks 2.8 (Stable branch)
# 1  
Old 02-22-2008
Atomic Tanks 2.8 (Stable branch)

ImageAtanks is a multi-platform Scorched Earth clonesimilar to the Worms series of games. Annihilate the other tanks to earn money, then spend it on bigger and bettershields and weapons to wipe out the opposition. Itfeatures a wide array of weapons, AI players, destructiblelandscape, weather, parachutes, teleports and awide range of other features.License: GNU General Public License (GPL)Changes:
New changes include a new weapon, the MIRV; a newexperimental targeting system; and an optionalweapons satellite that takes shots at the battlefield. The AI will now use items such as teleport.It's now possible to play a game without any dirton the map. There were also a few fixes for minorbugs, including sound and graphic glitches foundin the previous release.Image

More...
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Linux

Atomic Operations

Hello I am a newbie in linux. Please tell me what are atomic operations in Linux. IS i++ a atomic oparation?? Please help.. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: aditya08
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Is `mv dir dir2` atomic ?

if I rename a dir mv dir dir2 Is this operation atomic? Suppose there 100 files in dir, does linux rename them one by one or at once? In other words, is there a time at which both dir and dir2 exist, with dir has, say 30 files and dir2 has the rest 70 files? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: meili100
4 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
atomic_ops(9F)						   Kernel Functions for Drivers 					    atomic_ops(9F)

NAME
atomic_ops - atomic operations SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/atomic.h> DESCRIPTION
This collection of functions provides atomic memory operations. There are 8 different classes of atomic operations: atomic_add(9F) These functions provide an atomic addition of a signed value to a variable. atomic_and(9F) These functions provide an atomic logical 'and' of a value to a variable. atomic_bits(9F) These functions provide atomic bit setting and clearing within a variable. atomic_cas(9F) These functions provide an atomic comparison of a value with a variable. If the comparison is equal, then swap in a new value for the variable, returning the old value of the variable in either case. atomic_dec(9F) These functions provide an atomic decrement on a variable. atomic_inc(9F) These functions provide an atomic increment on a variable. atomic_or(9F) These functions provide an atomic logical 'or' of a value to a variable. atomic_swap(9F) These functions provide an atomic swap of a value with a variable, returning the old value of the variable. ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Interface Stability |Committed | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ SEE ALSO
atomic_add(9F), atomic_and(9F), atomic_bits(9F), atomic_cas(9F), atomic_dec(9F), atomic_inc(9F), atomic_or(9F), atomic_swap(9F), mem- bar_ops(9F), attributes(5) NOTES
Atomic instructions ensure global visibility of atomically-modified variables on completion. In a relaxed store order system, this does not guarantee that the visibility of other variables will be synchronized with the completion of the atomic instruction. If such synchro- nization is required, memory barrier instructions must be used. See membar_ops(9F). Atomic instructions can be expensive. since they require synchronization to occur at a hardware level. This means they should be used with care to ensure that forcing hardware level synchronization occurs a minimum number of times. For example, if you have several variables that need to be incremented as a group, and each needs to be done atomically, then do so with a mutex lock protecting all of them being incremented rather than using the atomic_inc(9F) operation on each of them. SunOS 5.11 28 Mar 2005 atomic_ops(9F)