S-368: RealNetworks Vulnerabilities


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Special Forums Cybersecurity Security Advisories (RSS) S-368: RealNetworks Vulnerabilities
# 1  
Old 08-20-2008
S-368: RealNetworks Vulnerabilities

RealPlayer contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that may allow an attacker to execute code on a vulnerable system. The risk is MEDIUM. BY convincing a user to visit a website, a remote attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code.


More...
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Red Hat

Openssl vulnerabilities

Hi there, The following openssl package are installed on the machine (openssl-1.0.0-27.el6_4.2.x86_64). It isn't the last version but I need to known if this content Vulnerabilities... How to check that on RedHat? Could you please tell me how to find this information?? Thankx (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: hiero_nymus
3 Replies

2. Solaris

What are the NTP 3 vulnerabilities?

Hi Guru I need to know which version of NTP is install in Solaris 10 box. How can I check it. IF NTP 3 in implemented then somebody told me implement NTP 4 due to security reasons, for that I have to tell what are the vulnerabilities present in NTP 3 to higher authorities. I could not able... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: amity
5 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
PAM_FAIL_DELAY(3)						Programmers' Manual						 PAM_FAIL_DELAY(3)

NAME
pam_fail_delay - request a delay on failure SYNOPSIS
#include <security/pam_appl.h> or, #include <security/pam_modules.h> int pam_fail_delay(pam_handle_t *pamh, unsigned int usec); DESCRIPTION
It is often possible to attack an authentication scheme by exploiting the time it takes the scheme to deny access to an applicant user. In cases of short timeouts, it may prove possible to attempt a brute force dictionary attack -- with an automated process, the attacker tries all possible passwords to gain access to the system. In other cases, where individual failures can take measurable amounts of time (indi- cating the nature of the failure), an attacker can obtain useful information about the authentication process. These latter attacks make use of procedural delays that constitute a covert channel of useful information. To minimize the effectiveness of such attacks, it is desirable to introduce a random delay in a failed authentication process. Linux-PAM provides such a facility. The delay occurs upon failure of the pam_authenticate(3) and pam_chauthtok(3) functions. It occurs after all authentication modules have been called, but before control is returned to the service application. The function, pam_fail_delay(3), is used to specify a required minimum for the length of the failure-delay; the usec argument. This func- tion can be called by the service application and/or the authentication modules, both may have an interest in delaying a reapplication for service by the user. The length of the delay is computed at the time it is required. Its length is pseudo-gausianly distributed about the maximum requested value; the resultant delay will differ by as much as 25% of this maximum requested value (both up and down). On return from pam_authenticate(3) or pam_chauthtok(3), independent of success or failure, the new requested delay is reset to its default value: zero. EXAMPLE
For example, a login application may require a failure delay of roughly 3 seconds. It will contain the following code: pam_fail_delay(pamh, 3000000 /* micro-seconds */ ); pam_authenticate(pamh, 0); if the modules do not request a delay, the failure delay will be between 2.25 and 3.75 seconds. However, the modules, invoked in the authentication process, may also request delays: (module #1) pam_fail_delay(pamh, 2000000); (module #2) pam_fail_delay(pamh, 4000000); in this case, it is the largest requested value that is used to compute the actual failed delay: here between 3 and 5 seconds. RETURN VALUE
Following a successful call to pam_fail_delay(3), PAM_SUCCESS is returned. All other returns should be considered serious failures. ERRORS
May be translated to text with pam_strerror(3). CONFORMING TO
Under consideration by the X/Open group for future inclusion in the PAM RFC. 1996/1/10 BUGS
none known. SEE ALSO
pam_start(3), pam_get_item(3) and pam_strerror(3). Also, see the three Linux-PAM Guides, for System administrators, module developers, and application developers. Linux-PAM 0.56 1997 Jan 12 PAM_FAIL_DELAY(3)