Backup and restore using tar

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Linux Red Hat Backup and restore using tar
# 1  
Old 01-21-2013
Backup and restore using tar

This will be covered elsewhere im sure but i just cant seem to find my exact issue.

I want to backup my systems using tar, command is:

Code:
tar -cjpf /backup /bin /etc /home /opt /root /sbin /usr /var /boot

When i include the / directory it also tar's the /lib /sys /proc /dev filesystems too (and more but these seem to be problem directories.)

Although i have never tried to restore the /sys /proc and /dev directories I have not seen anyone mention that your cant restore /lib but when i tried the server crashed and would not even start the kernel (not even in single user mode).

Can anyone let me know why this happened and provide a more comprehensive list of directories than the 4 mentioned as to what should and shouldn't be backed up and restored? Or point me to a useful site that might explain why you should or shouldn't backup each one?
# 2  
Old 01-21-2013
You should exclude virtual filesystems (sys, proc).

Read about filesystem hierarchy standard for more information about above.
Filesystem Hierarchy Standard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here is also a good link from ubuntu forums which can be applied in this case :
Howto: Backup and restore your system! - Ubuntu Forums
# 3  
Old 01-21-2013
There's no point in backing-up things like /proc because that's the dynamic handling of processes and memory working sets (virtual memory).

However, directories like /lib, although problematic to restore on a running system, you would definitely need them in a disaster recovery situation. You would restore /lib to hard disk in single user or cd boot mode.

So you need to backup all non-process, non-memory files for the backup to be sufficient to recover. It doesn't mean, however, that you should attempt to restore them on a running (multi-user) system.

Full Hard-Drive Backup with Linux Tar
# 4  
Old 01-21-2013
Yes sorry i excluded the /proc /sys and /dev filesystems.

I will attempt to do a restore in single user mode next time then. I did think the /lib, /lib64 ..etc directories were required but after multiple attempts and the server dying each time i was wondering if i was missing something.

Cheers for your help guys, I had read those links you attached but none of them mentioned single user or cd-boot mode being required.
# 5  
Old 01-21-2013
In a recovery situation you will need /dev backed-up.

Again, you wouldn't restore /dev on a running system.
# 6  
Old 01-21-2013
If we take an example of one of our Linux servers, it is running on an HP BL460c G7 blade, in a DR situation we would e restoring this onto a DL380 server.

Although never fully tested with Linux the idea was that we would have the DL380 server setup with the same version of Linux OEL5.5 and all the filesystems and partitions already setup with the same sizes.

So from the information above take the tarball and in single user mode unpack it. In this instance would we need the /dev directory?

Unfortunately this is something i have only had 5 working days to trial before and because of doing other work and the legth of time it took couldn't get it working, and now i have no spare hardware to test on but we are doing a DR trial soon and it is going to be important to get working. The more info i get the quicker i can hopefully overcome any issues i run into on the trial.
# 7  
Old 01-21-2013
The /dev directory holds the device nodes for the hardware. It is the connection between the O/S and the actual hardware (eg, /dev/sda being a disk drive).

When you restore a backup to different hardware, these devices will be wrong for that hardware and will need to be rebuilt/reset to suit. I'm not a RedHat expert so I don't know exactly how that would be achieved. Perhaps RedHat experts on this forum can tell us how to restore to different hardware.

Anyway, the point is you need to backup all hard disk directories and ignore the directories which are really pseudo memory (eg, /proc). You need to distinguish between the two.

Work on the principle that it is better to have a backup containing stuff that is unnecessary and/or needs modification to suit new hardware rather than not have a copy of it at all.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Red Hat

Backup / Restore

Hi, I need to back up a RH file system (96G). The files are oracle .dbf format some of which are 5G in size. I know that tar has got a size restriction of 2G so I cannot use this. Can anyone recommend an alternative way of backuping up this FS? I have been looking at dump but this... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Duffs22
6 Replies

2. AIX

Backup and restore

Hi experts, i got a question. i have a production server with two Volume Group(VG) which are rootvg and datavg. Both of these VGs are 256 PP SIZE. On Disaster Recovery Server (DR server) contains two empty hardisks for restoring rootvg and datavg from production server. This two hardisks are... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: polar
7 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Backup/restore scripts

hi people i am in need of some assistance here hoping to star a linux course in january to wanted to get some experiance before starting so got a hold of some old assessments from a mate at college so just working through them in my spare time for the past 8 weeks or so and this is the final ? that... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: boabbyrab
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Restore files with TAR -- Help

Hi, Can anyone tell me the right TAR command to restore all the files dirs/subdirs/files etc. to a given directory on my hdd from a TAPE drive? I already used the list function to see that there is data on it with this commando: # tar tf /dev/st0 Now I need to copy all the data to a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: severt
1 Replies

5. HP-UX

F-Backup restore

Hello! i have a blank harddrive and a complete tape backup of the workstation. the backup is made with F-Backup. Now my question is: how can i restore my workstation? thanks for every idea! paul tittel hup-si (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: paultittel
3 Replies

6. AIX

Backup and restore

I have several H80 machines, all with AIX 4.3.3. On these machines I have mksysb running for rootvg backups and savevg for non-rootvg backups. I'm trying to get a list of files on the tapes, but I can't seem to do it with tar for the mksysb images. I keep getting the directory checksum errors?... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: uXion
3 Replies

7. Solaris

Backup / restore

Hi.... everyone could help me to understand how to do a backup of my servers .. operating systems is sun solaris 8 . I have some question about .... 1) Is better backup phisical disk or partition ??? i sow the command is ufsdump 0cfu /expbck/bcksunver/c0t0d0s5 dev/dsk/c0t0d0s5 to... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: tt155
4 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Question regarding tar restore

I created a relative backup of my home directory using tar into a file named backup.tar. No problem there. I checked it out using the table of contents command to list the contents of the backup.tar file, and there is no problem there either. But, when I tried restoring backup.tar into a... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Relykk
2 Replies

9. Solaris

tar - restore a file

We use tar for backing up a server. I need to restore just one file from this backup. Anyone know the syntax? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: frustrated1
2 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Cannot restore a TAR backup

I backed up a unix database using "tar -cvf /dev/rmt1 -N 800 /*" Normally I would restore this using "tar -xvf /dev/rmt1 -N 800" This is reporting an error about "not enough memory" I have done a new test backup and restore using the same commands and they work. ANY IDEAS ? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ross.Goodman
2 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question