FIFO's and asynchronousity?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums Programming FIFO's and asynchronousity?
# 1  
Old 01-31-2009
FIFO's and asynchronousity?

Hello,

I have a FIFO which i would like to open O_WDWR | O_NONBLOCK | O_ASYNC and have a SIGIO signal generated when there is input on the FIFO, but there a re a bunch of bugs surrounding this (like for instance i read somewhere that you have to set O_ASYNC with fcntl etc.

is this even possible? has anyone done it and even better - does anyone have a code snippet?

-> maybe i'm going about it wrong, i need to create a bunch of software serial ports (without using kern modules) - would it be best to do it via FIFO's sockets or ptys?

i figured the unix forums would be the best place to come to ask this Smilie

thanks (on advance) for the help!
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Mplayer fifo.

Hi all, First of all, sorry for the pastebin link. The code tags aren't working for me. #!/bin/bash # while-menu-dialog: a menu driven - Pastebin.com This is a channel "changer" shell script i'm working on. It uses dialog to display the menus. It... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ignatius
3 Replies

2. UNIX and Linux Applications

FIFO

Hello , I am working on unix FIFO IPC. i have a doubt regarding that. If the fifo is updated(write()) through one process....can we able to send any signal that fifo is updated and ready to get read...to other process.?? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Harry443
0 Replies

3. Programming

Help With FIFO problem...

=server.c= #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <errno.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <string.h> #include <signal.h> #define MSGSIZE 50 (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sponge
1 Replies

4. Programming

fifo

Dear friends i'm want to implement a program which one file is split into fragments by the server (by some random size) and sent to some processes, so these processes get randomly the fragments of the original file from the server, then the downloader randomly connects to some of these processes... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: saman_glorious
0 Replies

5. Programming

How to see a FIFO from all the threads?

Hello C programming fellows!!! I'm doing a program with multiple threads in gnu/linux, ubuntu for beeing precise... This program consist in multiple threads, as logical each thread do different things and communicate to each other using IPC. The problem is that in "process 1" I have a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Sandia_man
1 Replies

6. Programming

help About fifo and thread

hi, my problem is i have 10 thread for produces double two dimensional array these will produces 2d array 400 times ,then i have a thread to takes a two dimensional array then it inverse , and most 10 array can be in the fifo , and threads given takes one by one, now my problem is , i cant... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: bblackened
0 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Doubts on FIFO

Hi , I m beginner for Unix and i want to use FIFO in my 2 Scripts . I want 1 script to read data from FIFO and other will write into FIFO. Despite reading so many articles/posts i am still unable sunchronize my scripts. My doubts are 1> Do We require both scripts as daemons to use... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Akshay
0 Replies

8. Programming

how to use fifo

hi, I have a problem. I've done a lil program which gets from the server the given persons username a personal folder. I made it with a pipe calling popen with a command, but how can i make the same thing using fifo. I make the fifo with mkfifo() func. and than what. How do I tell the sertver using... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: atticus
3 Replies

9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

FIFO Pipes

Hi...Can anyone please guide me on FIFO Pipes in UNIX.I have lerant things like creating fifo pipes,using them for reads and writes etc.I want to know what is the maximum amount of memory that such a pipe may have? Also can anyone guide me on where to get info on this topic from? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: tej.buch
4 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

FIFO over NFS

Hi All L2000-44 HP-UX 11.00 I am attempting to setup a FIFO over NFS. Directing and reading from the FIFO works fine on the local machine - however when I direct to the FIFO from a server which has the directory NFS mounted it does not work. The a process to read from the FIFO on the local... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: saabir
2 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
PIPE(7) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   PIPE(7)

NAME
pipe - overview of pipes and FIFOs DESCRIPTION
Pipes and FIFOs (also known as named pipes) provide a unidirectional interprocess communication channel. A pipe has a read end and a write end. Data written to the write end of a pipe can be read from the read end of the pipe. A pipe is created using pipe(2), which creates a new pipe and returns two file descriptors, one referring to the read end of the pipe, the other referring to the write end. Pipes can be used to create a communication channel between related processes; see pipe(2) for an exam- ple. A FIFO (short for First In First Out) has a name within the file system (created using mkfifo(3)), and is opened using open(2). Any process may open a FIFO, assuming the file permissions allow it. The read end is opened using the O_RDONLY flag; the write end is opened using the O_WRONLY flag. See fifo(7) for further details. Note: although FIFOs have a pathname in the file system, I/O on FIFOs does not involve operations on the underlying device (if there is one). I/O on Pipes and FIFOs The only difference between pipes and FIFOs is the manner in which they are created and opened. Once these tasks have been accomplished, I/O on pipes and FIFOs has exactly the same semantics. If a process attempts to read from an empty pipe, then read(2) will block until data is available. If a process attempts to write to a full pipe (see below), then write(2) blocks until sufficient data has been read from the pipe to allow the write to complete. Nonblocking I/O is possible by using the fcntl(2) F_SETFL operation to enable the O_NONBLOCK open file status flag. The communication channel provided by a pipe is a byte stream: there is no concept of message boundaries. If all file descriptors referring to the write end of a pipe have been closed, then an attempt to read(2) from the pipe will see end-of- file (read(2) will return 0). If all file descriptors referring to the read end of a pipe have been closed, then a write(2) will cause a SIGPIPE signal to be generated for the calling process. If the calling process is ignoring this signal, then write(2) fails with the error EPIPE. An application that uses pipe(2) and fork(2) should use suitable close(2) calls to close unnecessary duplicate file descriptors; this ensures that end-of-file and SIGPIPE/EPIPE are delivered when appropriate. It is not possible to apply lseek(2) to a pipe. Pipe Capacity A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe is full, then a write(2) will block or fail, depending on whether the O_NONBLOCK flag is set (see below). Different implementations have different limits for the pipe capacity. Applications should not rely on a particular capac- ity: an application should be designed so that a reading process consumes data as soon as it is available, so that a writing process does not remain blocked. In Linux versions before 2.6.11, the capacity of a pipe was the same as the system page size (e.g., 4096 bytes on i386). Since Linux 2.6.11, the pipe capacity is 65536 bytes. PIPE_BUF POSIX.1-2001 says that write(2)s of less than PIPE_BUF bytes must be atomic: the output data is written to the pipe as a contiguous sequence. Writes of more than PIPE_BUF bytes may be nonatomic: the kernel may interleave the data with data written by other processes. POSIX.1-2001 requires PIPE_BUF to be at least 512 bytes. (On Linux, PIPE_BUF is 4096 bytes.) The precise semantics depend on whether the file descriptor is nonblocking (O_NONBLOCK), whether there are multiple writers to the pipe, and on n, the number of bytes to be written: O_NONBLOCK disabled, n <= PIPE_BUF All n bytes are written atomically; write(2) may block if there is not room for n bytes to be written immediately O_NONBLOCK enabled, n <= PIPE_BUF If there is room to write n bytes to the pipe, then write(2) succeeds immediately, writing all n bytes; otherwise write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. O_NONBLOCK disabled, n > PIPE_BUF The write is nonatomic: the data given to write(2) may be interleaved with write(2)s by other process; the write(2) blocks until n bytes have been written. O_NONBLOCK enabled, n > PIPE_BUF If the pipe is full, then write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. Otherwise, from 1 to n bytes may be written (i.e., a "partial write" may occur; the caller should check the return value from write(2) to see how many bytes were actually written), and these bytes may be interleaved with writes by other processes. Open File Status Flags The only open file status flags that can be meaningfully applied to a pipe or FIFO are O_NONBLOCK and O_ASYNC. Setting the O_ASYNC flag for the read end of a pipe causes a signal (SIGIO by default) to be generated when new input becomes available on the pipe (see fcntl(2) for details). On Linux, O_ASYNC is supported for pipes and FIFOs only since kernel 2.6. Portability notes On some systems (but not Linux), pipes are bidirectional: data can be transmitted in both directions between the pipe ends. According to POSIX.1-2001, pipes only need to be unidirectional. Portable applications should avoid reliance on bidirectional pipe semantics. SEE ALSO
dup(2), fcntl(2), open(2), pipe(2), poll(2), select(2), socketpair(2), stat(2), mkfifo(3), epoll(7), fifo(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.44 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2005-12-08 PIPE(7)