[C] Problems with shared memory


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums Programming [C] Problems with shared memory
# 1  
Old 11-25-2008
[C] Problems with shared memory

Hi everbody, i have a problem with shared memory and child-processes in C (unix).

I have a server that do forks to create (N) child processes. This processes work with a shared "stuct" thanks to shared memory and a semaphore. The problem is when a child modify the shared memory and the others can't see its changes...but if i done it in the main process it work fine.

finally, the question is:

can a child-process "realloc" a shared memory and the others can see it?

Sorry for my bad english, thanks a lot bye.
# 2  
Old 11-25-2008
From the POSIX specification for realloc:
Quote:
The realloc() function shall change the size of the memory object pointed to by ptr to the size specified by size. The contents of the object shall remain unchanged up to the lesser of the new and old sizes. If the new size of the memory object would require movement of the object, the space for the previous instantiation of the object is freed.
This means the child copy of the pointer is no longer referencing valid memory.
The minimum shared memory segment size is a page - 4096 bytes typically. Simply allocate several pages of memory, park the struct and other data in there and do not "realloc".
# 3  
Old 11-26-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by hurricane86
Hi everbody, i have a problem with shared memory and child-processes in C (unix).

I have a server that do forks to create (N) child processes. This processes work with a shared "stuct" thanks to shared memory and a semaphore. The problem is when a child modify the shared memory and the others can't see its changes...but if i done it in the main process it work fine.

finally, the question is:

can a child-process "realloc" a shared memory and the others can see it?

Sorry for my bad english, thanks a lot bye.
Once new processes fork off, their heap and stack spaces are not shared. In fact, neither are their memory mappings -- changing the mapping of one process won't change the mapping in the others, so you can't enlarge the memory in one and expect the others to mirror it. So somehow, they all have to have the right mapping in the first place.

One way this could work is to mmap() a file into memory with the MAP_SHARED flag, and give the mapping a much longer length than the length of the file. It will let you do this, it'll just give you a bus error signal when you use memory outside the bounds of the file. You can extend the size of the file with truncate() when you need to. You'll need to remember which bits of file/memory are being used by yourself.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Shared library with acces to shared memory.

Hello. I am new to this forum and I would like to ask for advice about low level POSIX programming. I have to implement a POSIX compliant C shared library. A file will have some variables and the shared library will have some functions which need those variables. There is one special... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: iamjag
5 Replies

2. AIX

shared memory

1.How to know wich process is using the shared memory? 2.How to flush (release) the process from the shared memory? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: pchangba
1 Replies

3. Programming

Problems with shared memory and lists

Hi, I need to put in shared memory a list made with object of this structure: typedef struct Obj{ char objname; struct Obj *nextObj; }Object I've filled my list with (for example) 10 elements, but when i try to put it in shared memory to be read by another process i get segmentation fault... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: BeNdErR
6 Replies

4. Programming

Shared memory for shared library

I am writing a shared library in Linux (but compatible with other UNIXes) and I want to allow multiple instances to share a piece of memory -- 1 byte is enough. What's the "best" way to do this? I want to optimize for speed and portability. Obviously, I'll have to worry about mutual exclusion. (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: otheus
0 Replies

5. Programming

Shared memory in shared library

I need to create a shared library to access an in memory DB. The DB is not huge, but big enough to make it cumbersome to carry around in every single process using the shared library. Luckily, it is pretty static information, so I don't need to worry much about synchronizing the data between... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: DreamWarrior
12 Replies

6. Programming

memory sharing - not shared memory -

hi, this is the problem: i want to swap a linked list between 4 processes (unrelated), is there any way i can do that just by sending a pointer to a structure? //example typedef struct node { int x; char c; struct node *next; } node; or i should send the items ( x,c ) by... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: elzalem
9 Replies

7. Programming

help with shared memory

what i want to do is have an int that can been written into by 2 processes but my code doesn't seem to work. #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/ipc.h> #include <sys/sem.h> #include <sys/shm.h> #include<stdio.h> #define KEY1 (1492) int main() { int shmid; volatile int * addr;... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: ddx08
6 Replies

8. Linux

all about shared memory

Hi all :confused: , I am new to unix.I have been asked to implement shared memory in user's mode.What does this mean?What is the difference it makes in kernel mode and in users mode?What are the advantages of this impemenation(user's mode)? And also i would like to know why exactly shared... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: vijaya2006
0 Replies

9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Shared memory shortage but lots of unused memory

I am running HP-UX B.11.11. I'm increasing a parameter for a database engine so that it uses more memory to buffer the disk drive (to speed up performance). I have over 5GB of memory not being used. But when I try to start the DB with the increased buffer parameter I get told. "Not... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cjcamaro
1 Replies

10. Programming

Shared memory

Dear Reader, Is is necessary to attach / dettach the shared memory segments for write operations , if more than one program is accessing same shared memory segments.. I have used semaphore mutex and still I'm getting segmentation fault when I write to the segment when other program is already... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: joseph_shibu
1 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question