getting the return code of forked child process (ftp)


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums Programming getting the return code of forked child process (ftp)
# 8  
Old 08-19-2007
hi
Quote:
Originally Posted by reborg
If you get another login screen and you then login, your operation will be completed, did you do this or did you press "back" on your browser?
i've got a login screen and i think opened another window from where i went back and then i logged in int the first windwow but i am not sure about that.
mfg guenter
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Why is the return code of child required by parent ?

Hello everyone, I am a complete newbie to UNIX. I am using Debian LXDE 64-bit. I have a question regarding the child and parent process communication. According to wikipedia.org and various other sources, when a child process exits it sends the SIGCHLD signal to its parent... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sreyan32
1 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

forking a child process and kill its parent to show that child process has init() as its parent

Hi everyone i am very new to linux , working on bash shell. I am trying to solve the given problem 1. Create a process and then create children using fork 2. Check the Status of the application for successful running. 3. Kill all the process(threads) except parent and first child... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vizz_k
2 Replies

3. Programming

getting the return from forked child process to parent in C++

This needs to work on HPUX and Linux. I do a fork and create a child process. During execution of the child process, it is possible child become lost or get killed. That is the reason why I create the child process. However if the child process doesnt get killed, I do want to know the return... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: usustarr
2 Replies

4. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

ftp return code not working

below is my code , but for some reason the return part is not working, only file transfer is happening and no exit status is checked .please me help me to fix this code #!/bin/sh #set -vx ftp -nv sitelocation << ! user username password lcd localdir cd /remote dir mget *.* ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: gwrm
4 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

commands not working if the executed from forked process

Hi, I have an application where if it runs indivisually could able to execute commands (like system("ls")) and could able to execute tcl script. Same application if started from health monitor process (From health monitor process my application will be forked), it could not execute the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: chandrutiptur
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

FTP Return Code

Hi All, I have a problem to identify the error code thrown by FTP Server while uploading files. The message is : ftp return 32. I couldn't find out what is the meaning of that. :confused: OS is Sun Solaris 2.10. Anyone can help? Thanks a lot (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: wilsonSurya
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Return code of background process

Hi, I have a process that I run in the background that looks like this ${BASEDIR}/ksh/sqler.ksh ${compnames003} & and I would like to get the return code of the sqler.ksh script. so my code is like this ${BASEDIR}/ksh/sqler.ksh ${compnames003} & retcode=$? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: c19h28O2
3 Replies

8. Programming

return code of a process

two programs A and B writting in c++ I am using A to B and I want to know the return code of B. in B ------------------------ int main() { return 11; } ------------------------ in A ------------------------ int main() { system(A); } ------------------------ Is it the right way... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: filedeliver
1 Replies

9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

return code of a process

two programs A and B writting in c++ I am using A to B and I want to know the return code of B. in B ------------------------ int main() { return 11; } ------------------------ in A ------------------------ int main() { system(A); } ------------------------ Is it the right way... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: filedeliver
1 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

background process return code

Hi I have the following piece of code that is calling another child process archive.ksh in the background while read file; do file_name=`ls $file`; ksh archive.ksh $file_name &; done < $indirect_file The problem is, indirect_file may contain anwhere from 2 to 20 different... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vikas Sood
5 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
SYSTEM(3)                                                    Linux Programmer's Manual                                                   SYSTEM(3)

NAME
system - execute a shell command SYNOPSIS
#include <stdlib.h> int system(const char *command); DESCRIPTION
The system() library function uses fork(2) to create a child process that executes the shell command specified in command using execl(3) as follows: execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", command, (char *) 0); system() returns after the command has been completed. During execution of the command, SIGCHLD will be blocked, and SIGINT and SIGQUIT will be ignored, in the process that calls system() (these signals will be handled according to their defaults inside the child process that executes command). If command is NULL, then system() returns a status indicating whether a shell is available on the system. RETURN VALUE
The return value of system() is one of the following: * If command is NULL, then a nonzero value if a shell is available, or 0 if no shell is available. * If a child process could not be created, or its status could not be retrieved, the return value is -1. * If a shell could not be executed in the child process, then the return value is as though the child shell terminated by calling _exit(2) with the status 127. * If all system calls succeed, then the return value is the termination status of the child shell used to execute command. (The termina- tion status of a shell is the termination status of the last command it executes.) In the last two cases, the return value is a "wait status" that can be examined using the macros described in waitpid(2). (i.e., WIFEX- ITED(), WEXITSTATUS(), and so on). system() does not affect the wait status of any other children. ATTRIBUTES
For an explanation of the terms used in this section, see attributes(7). +----------+---------------+---------+ |Interface | Attribute | Value | +----------+---------------+---------+ |system() | Thread safety | MT-Safe | +----------+---------------+---------+ CONFORMING TO
POSIX.1-2001, POSIX.1-2008, C89, C99. NOTES
system() provides simplicity and convenience: it handles all of the details of calling fork(2), execl(3), and waitpid(2), as well as the necessary manipulations of signals; in addition, the shell performs the usual substitutions and I/O redirections for command. The main cost of system() is inefficiency: additional system calls are required to create the process that runs the shell and to execute the shell. If the _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro is defined (before including any header files), then the macros described in waitpid(2) (WEXITSTA- TUS(), etc.) are made available when including <stdlib.h>. As mentioned, system() ignores SIGINT and SIGQUIT. This may make programs that call it from a loop uninterruptible, unless they take care themselves to check the exit status of the child. For example: while (something) { int ret = system("foo"); if (WIFSIGNALED(ret) && (WTERMSIG(ret) == SIGINT || WTERMSIG(ret) == SIGQUIT)) break; } According to POSIX.1, it is unspecified whether handlers registered using pthread_atfork(3) are called during the execution of system(). In the glibc implementation, such handlers are not called. In versions of glibc before 2.1.3, the check for the availability of /bin/sh was not actually performed if command was NULL; instead it was always assumed to be available, and system() always returned 1 in this case. Since glibc 2.1.3, this check is performed because, even though POSIX.1-2001 requires a conforming implementation to provide a shell, that shell may not be available or executable if the calling program has previously called chroot(2) (which is not specified by POSIX.1-2001). It is possible for the shell command to terminate with a status of 127, which yields a system() return value that is indistinguishable from the case where a shell could not be executed in the child process. Caveats Do not use system() from a privileged program (a set-user-ID or set-group-ID program, or a program with capabilities) because strange val- ues for some environment variables might be used to subvert system integrity. For example, PATH could be manipulated so that an arbitrary program is executed with privilege. Use the exec(3) family of functions instead, but not execlp(3) or execvp(3) (which also use the PATH environment variable to search for an executable). system() will not, in fact, work properly from programs with set-user-ID or set-group-ID privileges on systems on which /bin/sh is bash version 2: as a security measure, bash 2 drops privileges on startup. (Debian uses a different shell, dash(1), which does not do this when invoked as sh.) Any user input that is employed as part of command should be carefully sanitized, to ensure that unexpected shell commands or command options are not executed. Such risks are especially grave when using system() from a privileged program. SEE ALSO
sh(1), execve(2), fork(2), sigaction(2), sigprocmask(2), wait(2), exec(3), signal(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 4.15 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the latest version of this page, can be found at https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. 2017-09-15 SYSTEM(3)