i fixed some small typeos i had here and there. the problem is happening right in the constructor as far as i can tell.
so the default constructor
calls
which returns
init_ptr() is of type T* , and ptr is of type T*, i dont understand why this isnt working.
it worked before without templates, specifying the type of the pointer, so i can only assume my usage of templates is incorrect. can anyone shed any light on this?
even if i comment out all the code in the constructors except the Size = 0; or = s; it still segfaults.
i guess it has to be a problem with the template usage.
Is it legal to allocate an array of size zero? I know you can in C, it just bumps the size up to the minimum, but in C++, I'm not so sure.
[edit] Occurred to me that it could be something in T crashing, rather than the template class
i thought that might be the problem as well, but it does it even if i set the size to something bigger than zero, it also does it if there is no pointer initiliazation at all.
If you weren't using it in the correct way it'd give compilation errors, not crashes. They're very picky.
should be
but that may not be the problem either. We really need to see ALL the code.
Also:
should be
That way, it doesn't copy the object. That can cause crashes when the object itself contains allocated things -- when the copy goes out of scope, it frees the resources for both, and the next time you use it, you're using data that's been freed then freeing data that's already been freed...
Last edited by Corona688; 05-19-2006 at 12:06 AM..
Use and complete the template provided. The entire template must be completed. If you don't, your post may be deleted!
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data:
I'm doing aproximation of derivative called five-point stencil. For every value of x, in interval , in step... (0 Replies)
Currently I test a shared library vendor provided in linux , the following is the simple source :
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
extern int test1();
extern int test2();
int main()
{
cout << "hello world" << endl ;
return 0 ;
cout << "Test 1" << endl;
... (6 Replies)
I am facing a problem of memory corruption. The loop runs for the first time but does not go through the second time. What could be the problem?
for(int z=0;z<2;z++)
{
fp=fopen("poly.dat","r");
/*do something which reads this file into a 2D array*/
fclose(fp);
... (10 Replies)
Hello.
I'm looking for a quite "interesting" bug I'm using fortran 90, compiler gfortran and the main idea is for every time step I build a bin structure for search contact between particles, for this at the begining
TYPE :: circle_index
INTEGER(kind = 4) :: ind_p
TYPE(circle_index),... (1 Reply)
*** glibc detected *** ./a.out: malloc(): memory corruption (fast):
Posted A minute ago
M trying to make multiway tree and dont know what happend when this part of code get executed:
01void ins(NODE *ptr)
02{
03 //working
04 if(ptr!=NULL)
05 {
06 SNODE *var=NULL;
07 var=(SNODE... (3 Replies)
Hi,
I am having a hell of a time getting this to work. So basically, I have opened a popen to run a program that is going to prompt an action to occur half way through, when it gets to this I need to create a separate process and do some stuff, then return to the original process. This works... (0 Replies)
there seems not to be error in this segment. In some computers, it can work well. But in others, it will give a failure.
why it ocurrs and how to deal with it?
in a function:
if( *ver == NULL ) {
*ver = (vertex *) malloc(sizeof(vertex)); //this line
... (17 Replies)
I am using a structure defined as follows
struct gene_square
{
double *x;
double *y;
};I have class, with a member function which is a pointer of this type:
gene_square* m_Genes;I am allocating memory in the constructors like this:
m_Genes = new gene_square;
for (ii=0;... (1 Reply)
hi,
I have made a small C program that make use of malloc and free for processing bitmap images. when i try to run the program, I am getting a error something like
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000503e70 ***
I am not sure of which free() is causing this... (1 Reply)