select/poll and Signal Safety


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums Programming select/poll and Signal Safety
# 1  
Old 01-27-2006
select/poll and Signal Safety

Hi

I am struggling to understand why one should use pselect()/ppoll() instead of wrapping an ordinary select() or poll() call around sigprocmask(). The linux man page talks about “race conditions”, but how would such dangers occur?

I plan to use poll() for an application (since ppoll() isn't widely supported) but wish to know how (if possible) it can be made signal safe? please see preliminary code scenario below.

Code:
void foofunc() {
	int retval;

	sigprocmask(...); // block certain signals

	...

	while(1) {
		sigprocmask(...); // set empty mask

		// <- can something go wrong here?

		retval = poll(...); // wait indefinitely

		// <- and what about here?

		sigprocmask(...); // restore old mask

		if (retval != -1) {
			... // handle file descriptor events
		} else (errno == EINTR) {
			// just signal interruptions, don't panic
		} else {
			... // handle error
		}
	}
}

Any help is greatly appreciated.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

SUNFIRE V240 procedure to shutdown with safety in order to replace power cables

Question: Which commands to use to shutdown with safety the server; (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: doudou2012
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to use poll() for I/O multiplex

Hi, guys: I want to write my own shell using C. I am confused about the usage of I/O multiplex. Does anyone know some examples or explain it to me ? Thanks so much (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: tomlee
1 Replies

3. Programming

POSIX threads and data safety

I created multiple POSIX threads (on readhat Linux) in a C program in my app. What I am doing is - I am creating threads equal to the number of CPUs in the system and and equal number of instances of a certain data structure, basically a queue implementation. I am assigning one ID to the thread... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: radiatejava
2 Replies

4. IP Networking

select vs poll

Hi, Off late I had been looking at the differences b/w select() & poll() system calls. The requirement is to reduce the overhead, processor power in waiting for the data. In the kind of connections under consideration there would be very frequent data arriving on the sockets, so poll() fares... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: smanu
12 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Replace select/poll with kqueue/kevent

Hi, As far as I known, kqueue/kevent model can be used to improve the efficiency of systems event dispatching. I m wondering whether kqueue/kevent is same as the real-time OS event model. I also want to know when writing multiplexing app in real-time OS, what APIs need to be used for... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: bsderss
1 Replies

6. Programming

How to convert the "select" function into a "poll" function

i have a program using the select function but i want to convert it to poll... how can i do this? thanks in advance... :) (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rbolante
1 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
PCAP_GET_SELECTABLE_FD(3PCAP)											     PCAP_GET_SELECTABLE_FD(3PCAP)

NAME
pcap_get_selectable_fd - get a file descriptor on which a select() can be done for a live capture SYNOPSIS
#include <pcap/pcap.h> int pcap_get_selectable_fd(pcap_t *p); DESCRIPTION
pcap_get_selectable_fd() returns, on UNIX, a file descriptor number for a file descriptor on which one can do a select() or poll() to wait for it to be possible to read packets without blocking, if such a descriptor exists, or -1, if no such descriptor exists. Some network devices opened with pcap_create() and pcap_activate(), or with pcap_open_live(), do not support select() or poll() (for example, regular network devices on FreeBSD 4.3 and 4.4, and Endace DAG devices), so -1 is returned for those devices. Note that in: FreeBSD prior to FreeBSD 4.6; NetBSD prior to NetBSD 3.0; OpenBSD prior to OpenBSD 2.4; Mac OS X prior to Mac OS X 10.7; select() and poll() do not work correctly on BPF devices; pcap_get_selectable_fd() will return a file descriptor on most of those versions (the exceptions being FreeBSD 4.3 and 4.4), but a simple select() or poll() will not indicate that the descriptor is readable until a full buffer's worth of packets is received, even if the read timeout expires before then. To work around this, an application that uses select() or poll() to wait for packets to arrive must put the pcap_t in non-blocking mode, and must arrange that the select() or poll() have a timeout less than or equal to the read timeout, and must try to read packets after that timeout expires, regardless of whether select() or poll() indicated that the file descriptor for the pcap_t is ready to be read or not. (That workaround will not work in FreeBSD 4.3 and later; however, in FreeBSD 4.6 and later, select() and poll() work correctly on BPF devices, so the workaround isn't necessary, although it does no harm.) Note also that poll() doesn't work on character special files, including BPF devices, in Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5, so, while select() can be used on the descriptor returned by pcap_get_selectable_fd(), poll() cannot be used on it those versions of Mac OS X. Kqueues also don't work on that descriptor. poll(), but not kqueues, work on that descriptor in Mac OS X releases prior to 10.4; poll() and kqueues work on that descriptor in Mac OS X 10.6 and later. pcap_get_selectable_fd() is not available on Windows. RETURN VALUE
A selectable file descriptor is returned if one exists; otherwise, -1 is returned. SEE ALSO
pcap(3PCAP), select(2), poll(2) 5 April 2008 PCAP_GET_SELECTABLE_FD(3PCAP)