better way than strtok?

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

strtok() gives segmentation fault!!

#include<iostream.h> #include<string> #include<stdio.h> int main() { char *cmd="delete backup backup-iso image a.iso b.iso c.iso d.iso"; char *tokenized_cmd,*sub_cmd; sub_cmd=strstr(cmd,"image"); tokenized_cmd=strtok(sub_cmd," "); ...

2. Programming

strtok with while loops

Why is line (null) after the first while loop run? (keyword does jump to the next word.) #include <ftw.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> char filenames = ""; int list(const char *name, const struct stat *status, int type) { if( (type == FTW_F) && strstr(name, ".txt") &&...

3. Programming

How to use strtok twice in the same program?

string str1(" 1 2 3 4 512543 "); string str2; if(str2.empty()) str2=str1; cout << "str2:" <<str2 <<endl; p1=strtok((char *)str1.c_str()," "); while(p1) { ...

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

strtok equivalent in perl

Hi All, Is their any equivalent for strtok (in c) to use in perl script. Thanks in advance. JS

5. Programming

Regardign strtok() output directing to 2-D string array

Hi, I just wrote a program in C to split a comma seperated string in to group of strings using strtok() function. The code is: int main() { char *temp;//not used here but basically we extract one string after another using strtok() and assign to a string pointer defined like this. ...

6. Linux

Strtok function....

can any help me out y dis program is giving me a segmentation fault..... #include<stdio.h> #include<string.h> int main() { char *str="Tanvir/home/root/hello"; const char *d ="/"; char *ret; ret=strtok(str,d); if(ret==NULL) printf("NULL NULL"); else ...

LEARN ABOUT MOJAVE

git-cherry

GIT-CHERRY(1)                                                       Git Manual                                                       GIT-CHERRY(1)

NAME

       git-cherry - Find commits yet to be applied to upstream

SYNOPSIS

       git cherry [-v] [<upstream> [<head> [<limit>]]]

DESCRIPTION

       Determine whether there are commits in <head>..<upstream> that are equivalent to those in the range <limit>..<head>.

       The equivalence test is based on the diff, after removing whitespace and line numbers. git-cherry therefore detects when commits have been
       "copied" by means of git-cherry-pick(1), git-am(1) or git-rebase(1).

       Outputs the SHA1 of every commit in <limit>..<head>, prefixed with - for commits that have an equivalent in <upstream>, and + for commits
       that do not.

OPTIONS

       -v
           Show the commit subjects next to the SHA1s.

       <upstream>
           Upstream branch to search for equivalent commits. Defaults to the upstream branch of HEAD.

       <head>
           Working branch; defaults to HEAD.

       <limit>
           Do not report commits up to (and including) limit.

EXAMPLES

   Patch workflows
       git-cherry is frequently used in patch-based workflows (see gitworkflows(7)) to determine if a series of patches has been applied by the
       upstream maintainer. In such a workflow you might create and send a topic branch like this:

           $ git checkout -b topic origin/master
           # work and create some commits
           $ git format-patch origin/master
           $ git send-email ... 00*

       Later, you can see whether your changes have been applied by saying (still on topic):

           $ git fetch  # update your notion of origin/master
           $ git cherry -v

   Concrete example
       In a situation where topic consisted of three commits, and the maintainer applied two of them, the situation might look like:

           $ git log --graph --oneline --decorate --boundary origin/master...topic
           * 7654321 (origin/master) upstream tip commit
           [... snip some other commits ...]
           * cccc111 cherry-pick of C
           * aaaa111 cherry-pick of A
           [... snip a lot more that has happened ...]
           | * cccc000 (topic) commit C
           | * bbbb000 commit B
           | * aaaa000 commit A
           |/
           o 1234567 branch point

       In such cases, git-cherry shows a concise summary of what has yet to be applied:

           $ git cherry origin/master topic
           - cccc000... commit C
           + bbbb000... commit B
           - aaaa000... commit A

       Here, we see that the commits A and C (marked with -) can be dropped from your topic branch when you rebase it on top of origin/master,
       while the commit B (marked with +) still needs to be kept so that it will be sent to be applied to origin/master.

   Using a limit
       The optional <limit> is useful in cases where your topic is based on other work that is not in upstream. Expanding on the previous example,
       this might look like:

           $ git log --graph --oneline --decorate --boundary origin/master...topic
           * 7654321 (origin/master) upstream tip commit
           [... snip some other commits ...]
           * cccc111 cherry-pick of C
           * aaaa111 cherry-pick of A
           [... snip a lot more that has happened ...]
           | * cccc000 (topic) commit C
           | * bbbb000 commit B
           | * aaaa000 commit A
           | * 0000fff (base) unpublished stuff F
           [... snip ...]
           | * 0000aaa unpublished stuff A
           |/
           o 1234567 merge-base between upstream and topic

       By specifying base as the limit, you can avoid listing commits between base and topic:

           $ git cherry origin/master topic base
           - cccc000... commit C
           + bbbb000... commit B
           - aaaa000... commit A

SEE ALSO

       git-patch-id(1)

GIT

       Part of the git(1) suite

Git 2.17.1                                                          10/05/2018                                                       GIT-CHERRY(1)

Programming