There are some bewildering sizeof() questions I have in my mind. Could anyone shed some light on this?
That is, the sizeof() a function identifier though it is treated internally as a pointer gives 1 byte always, why?
Also, sizeof(void) gives output 1 where as sizeof(void*) is 4 bytes on my Ubuntu 8.04 (32-bit) machine. I am using gnu gcc compiler. Whether this is compiler dependent?
Also, the following program compiles perfectly for me without any error
And, why the output of the following program is still 10?
main(), and functions in general, aren't sensible things to take a sizeof of. The compiler can't possibly know the code size yet. It's forbidden entirely in C++.
It doesn't make much sense to sizeof(void) either. void is a special variable type that can only be declared as a pointer and can't be dereferenced without typecasting. That it has a sizeof() at all is probably just to make pointer arithmetic simpler.
As for what a 'void *' type is incremented to, you can test that easily by printf("%p", pointer); It is incrememented as one byte, as you'd expect for a type with a sizeof(1). Makes sense. You don't know the size of its elements, if any, so assume the lowest common denominator.
As for why sizeof(i++) doesn't increment it, an expression isn't a sensible thing to take a sizeof either. sizeof() isn't a function call or any sort of runtime operation, the compiler substitutes one literal value at compile time and is done with it. The compiler doesn't have to calculate the value of i++ to understand that i+1 is still an integer, and substitute the size of an integer. It's more akin to a typedef than anything, and you wouldn't expect an expression to work in a typedef. But since sizeof() gets interspersed inside procedual code it has to tolerate more garbage.
In summary don't take the sizeof of an expression, function, or void thing. Only variables, pointers, and types. You'll always get sane results on those.
Last edited by Corona688; 07-21-2010 at 06:49 AM..
That is, the sizeof() a function identifier though it is treated internally as a pointer gives 1 byte always, why?
Be careful with this - a function identifier is not a pointer. You get a pointer when you take the address of a function (e.g. "&main"), and the compiler treats use of the raw identifier as a pointer when it expects a pointer to be there, for example when you're passing a function pointer as an argument to a function. The following code might clarify:
A function identifier is given a "size" of 1 by gcc, and so far as I know this is nominal and completely implementation-defined.
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalibrahim
Also, sizeof(void) gives output 1 where as sizeof(void*) is 4 bytes on my Ubuntu 8.04 (32-bit) machine. I am using gnu gcc compiler. Whether this is compiler dependent?
The same goes for "void" and "void*" as for functions and function pointers - sizeof(void) should indeed be 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalibrahim
Also, the following program compiles perfectly for me without any error
With reference to the above, vptr would be incremented by sizeof(*vptr), which is 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalibrahim
And, why the output of the following program is still 10?
The sizeof() operator is resolved at compile-time, and so will produce no run-time effects. You may as well have used "sizeof(i)".
Ignoring other considerations for a moment and in general ...
Would there be a difference in result (dot oh or execution) of:
A.
strncpy( a, b, sizeof(a) );
vs.
B.
c = sizeof(a);
strncpy( a, b, c );
My general understanding is (at least I think my understanding is) that... (10 Replies)
Hai
how to find size of a file??
ex : /home/kiran/pdk/sample/calibre this is a path
In that I have to find size of a files in side a calibre(it is the folder) like .results or .summary (1 Reply)
Hello,
I'm new to HP-UX and I'm not sure about some concepts related to resizing fs's under this OS.
First of all I'm only asking about resizing ONLINE, it means, without having to umount the fs nor rebooting, etc.
Q1. I've read that in order to resize a fs online there are 2 requirements:... (3 Replies)
Hi,
I have defined the class and call the sizeof(object to class) to get the size.
# include <iostream>
# include <iomanip>
using namespace std;
class sample
{
private:
int i;
float j;
char k;
public:
sample()
{
} (2 Replies)
The below code throws the error, since the size of x = 19 is not passed to the cstrCopy function.
using namespace std;
static void cstrCopy(char *x, const char*y);
int main ()
{
char x;
const string y = "UNIX FORUM";
cstrCopy(x,y.c_str());
return 0;
}
void cstrCopy(char *x,... (3 Replies)
Hi All,
is it possible to find out the size of an array of structures ( without using 'sizeof' operator). The condition is we have the array of structure instant but we are not aware of the elements inside the structure.
Can someone help me out?
Thanks in advance. (18 Replies)
Hi ,
I m beginner for Unix and i want to use FIFO in my 2 Scripts . I want 1 script to read data from FIFO and other will write into FIFO.
Despite reading so many articles/posts i am still unable sunchronize my scripts.
My doubts are
1> Do We require both scripts as daemons to use... (0 Replies)
Hello All,
I am very new to UNIX. Please help me to find answers of below questions.
1.A script is saved with name ls. When we execute the script what it will execute?
a) Will execute ls command
b) Will execute the script
c) Will execute script or command depends on the path
... (2 Replies)
we know that sizeof never returns zero when used with structure
then why in this case it is returning zero
struct foo
{
char c;
};
void main()
{
struct foo f;
cout<<sizeof(f);
}
i am working on solaris 5.8
isn't the above function should return the size of empty structure (7 Replies)