GCC cross compiler for x86_64


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Linux GCC cross compiler for x86_64
# 1  
Old 01-03-2009
GCC cross compiler for x86_64

Hi,

I am tried to install GCC cross compiler for 64-bit machine.
i want compile one application for 64 bit machine.
I have followed steps form GCC Cross-Compile - OSDev Wiki .

Please if anybody have installed cross compiler successfully, please tell me the steps followed by you.

Thanking you,
Mandar
Mandar123
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

what is a cross compiler

recently i was been to an interview to an automotive company, they have posed me a question that what section of compiler must be changed if the target is changed. ie,if ur compiler is meant for generating executable to a 8051 target what changes do you do to make it flexible to generate the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: shyam.sunder91
2 Replies

2. Linux

Building a ppc476 enabled GCC cross compiler and tool chain

Building a ppc476 enabled GCC cross compiler and tool chain Hello, I am trying to build a cross GCC compiler for PPC476. I applied all the relevant patches. Cross compiler build was successful. When i try to compile the source code using the cross compiler i am getting the below error... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: raghuhb
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Building a ppc476 enabled GCC cross compiler and tool chain

Building a ppc476 enabled GCC cross compiler and tool chain Hello, I am trying to build a cross GCC compiler for PPC476. I applied all the relevant patches. Cross compiler build was successful. When i try to compile the source code using the cross compiler i am getting the below error... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: raghuhb
1 Replies

4. Red Hat

Building a ppc476 enabled GCC cross compiler and toolchain

Building a ppc476 enabled GCC cross compiler and tool chain Hello, I am trying to build a cross GCC compiler for PPC476. I applied all the relevant patches. Cross compiler build was successful. When i try to compile the source code using the cross compiler i am getting the below error... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: raghuhb
0 Replies

5. Red Hat

installing the gcc cross compiler

While i try to install the gcc cross compiler using following commands in fedora 6 commands cd /etc/yum.repos.d/ # wget http://fedora-arm.wantstofly.org/cross/cross.repo # yum install armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi-gcc i got an error # cd yum.repos.d # wget... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sujith4u87
3 Replies

6. SuSE

cross gcc compiler on OpenSUSE

Hi All I want to create build machine for three architecture (i386, amd64 and ia64) on 32bit machine on OpenSUSE 10.0 I installed: cross-i386-gcc-icecream-backend-4.3.1_20080507-7.1 cross-i386-binutils-2.18.50.20080409-12.1 cross-x86_64-gcc-icecream-backend-4.3.1_20080507-7.1... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Kolesar
0 Replies

7. Linux

GCC cross compiler for x86_64-elf

Hi, I am building GCC cross compiler for x86_64-elf for that a have followed steps, 1. mkdir build-gmp build-mpfr 2. cd build-gmp 3. ../gmp-4.2/configure --prefix=/usr/local 4. make all install 5. make check 6.cd ../build-mpfr 7. ../mpfr-2.3.2/configure... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mandar123
5 Replies

8. Linux

gcc compiled executable not working across x86_64 linux platforms

Hi I compiled a hello world program on two different 64-bit Linux machines, named quimby and node0331. When I compile on quimby and run on node0331 I get a "Floating exception (core dumped)" error. But if I do it in reverse, things work fine. Here's my compilation on quimby: $ uname -a... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: same1290
3 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

xl C/C++ compiler to GCC compiler

Hi, we are converting from IBM-AIX(xl c/c++ compiler) to Linux(GCC complier). As a part of this i need to change the CFLAGS. The xl c/c++ complier CFLAGS is CFLAGS := $(CDEBUG) $(PROJECT_INCLUDE_DIRS) $(COBJECT_MODE) -qcpluscmt -qmakedep -qcheck=all \ -qalign=bit_packed $(LINT_FLAGS)... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: pbattu1
0 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
ERROR::SDT(7stap)														 ERROR::SDT(7stap)

NAME
error::sdt - <sys/sdt.h> marker failures DESCRIPTION
Systemtap's <sys/sdt.h> probes are modeled after the dtrace USDT API, but are implemented differently. They leave a only a NOP instruction in the userspace program's text segment, and add an ELF note to the binary with metadata. This metadata describes the marker's name and parameters. This encoding is designed to be parseable by multiple tools (not just systemtap: GDB, the GNU Debugger, also contains sup- port). These allow the tools to find parameters and their types, wherever they happen to reside, even without DWARF debuginfo. The reason finding parameters is tricky is because the STAP_PROBE / DTRACE_PROBE markers store an assembly language expression for each op- erand, as a result of use of gcc inline-assembly directives. The compiler is given a broad gcc operand constraint string ("nor") for the operands, which usually works well. Usually, it does not force the compiler to load the parameters into or out of registers, which would slow down an instrumented program. However, some instrumentation sites with some parameters do not work well with the default "nor" con- straint. unresolveable at run-time GCC may emit strings that an assembler could resolve (from the context of compiling the original program), but a run-time tool can- not. For example, the operand string might refer to a label of a local symbol that is not emitted into the ELF object file at all, which leaves no trace for the run-time. Reference to such parameters from within systemtap can result in "SDT asm not understood" errors. too complicated expression GCC might synthesize very complicated assembly addressing modes from complex C data types / pointer expressions. systemtap or gdb may not be able to parse some valid but complicated expressions. Reference to such parameters from within systemtap can result in "SDT asm not understood" errors. overly restrictive constraint GCC might not be able to even compile the original program with the default "nor" constraint due to shortage of registers or other reasons. A compile-time gcc error such as "asm operand has impossible constraints" may result. There are two general workarounds to this family of problems. change the constraints While compiling the original instrumented program, set the STAP_SDT_ARG_CONSTRAINT macro to different constraint strings. See the GCC manual about various options. For example, on many machine architectures, "r" forces operands into registers, and "g" leaves operands essentially unconstrained. revert to debuginfo As long as the instrumented program compiles, it may be fine simply to keep using <sys/sdt.h> but eschew extraction of a few indi- vidual parameters. In the worst case, disable <sys/sdt.h> macros entirely to eschew the compiled-in instrumentation. If DWARF debuginfo was generated and preserved, a systemtap script could refer to the underlying source context variables instead of the positional STAP_PROBE parameters. SEE ALSO
stap(1), stapprobes(3stap), error::dwarf(7stap), http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Constraints.html, http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/UserSpaceProbeImplementation, error::reporting(7stap) ERROR::SDT(7stap)