Bad performance but Low CPU loading?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems HP-UX Bad performance but Low CPU loading?
Prev   Next
# 9  
Old 05-01-2010
You say the CPU load is low but according to the CPU summary from the top output you have given us there is not much spare CPU capacity:
Quote:
Code:
Cpu states:
CPU LOAD USER NICE SYS IDLE BLOCK SWAIT INTR SSYS
0 7.23 44.5% 24.0% 22.0% 9.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1 11.97 38.7% 29.6% 21.3% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
--- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
avg 9.60 41.6% 26.8% 21.7% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

when you look at the idle columns...

I find running mpstat while a system is busy because it will show if your CPUs are I/O bound.

Adding a "top -b" into a log file in cron can be helpful to see what the resource hungry processes are at that time, where as all the other tools (sar, vmstat, mpstat) show you how busy the system is they don't show what processes are responsible!
 
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

AIX lpar bad disk I/O performance - 4k per IO limitation ?

Hi Guys, I have fresh new installed VIO 2.2.3.70 on a p710, 3 physical SAS disks, rootvg on hdisk0 and 3 VIO clients through vscsi, AIX7.1tl4 AIX6.1tl9 RHEL6.5ppc, each lpar has its rootvg installed on a LV on datavg (hdisk2) mapped to vhost0,1,2 There is no vg on hdisk1, I use it for my... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: frenchy59
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

CPU with long hours in top, is this bad?

Hi, We have a Solaris server that has about 43 Oracle databases on it and we also have the Oracle Enterprise Manager - emagent that is used to monitor these databases When running top, the emagent is showing as one of the top process. Excerpts from running top shows something as below: ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: newbie_01
3 Replies

3. AIX

High Runqueue (R) LOW CPU LOW I/O Low Network Low memory usage

Hello All I have a system running AIX 61 shared uncapped partition (with 11 physical processors, 24 Virtual 72GB of Memory) . The output from NMON, vmstat show a high run queue (60+) for continous periods of time intervals, but NO paging, relatively low I/o (6000) , CPU % is 40, Low network.... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: IL-Malti
9 Replies

4. Solaris

Performance (iops) becomes bad, what is the reason?

I have written a virtual HBA driver named "xmp_vhba". A scsi disk is attached on it. as shown below: xmp_vhba, instance #0 disk, instance #11 But the performance became very bad when we read/write the scsi disk using the vdbench(a read/write io tool). What is the reason? ... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: ForgetChen
7 Replies

5. Solaris

By loading I have received the following issue: BAD PBR SIGN.

Hi folks. By disk cloning on Solaris x86, I used a command dd. I pulled out the source and inserted the new disk. By loading I have received the following issue: BAD PBR SIGN. :( (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: wolfgang
5 Replies

6. Solaris

Sun T1000 application low performance

Hello All. I have Sun T1000 server with Solaris 10. On T1000 installed EMC smarts, application for monitoring network devices via SNMP + SNMP. So, Smarts has own DB (contains object - devices and relationships), file takes 30 mb, now, all queries to DB works very slow, so Smarts works too slow,... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: hemulll
5 Replies

7. Solaris

Low average cpu utilization.

Hi to all, i have an app on solaris 5.8 writed in C++ (3.2.1) that use multi threading. Hardware has 8 cpu. When i run my app i note that the average of cpu go at least at 40%, and the performance are not so higher.. There is a cpu limitation on solaris, that dedicate only a part of cpu... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Moodie
3 Replies

8. AIX

Bad performance when log in with putty

Hello guys! I'm n00b in AIX and I'm sticked in a problem. (my English is poor enough, but I hope you can understand me :P). So.. I'm trying to connect to an AIX machine with putty, and .. 'using username xxx' appears after 2 sec (OK), but 'xxx@ip's password' appears after 1:15 min. After... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: combat2k
6 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

comparing Huge Files - Performance is very bad

Hi All, Can you please help me in resolving the following problem? My requirement is like this: 1) I have two files YESTERDAY_FILE and TODAY_FILE. Each one is having nearly two million data. 2) I need to check each record of TODAY_FILE in YESTERDAY_FILE. If exists we can skip that by... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: madhukalyan
5 Replies

10. Programming

CPU Loading

How can I measure CPU loading (like performance monitor in Windows OS). I use Solaris but I would like to write portable code. Besides, I have to write programm to load CPU with known percent. How can I use CPU in 30% for example. Thanks for any ideas. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: serge
6 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
X11PERFCOMP(1)						      General Commands Manual						    X11PERFCOMP(1)

NAME
x11perfcomp - X11 server performance comparison program SYNTAX
x11perfcomp [ -r | -ro ] [ -l label_file ] files DESCRIPTION
The x11perfcomp program merges the output of several x11perf(1) runs into a nice tabular format. It takes the results in each file, fills in any missing test results if necessary, and for each test shows the objects/second rate of each server. If invoked with the -r or -ro options, it shows the relative performance of each server to the first server. Normally, x11perfcomp uses the first file specified to determine which specific tests it should report on. Some (non-DEC :) servers may fail to perform all tests. In this case, x11perfcomp automatically substitutes in a rate of 0.0 objects/second. Since the first file determines which tests to report on, this file must contain a superset of the tests reported in the other files, else x11perfcomp will fail. You can provide an explicit list of tests to report on by using the -l switch to specify a file of labels. You can create a label file by using the -label option in x11perf. OPTIONS
x11perfcomp accepts the options listed below: -r Specifies that the output should also include relative server performance. -ro Specifies that the output should include only relative server performance. -l label_file Specifies a label file to use. X DEFAULTS
There are no X defaults used by this program. SEE ALSO
X(7), x11perf(1) AUTHORS
Mark Moraes wrote the original scripts to compare servers. Joel McCormack just munged them together a bit. X Version 11 x11perf 1.5 X11PERFCOMP(1)