You find me as dumbfounded as vbe: "SQL" (structured query language) is a quasi-standard for manipulating data in a relational database and most relational databases - Oracle, DB2, Informix, MySQL, ... support it.
AIX is an operating system. You can
install a relational database software onto it (this has been done perhaps millions of times) and - if that database software supports SQL - you can run SQL-statements against it. But AIX is NOT a relational database itself and it won't understand SQL queries to the same amount as native Windows: not at all. You cannot "convert SQL queries to AIX", because there is nothing in AIX which will understand them.
When - if - you mean to isntall some SQL-capable DB software onto AIX and convert the Access-SQL to this: this might work, by and large, but Mickeysoft built in some nasty surprises for you into its so-called SQL. In fact there are some severe differences between the SQL standard everybody adheres to and what makes MS makes you believe is SQL but in fact isn't. Here are some links:
Differences Between MS-Access and Standard SQL
How does Access differ from SQL 92 standards?
And the final proof that they are not even consistent with their own tinkering on the standards:
What are the main differences between Access and SQL Server?
I hope this helps.
bakunin
/PS: sorry if i sound somewhat bitter, but half of my life i have to explain to some clueless victim of M$$'s marketing machinery that what Mickeysoft calls "X" is not anywhere near "X" but in fact some downgraded, lobotomized version of "X" with some useless and clueless extensions of their own which is doing what is supposed to be left over from a vandalized standard in a different and incompatible way. For "X" put, in no particular order: TCP/IP, HTML, SQL, SCSI, Java, .....
I might be disgruntled but i think i have earned my entitlement to it.