i have found the reply alone, but tell me if it is correct for you:
dual-vios setup with SEA failover, NPIV and sdmc, create dlpar with 2 fc virtual adapter 1 in vios1 and 1 in vios 2, create 2 virtual ethernet adapter with priority order following the primary/standby sea.
then i suppose that if i shutdown 1 server(and 1 vios) nothing happened to dlpar because it can access disks and network.
or i'm wrong? i mean i need to migrate 1st the dlpar to another physical server to failover?
this is the point that i cannot understand well because i didn't have direct experience.
i have found the reply alone, but tell me if it is correct for you:
dual-vios setup with SEA failover, NPIV and sdmc, create dlpar with 2 fc virtual adapter 1 in vios1 and 1 in vios 2, create 2 virtual ethernet adapter with priority order following the primary/standby sea.
then i suppose that if i shutdown 1 server(and 1 vios) nothing happened to dlpar because it can access disks and network.
or i'm wrong? i mean i need to migrate 1st the dlpar to another physical server to failover?
this is the point that i cannot understand well because i didn't have direct experience.
can anyone help me with this?
Thanks
You are definitely on the right track!
Forget the DLPAR as this is not necessary on a new configuration and can cloud the issue, consider this example:
You have a brand new Power 7 frame on this you need to build 2 VIO servers and a client LPAR. The secret of an HA design is resilience and with the dual VIO configuration this is what you will get.
It is still a "best practice" to use internal disks to boot the VIO servers but nothing stops you using SAN provided disks. As you are using blades the internal disk configuration has a flaw as there are only 2 internal disks (this would be 1 disk per VIO with no mirror possible) per PS700 blade server, also the disks are NOT hot swappable.
For this eample we will build the LPARs on a P720 and therefore we will use a pair of SAS disks for each VIO server for the O/S boot device using a normal AIX mirrored pair. All client disks (O/S and data) will be SAN attached using NPIV created virtual fibre channnel adapters. Also all networks will be supplied by virtual Shared Ethernet Adapters (SEA) provided by each VIO server.
Once the VIO servers have been built the virtual server fibre channel adapters are created and the necessary virtual SEA adapters are also created (remembering to set the Trunk Priority on each VIO server for correct traffic flow and failover). This activity of course takes place on the HMC. I actually notice that you are proposing to use the IBM PS700 (PS702 / PS704) blades, these can only be controlled by the new Systems Director Management Console (SDMC). However the creation of the virtual devices is much the same as with the HMC. One thing I forgot to say above is any Etherchannel adapters should be created prior to the creation of the virtual SEA adapters so as to keep the ENT numbering sequential.
The client LPAR profile can now be created as both the VIO servers are running. Create the four virtual client fibre channel adapters (2 per VIO server O/S and data). Then create the virtual client Ethernet adapters. Once the virtual WWNs have been zoned into the SAN storage and the LPAR has been setup in SMS to boot from either the NIM server or DVD, the client LPAR can be built.
When the O/S has been installed a simple
should show the storage connected by 4 paths as follows:
This is a fully resilient LPAR which is immune from a single path of failure due to the dual VIO construction.
What benefits would HACMP hold for you?
This is debatable as you are using blades! If both your blades were fitted into the same blade centre then would there be any point in an HA? Fail over would be to the second blade. As both blade servers would be constructed in a dual VIO server there are only a handful of reasons why the environment would fail; loss of SAN etc. This would mean the only real possible failure would be a complete loss of the blade centre which, of course would affect both blade servers!
Last edited by johnf; 03-08-2012 at 04:40 AM..
Reason: added detail
VIO and HA are completely different concepts. With VIO server hardware resources are shared. If you have single Blade server and you want to have multiple client partitions then you can have VIO. Dual VIO can eliminate the downtime for hardware failure,as you client partition can be accessible from both vio.
Now if you have complete server hardware failure for i.e. servers planner goes faulty then your both the vio will be down with you client partition also. In this scenario if you have HACMP configured then your database will be up from another hardware. For HA you need tow physical servers or lpars from different physical servers or CEC's. Then you have to configure HACMP so that if one server is down your database with your ip address will be moved to another node configured in HACMP.
thanks VJM for the clarification, infact i will use powervm for the virtualized enviorment with dual vios for hw redundancy and for my client partition i will be use oracle rac cluster on aix and linux to manage the high availability without hacmp(powerha). all those things managed with sdmc on a vmware cluster.
ibm has certified this solution for their product and oracle has certified Rac for HA on Powervm and aix.
if you have another advice or something else pls let me know.
Hello,
After installing on P6 which is POWERVM IVM VIOS enabled (VET CODE D21C77ACD9229817CA1F00002C10004164 )
i get this message
"I/O hosting requires a hosting partition - boot not permitted".
HMC was connected to the machine
then HMC was removed through ASMI
Searching on... (2 Replies)
coming from this thread: https://www.unix.com/aix/211107-ibm-power-pseries-open-firmware-boot-vios-powervm-vet-code.html
PowerVM, formerly known as Advanced Power Virtualization (APV), is a chargeable feature of IBM POWER5, POWER6, POWER7, POWER8, and POWER9 servers and is required for support... (0 Replies)
Hello,
POWER7 machine.
4 x 1Gbit port ethernet adapter is dedicated to vios. 8023ad etherchannel is created using those 4 ports. Etherchannel adapter is shared to lpars using SEA.
If I test network performance directly from vios partition (using iperf) I'm geting nice 4Gbit throughput. But if... (3 Replies)
Hi,
I'm a newbie to PowerVM and LPARs ( I work with VmWare and Oracle VM Server for Sparc) .recently we purchased an 8202-e4b server, with two enclosures for add'l disk capacity. it is licensed for PowerVM standard,came preloaded as such, AIX 7.1.
I've set up HMC v8.2, and run it through a VM on... (30 Replies)
Some simple questions about Intellistation 285 and powervm.
I want to learn AIX,so i will buy an used I285 from ebay.
1)Will support aix 7.1?
2)Is powervm avaliable?Where to download or buy it?
Thanks (3 Replies)
Hi experts. I want to setup a training lab.
I have a Power 5 standalone server 9110-51A (p5 510)
I want to enable PowerVM on it and create two LPARs
I don't have money for an HMC
I know I can use IVM instead
I understand IVM is part of the VIOS software
TWO QUESTIONS:
1- If... (12 Replies)
I am facing problems in moving CD-ROM from one lpar to another.
CDROM can be seen on the POWERVM (IVM) server , but through the web-access if I move it ( assign it ) to LPAR it will be assigned. I run cfgmgr , and the cdrom does not show up in the LPAR. I firmly believe this is the reason why I... (2 Replies)
Hi,
When I try to login on my vios ivm website http://vios through the browser -- all three of them -- firefox , chrome , Internet Explorer , i get this error
http://vioserver/j_security_check
I have java installed on the machine from where i am trying to open up the IVM/VIOS webpage.
I... (2 Replies)
When using PowerVM Express and IVM (no HMC) on a Power6 P520 , can I configure 2 LPARs in addition to a VIO server, or does the VIO Server count as one of the two LPAR's that PowerVM Express allows? (1 Reply)