Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Find command not working as expected Post 98658 by tmarikle on Thursday 9th of February 2006 07:26:06 PM
Old 02-09-2006
I don't use xargs too often (using it more though) but I believe this will work
Code:
find /srcdir/ . -name '*.txt.gz' -mtime -2 | xargs -I {} cp {} /trgtdir/

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

find command not working

Hi, Having issues with the . parameter in the find command. Issuing "find . -name \*.pl" gives me find: cannot open .: No such device I got it working by substituting . with *, so "find * -name \*.pl" gives the correct listing. bin/test.pl "which find" lists /bin/find. Anybody... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: jabrady
7 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Find cmd not working as expected

Hi, i wan to search the file starting with Admin into the directory Output. I am running below command: find /appl/Output -name "Admin*" -prune but this command is going into the sub directories present under output. I do not want to search under sub directories. Any help will be highly... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vishal123
6 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

find command not working

Hi all, find command not working for me in a perticular directory.The same command is working fine in any other directory. Following is the command i issued: find . -type f -print my question is , is it possbile to disable a command only for a perticular directory ??...of course... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: panyam
4 Replies

4. OS X (Apple)

Cat command not working as expected

I've been trying to figure this out since last night, and I'm just stumped. The last time I did any shell scripting was 8 years ago on a Unix box, and it was never my strong suit. I'm on a Mac running Leopard now. Here's my dilemma - hopefully someone can point me in the right direction. I'm... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: Daniel M. Clark
10 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Read command not working as expected

I was trying to write a simple script which will read a text file and count the number of vowels in the file. My code is given below - #!/bin/bash file=$1 v=0 if then echo "$0 filename" exit 1 fi if then echo "$file not a file" exit 2 fi while read -n... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: linux_learner
14 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

basename not working as expected from find -exec

I have the following files in a directory > ls -1 /tmp/test/dir/ file with spaces 1.ogg file with spaces 2.oggI am running the following to echo the filenames but alter the file extension on the files to .mp3 instead of .ogg ( I am going to run ffmpeg against the files ultimately, but keeping... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jelloir
2 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Working with FIND command

Hi , In /home/etc/files path ran the following command find . -name 'ABC*' | wc -l The output of the above command is 25 as expected In path /home path ran the following command find . -name '/home/etc/files/ABC*' | wc -l The output of the abvoe command is 0 . Why the above... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: smile689
3 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Cp command not working as expected in HPUX

Hi, I'm having trouble with a simple copy command in a script on HPUX. I am trying to copy a file and append date & time. The echo command prints out what I am expecting.. echo "Backing up $file to $file.$DATE.$FIXNUM" | tee -a $LOGFILE + echo 'Backing up... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Glennyp
4 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk command not working as expected

Following one line of awk code removes first 3 characters from each line but when I run the same code on another linux platform it doesn't work and only prints blank lines for each record. Can anyone please explain why this doesn't work? (31 Replies)
Discussion started by: later_troy
31 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Manipulate files with find and fuser not working as expected on SunOs

Greetings, For housekeeping, I use the following command: find /some/path -type f -name "*log*" ! -exec fuser -s "{}" 2>/dev/null \; -exec ls -lh {} \; It finds all log files not currently in use by a process and manipulates them. This command always works on linux and redhat machines,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dampio
2 Replies
XARGS(1)						      General Commands Manual							  XARGS(1)

NAME
xargs - build and execute command lines from standard input SYNOPSIS
xargs [-0prtx] [-E eof-str] [-e[eof-str]] [--eof[=eof-str]] [--null] [-d delimiter] [--delimiter delimiter] [-I replace-str] [-i[replace- str]] [--replace[=replace-str]] [-l[max-lines]] [-L max-lines] [--max-lines[=max-lines]] [-n max-args] [--max-args=max-args] [-s max-chars] [--max-chars=max-chars] [-P max-procs] [--max-procs=max-procs] [--interactive] [--verbose] [--exit] [--no-run-if-empty] [--arg-file=file] [--show-limits] [--version] [--help] [command [initial-arguments]] DESCRIPTION
This manual page documents the GNU version of xargs. xargs reads items from the standard input, delimited by blanks (which can be protect- ed with double or single quotes or a backslash) or newlines, and executes the command (default is /bin/echo) one or more times with any initial-arguments followed by items read from standard input. Blank lines on the standard input are ignored. Because Unix filenames can contain blanks and newlines, this default behaviour is often problematic; filenames containing blanks and/or newlines are incorrectly processed by xargs. In these situations it is better to use the -0 option, which prevents such problems. When using this option you will need to ensure that the program which produces the input for xargs also uses a null character as a separator. If that program is GNU find for example, the -print0 option does this for you. If any invocation of the command exits with a status of 255, xargs will stop immediately without reading any further input. An error mes- sage is issued on stderr when this happens. OPTIONS
--arg-file=file -a file Read items from file instead of standard input. If you use this option, stdin remains unchanged when commands are run. Otherwise, stdin is redirected from /dev/null. --null -0 Input items are terminated by a null character instead of by whitespace, and the quotes and backslash are not special (every charac- ter is taken literally). Disables the end of file string, which is treated like any other argument. Useful when input items might contain white space, quote marks, or backslashes. The GNU find -print0 option produces input suitable for this mode. --delimiter=delim -d delim Input items are terminated by the specified character. Quotes and backslash are not special; every character in the input is taken literally. Disables the end-of-file string, which is treated like any other argument. This can be used when the input consists of simply newline-separated items, although it is almost always better to design your program to use --null where this is possible. The specified delimiter may be a single character, a C-style character escape such as , or an octal or hexadecimal escape code. Octal and hexadecimal escape codes are understood as for the printf command. Multibyte characters are not supported. -E eof-str Set the end of file string to eof-str. If the end of file string occurs as a line of input, the rest of the input is ignored. If neither -E nor -e is used, no end of file string is used. --eof[=eof-str] -e[eof-str] This option is a synonym for the -E option. Use -E instead, because it is POSIX compliant while this option is not. If eof-str is omitted, there is no end of file string. If neither -E nor -e is used, no end of file string is used. --help Print a summary of the options to xargs and exit. -I replace-str Replace occurrences of replace-str in the initial-arguments with names read from standard input. Also, unquoted blanks do not ter- minate input items; instead the separator is the newline character. Implies -x and -L 1. --replace[=replace-str] -i[replace-str] This option is a synonym for -Ireplace-str if replace-str is specified, and for -I{} otherwise. This option is deprecated; use -I instead. -L max-lines Use at most max-lines nonblank input lines per command line. Trailing blanks cause an input line to be logically continued on the next input line. Implies -x. --max-lines[=max-lines] -l[max-lines] Synonym for the -L option. Unlike -L, the max-lines argument is optional. If max-lines is not specified, it defaults to one. The -l option is deprecated since the POSIX standard specifies -L instead. --max-args=max-args -n max-args Use at most max-args arguments per command line. Fewer than max-args arguments will be used if the size (see the -s option) is ex- ceeded, unless the -x option is given, in which case xargs will exit. --interactive -p Prompt the user about whether to run each command line and read a line from the terminal. Only run the command line if the response starts with `y' or `Y'. Implies -t. --no-run-if-empty -r If the standard input does not contain any nonblanks, do not run the command. Normally, the command is run once even if there is no input. This option is a GNU extension. --max-chars=max-chars -s max-chars Use at most max-chars characters per command line, including the command and initial-arguments and the terminating nulls at the ends of the argument strings. The largest allowed value is system-dependent, and is calculated as the argument length limit for exec, less the size of your environment, less 2048 bytes of headroom. If this value is more than 128KiB, 128Kib is used as the default value; otherwise, the default value is the maximum. 1KiB is 1024 bytes. --verbose -t Print the command line on the standard error output before executing it. --version Print the version number of xargs and exit. --show-limits Display the limits on the command-line length which are imposed by the operating system, xargs' choice of buffer size and the -s op- tion. Pipe the input from /dev/null (and perhaps specify --no-run-if-empty) if you don't want xargs to do anything. --exit -x Exit if the size (see the -s option) is exceeded. --max-procs=max-procs -P max-procs Run up to max-procs processes at a time; the default is 1. If max-procs is 0, xargs will run as many processes as possible at a time. Use the -n option with -P; otherwise chances are that only one exec will be done. EXAMPLES
find /tmp -name core -type f -print | xargs /bin/rm -f Find files named core in or below the directory /tmp and delete them. Note that this will work incorrectly if there are any filenames con- taining newlines or spaces. find /tmp -name core -type f -print0 | xargs -0 /bin/rm -f Find files named core in or below the directory /tmp and delete them, processing filenames in such a way that file or directory names con- taining spaces or newlines are correctly handled. find /tmp -depth -name core -type f -delete Find files named core in or below the directory /tmp and delete them, but more efficiently than in the previous example (because we avoid the need to use fork(2) and exec(2) to launch rm and we don't need the extra xargs process). cut -d: -f1 < /etc/passwd | sort | xargs echo Generates a compact listing of all the users on the system. xargs sh -c 'emacs "$@" < /dev/tty' emacs Launches the minimum number of copies of Emacs needed, one after the other, to edit the files listed on xargs' standard input. This exam- ple achieves the same effect as BSD's -o option, but in a more flexible and portable way. EXIT STATUS
xargs exits with the following status: 0 if it succeeds 123 if any invocation of the command exited with status 1-125 124 if the command exited with status 255 125 if the command is killed by a signal 126 if the command cannot be run 127 if the command is not found 1 if some other error occurred. Exit codes greater than 128 are used by the shell to indicate that a program died due to a fatal signal. STANDARDS CONFORMANCE
As of GNU xargs version 4.2.9, the default behaviour of xargs is not to have a logical end-of-file marker. POSIX (IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition) allows this. The -l and -i options appear in the 1997 version of the POSIX standard, but do not appear in the 2004 version of the standard. Therefore you should use -L and -I instead, respectively. The POSIX standard allows implementations to have a limit on the size of arguments to the exec functions. This limit could be as low as 4096 bytes including the size of the environment. For scripts to be portable, they must not rely on a larger value. However, I know of no implementation whose actual limit is that small. The --show-limits option can be used to discover the actual limits in force on the cur- rent system. SEE ALSO
find(1), locate(1), locatedb(5), updatedb(1), fork(2), execvp(3), Finding Files (on-line in Info, or printed) BUGS
The -L option is incompatible with the -I option, but perhaps should not be. It is not possible for xargs to be used securely, since there will always be a time gap between the production of the list of input files and their use in the commands that xargs issues. If other users have access to the system, they can manipulate the filesystem during this time window to force the action of the commands xargs runs to apply to files that you didn't intend. For a more detailed discussion of this and related problems, please refer to the ``Security Considerations'' chapter in the findutils Texinfo documentation. The -execdir option of find can often be used as a more secure alternative. When you use the -I option, each line read from the input is buffered internally. This means that there is an upper limit on the length of input line that xargs will accept when used with the -I option. To work around this limitation, you can use the -s option to increase the amount of buffer space that xargs uses, and you can also use an extra invocation of xargs to ensure that very long lines do not occur. For example: somecommand | xargs -s 50000 echo | xargs -I '{}' -s 100000 rm '{}' Here, the first invocation of xargs has no input line length limit because it doesn't use the -i option. The second invocation of xargs does have such a limit, but we have ensured that the it never encounters a line which is longer than it can handle. This is not an ideal solution. Instead, the -i option should not impose a line length limit, which is why this discussion appears in the BUGS section. The problem doesn't occur with the output of find(1) because it emits just one filename per line. The best way to report a bug is to use the form at http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=findutils. The reason for this is that you will then be able to track progress in fixing the problem. Other comments about xargs(1) and about the findutils package in general can be sent to the bug-findutils mailing list. To join the list, send email to bug-findutils-request@gnu.org. XARGS(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy