10-17-2005
Thank you very much for your reply. It is "clearer" for me now.
)
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Programming
1 . Thanks everyone who read the post.
2 . the programe is that :
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
void do_it(char *p)
{
p = (char *) malloc(100);
(void )strcpy(p,"1234");
}
int main(void)
{
char *p;
do_it(p);
(void )printf("p = %s \n",p); (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: chenhao_no1
1 Replies
2. Programming
hello sir
since by mentioning a integer pointer and storing the integers
by incrementing the pointer value
then what is the purpose of malloc?
u can decalre it as
in t *p;
several integers can be stored by incrementing the value of p,
hence what is the diffrence between this... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajashekaran
2 Replies
3. Programming
Some one please explain me what is Dynamic memory allocation and the use of malloc() function.How do we allocate memory dynamically and also the other way? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: rash123
3 Replies
4. Programming
Hey Guys
I am trying to implement the malloc function for my OS class and I am having a little trouble with it. I would be really grateful if I could get some hints on this problem.
So I am using a doubly-linked list as my data structure and I have to allocate memory for it (duh...). The... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Gambit_b
1 Replies
5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hey Guys
Some of my friends have got together and we are trying to write a basic kernel similar to Linux. I am trying to implement the malloc function in C and I am using a doubly linked list as the primary data structure. I need to allocate memory for this link list (duh...) and I don't feel... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rbansal2
2 Replies
6. Programming
Why when using realloc, john is reversed 3 times but not the other 2 names ? But if I use malloc, then the 3 names are reversed correctly ? (but then there is a memory leak)
How can I reverse all 3 names without a memory leak ?
char *BUFFER = NULL;
char *STRREVERSE(const char *STRING)
{... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: cyler
5 Replies
7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Do kmalloc and malloc allocate from same heap ? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: dragonpoint
3 Replies
8. Programming
Hi i found code in google how to malloc an 2D array and i tried that :
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
int **A;
int **B;
int main(int argc,char *argv)
{
printf("name of text : %s\n",argv);
//read arrays
int i,j;
int l,m;
int M,n;
FILE *fp;
fp=fopen(argv,"r");
... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: giampoul
0 Replies
9. Programming
Which one is faster among malloc and new?
My understanding is that since new also has to call constructors after allocating memory it must be slower than malloc.
Am I correct? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rupeshkp728
1 Replies
10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Good day! I'm a newbie in C. I'm trying to get an unlimited input from the user using malloc then printing the inputs after the user presses enter. My code works, but there's a warning that I don't know how to fix. Please help me. Thank you.
Here's my code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: eracav
6 Replies
MALLOC(3) Library Functions Manual MALLOC(3)
NAME
malloc, free, realloc, calloc, alloca - memory allocator
SYNOPSIS
char *malloc(size)
unsigned size;
free(ptr)
char *ptr;
char *realloc(ptr, size)
char *ptr;
unsigned size;
char *calloc(nelem, elsize)
unsigned nelem, elsize;
char *alloca(size)
int size;
DESCRIPTION
Malloc and free provide a general-purpose memory allocation package. Malloc returns a pointer to a block of at least size bytes beginning
on a word boundary.
The argument to free is a pointer to a block previously allocated by malloc; this space is made available for further allocation, but its
contents are left undisturbed.
Needless to say, grave disorder will result if the space assigned by malloc is overrun or if some random number is handed to free.
Malloc maintains multiple lists of free blocks according to size, allocating space from the appropriate list. It calls sbrk (see brk(2))
to get more memory from the system when there is no suitable space already free.
Realloc changes the size of the block pointed to by ptr to size bytes and returns a pointer to the (possibly moved) block. The contents
will be unchanged up to the lesser of the new and old sizes.
In order to be compatible with older versions, realloc also works if ptr points to a block freed since the last call of malloc, realloc or
calloc; sequences of free, malloc and realloc were previously used to attempt storage compaction. This procedure is no longer recommended.
Calloc allocates space for an array of nelem elements of size elsize. The space is initialized to zeros.
Alloca allocates size bytes of space in the stack frame of the caller. This temporary space is automatically freed on return.
Each of the allocation routines returns a pointer to space suitably aligned (after possible pointer coercion) for storage of any type of
object. If the space is of pagesize or larger, the memory returned will be page-aligned.
SEE ALSO
brk(2), pagesize(2)
DIAGNOSTICS
Malloc, realloc and calloc return a null pointer (0) if there is no available memory or if the arena has been detectably corrupted by stor-
ing outside the bounds of a block. Malloc may be recompiled to check the arena very stringently on every transaction; those sites with a
source code license may check the source code to see how this can be done.
BUGS
When realloc returns 0, the block pointed to by ptr may be destroyed.
The current implementation of malloc does not always fail gracefully when system memory limits are approached. It may fail to allocate
memory when larger free blocks could be broken up, or when limits are exceeded because the size is rounded up. It is optimized for sizes
that are powers of two.
Alloca is machine dependent; its use is discouraged.
4th Berkeley Distribution May 14, 1986 MALLOC(3)