08-05-2005
interesting that someone else has encountered the same thing. Yes, your solution has come to mind. But that will be a last resort. At the moment I havenīt got the space to create extra partitions. I need to get a new HD to backup things.
This partition that is lost to w2k has just been a normal drive, it never had w2k installed on it.
The partimage thing looks interesting, will keep it in mind for the future. It says itīs NTFS support is experimental though, maybe that was why it didnīt work for you?
Thanks for the input so far.
Anyone else with insight into this issue?
4 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi,
i know a little bit of Unix, but not a whole lot.
I have a PC with W2K running on it.
I want to install redhat Linux 7.3 as new OS in dual boot.
do I need to install a boot manager like system commander or does the linux install detects other OS'es and create a dual boot 4 me (like... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: maxthree
4 Replies
2. Linux
How do I mount a Windows 2K share on Redhat Linux?
I tried this: mount -t smbfs -o username=administrator,password=mypassword //machine/share
But it just returns the help for the mount command:( (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Spetnik
3 Replies
3. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
I had single SATA drive win W2K on it. Then I added another SATA and installed XP on it. Now I have a choice of OS when I boot up my PC.
After I boot into XP it is D: that has XP installed.
I wanted to take and use my 1st disk somewhere else, but quickly learned that I can not boot off of... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: migurus
1 Replies
4. HP-UX
My company has several HP Model 715/100 machines running HP-UX 9 , that can't really be upgraded due to compatibility issues with some equipment it's tied to. Each UX box mounts a directory off of a Windows NT4 machine acting as an NFS server (using DiskShare Server 3 and 4), and as we upgrade the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: GoldnPantaloons
3 Replies