Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers SCO Openserver 5.0.7 NSTRPAGES Exceeded Post 79132 by josramon on Monday 25th of July 2005 04:46:40 PM
Old 07-25-2005
SCO Openserver 5.0.7 NSTRPAGES Exceeded

Hello guys i'm getting this error on a sco 5.0.7 machine and i have no idea why i'm getting this error.

I know how to encrease the value of NSTRPAGES, right now i have it up to 4000.

I would like to know what is NSTRPAGES and what is causing this error to come up in my server.


Thanks a lot guys for all your help.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Help For SCO OpenServer

I've just installed Unix SCO OpenServer System v in an Intel PC and Everithing ok, except just one thing, in the begining of the installation the wizard asked me about the mouse , i have a generic 3 buttons mouse and i took a logitech and did not work i need to change the mouse configuration, ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jimmyvaldes
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

sco openserver 5.5

hello! when i try to make my system dual boot with both win98 & sco open server 5.5 it doesn't work at all.neither win98 take start nor sco open server boots.what should i do ? kindly help me thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: buntty
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

SCO 5.0.2 openserver

I am doing some work for a customer that is running SCO 5.0.2 openserver and they have lost their cd. Is there anyplace I can download it? I have a replacement being shipped but it will not be here for two days and they are down. Any ideals? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: SCOoT
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Upgrade SCO openserver

Hi guys i have a unix server SCO 5.0.4 and i'm trying to install and intel pro 100 and for some reason it wont see it , i tried to install a 3 com card and same thing. I know that if i had 5.0.6 it will see any of those cards.my questions is ( if i upgrade to 5.0.6 i have a computone card... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: josramon
4 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

SCO Openserver 6.0

Hi there guys. I just got this new SCO version and i'm having some problem printing from shell, This is what i'm typing at the # sign : lp -dHP /etc/hosts and it prints no problem but when i use any other user at the $ sign it gives me this error. /dev/fd/7: /usr/lib/lp/sysv/7: not found. ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: josramon
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

SCO Openserver 6.0

Hi guys, I just got this new 6.0 version and i'm trying to setup a remote office to telnet to this server running sco 6.0, in previous version all i have to do is add this file under /etc/rc2.d call S99route and put the gate in that file and that was it, for some reason in 6.0 it does not... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: josramon
1 Replies

7. SCO

sco openserver 5.0.7

Dear members when i installed dual processor patch in openserver 5.0.7 in hp ML370 G4 server it hangs in sco at G_hd_config. i tried MP4, EFS 5.64,5.70A but not solved the problem.. (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: M_farooqui
0 Replies

8. SCO

I need SCO Openserver 4.2!!!!

I need SCO Openserver 4.2. Please, give me distributive of that version SCO:eek: (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: caine
0 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

File size limit exceeded... SCO ulimit?

Hello - O/S is UnixWare 7.1.4 My prefered method of copying files between servers is 'rcp', which does not recognize symbolic links; therefore, files are duplicated many times over. To avoid this duplication, I would like to use 'tar' and/or 'cpio' and pipe them through 'rcp', but... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rm -r *
1 Replies

10. SCO

DSL on SCO OpenServer 5.0.7

I have a dual boot computer with Windows 7 Pro 64 on one drive and SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 on another drive. The DSL modem works perfectly on the Windows side; I can input the gateway and DNS address 192.168.1.1 in Windows network configuration. On the UNIX side, I created the /etc/resolv.conf... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Transpower
8 Replies
funidx(7)							SAORD Documentation							 funidx(7)

NAME
Funidx - Using Indexes to Filter Rows in a Table SYNOPSIS
This document contains a summary of the user interface for filtering rows in binary tables with indexes. DESCRIPTION
Funtools Table Filtering allows rows in a table to be selected based on the values of one or more columns in the row. Because the actual filter code is compiled on the fly, it is very efficient. However, for very large files (hundreds of Mb or larger), evaluating the filter expression on each row can take a long time. Therefore, funtools supports index files for columns, which are used automatically during fil- tering to reduce dramatically the number of row evaluations performed. The speed increase for indexed filtering can be an order of magni- tude or more, depending on the size of the file. The funindex program creates an index on one or more columns in a binary table. For example, to create an index for the column pi in the file huge.fits, use: funindex huge.fits pi This will create an index named huge_pi.idx. When a filter expression is initialized for row evaluation, funtools looks for an index file for each column in the filter expression. If found, and if the file modification date of the index file is later than that of the data file, then the index will be used to reduce the number of rows that are evaluated in the filter. When Spatial Region Filtering is part of the expression, the columns associated with the region are checked for index files. If an index file is not available for a given column, then in general, all rows must be checked when that column is part of a filter expression. This is not true, however, when a non-indexed column is part of an AND expression. In this case, only the rows that pass the other part of the AND expression need to be checked. Thus, in some cases, filtering speed can increase significantly even if all columns are not indexed. Also note that certain types of filter expression syntax cannot make use of indices. For example, calling functions with column names as arguments implies that all rows must be checked against the function value. Once again, however, if this function is part of an AND expres- sion, then a significant improvement in speed still is possible if the other part of the AND expression is indexed. For example, note below the dramatic speedup in searching a 1 Gb file using an AND filter, even when one of the columns (pha) has no index: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 42.36u 13.07s 6:42.89 13.7% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: [INDEF] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxand(1): INDEF [IDX_OR_SORT] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 1.55u 0.37s 1:19.80 2.4% When all columns are indexed, the increase in speed can be even more dramatic: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 42.60u 12.63s 7:28.63 12.3% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: pi start=9473025,stop=9492240 => pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxor sort/merge: pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] [IDX_OR_SORT] idxmerge(5): [IDX_OR_SORT] pi[ROW] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 1.67u 0.30s 0:24.76 7.9% The miracle of indexed filtering (and indeed, of any indexing) is the speed of the binary search on the index, which is of order log2(n) instead of n. (The funtools binary search method is taken from http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/03/22/Binary, to whom grateful acknowledgement is made.) This means that the larger the file, the better the performance. Conversely, it also means that for small files, using an index (and the overhead involved) can slow filtering down somewhat. Our tests indicate that on a file containing a few tens of thousands of rows, indexed filtering can be 10 to 20 percent slower than non-indexed filtering. Of course, your mileage will vary with con- ditions (disk access speed, amount of available memory, process load, etc.) Any problem encountered during index processing will result in indexing being turned off, and replaced by filtering all rows. You can turn filtering off manually by setting the idx_activate variable to 0 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_ACTIVATE environment variable to 0 (in the global environment). Debugging output showing how the indexes are being processed can be displayed to stderr by setting the idx_debug variable to 1 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_DEBUG environment variable to 1 (in the global environment). Currently, indexed filtering only works with FITS binary tables and raw event files. It does not work with text files. This restriction might be removed in a future release. SEE ALSO
See funtools(7) for a list of Funtools help pages version 1.4.2 January 2, 2008 funidx(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy