Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Question: non-recursive find syntax Post 62890 by alexkav on Monday 21st of February 2005 09:47:53 AM
Old 02-21-2005
help again

Hello agian, is it possible to adjust the "find" command to only find files beginning with "G" and followed by numbers?

For example:

good: G102030
bad: GFI_UPLOAD.log

Thanks,
alexkav
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Performing a non-recursive find in Unix

I need to perform a non-recursive find in Unix. Sounds simple, but it doesn't actually work. The command ALWAYS searches through the subdirectories. Any ideas? I am on DEC Unix :-( (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: christallott
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

making a recursive find more useful..

Hi everyone, I'm using a recursive find (you know the type, find . -name qwert*) to find a set of files. However, because I'm new to the system and there is not much documentation about these particular files I'm trying to find them using this recursive find. I started off at the location... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: spanish_tony
3 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Recursive find and store

I HAVE A TEXT FILE CONTAINING THE VALUES 1.CPP 2.CPP 3.CPP 4.CPP 5.CPP 6.CPP I WANT TO TAKE EACH .CPP AND USE THE FIND COMMAND TO FIND THE LATEST VERSION OF THE FOLDER IN WHICH IT IS PRESENT. HOW DO I IMPLEMENT IT IN A WHILE LOOP I TRIED SOMETHING LIKE THIS WHILE CAT... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ultimatix
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Non recursive find command

Hi, I have question is related to find command. I want to find command should search in current folder only not recursive mode(sub-folders). I found a one way of, find . \( -name success -prune \) -o -name "Rajini*" How ever, my current folder is having lots sub-folders and am not... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nagapandi
7 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Recursive directory search using ls instead of find

I was working on a shell script and found that the find command took too long, especially when I had to execute it multiple times. After some thought and research I came up with two functions. fileScan() filescan will cd into a directory and perform any operations you would like from within... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: newreverie
8 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Find/Grep Syntax Question

Hi Folks, I am trying to dig through about 100 directories that have 1 or 2 .jpg images stored in each. I want to copy the .jpg to another file in the root directory. Really my ultimate goal is not to have to dig down into each directory to copy the images individually. I thought I could use a... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: alpinescott
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Some advice please on non-recursive find

Hi all, I am currently writing a find-and-remove kind of script that is to be used for Solaris and Linux. Currently am using the find command below that I is in find only current directory (universal) | commandlinefu.com This however gives me the "ksh: /bin/find: arg list too long" error... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: newbie_01
6 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Non Recursive Find Command

Hello Unix Gurus, I am using the following find commands: 1) find Input_Path -name '*.' -exec mv -f {} Outputpath \; 2) find Inputpath -name '*.' -exec cp {} Outputpath \; 3) find Somepath -name '*.' Now the problem is my Unix version does not support maxdepth Option for find... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: pchegoor
7 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Recursive Find on file size

Is there a way to use the find command to recursively scan directories for files greater than 1Gb in size and print out the directory path and file name only? Thanks in advance. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: jimbojames
6 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Help needed - find command for recursive search

Hi All I have a requirement to find the file that are most latest to be modified in each directory. Can somebody help with the command please? E.g of the problem. The directory A is having sub directory which are having subdirectory an so on. I need a command which will find the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sudeep.id
2 Replies
BADSECT(8)						      System Manager's Manual							BADSECT(8)

NAME
badsect - create files to contain bad sectors SYNOPSIS
/sbin/badsect sector ... DESCRIPTION
Badsect makes a file to contain a bad sector. Normally, bad sectors are made inaccessible by the standard formatter, which provides a for- warding table for bad sectors to the driver; see bad144(8) for details. If a driver supports the bad blocking standard it is much prefer- able to use that method to isolate bad blocks, since the bad block forwarding makes the pack appear perfect, and such packs can then be copied with dd(1). The technique used by this program is also less general than bad block forwarding, as badsect can't make amends for bad blocks in the i-list of file systems or in swap areas. Adding a sector which is suddenly bad to the bad sector table currently requires the running of the standard DEC formatter, as UNIX does not supply formatters. Thus to deal with a newly bad block or on disks where the drivers do not support the bad-blocking standard badsect may be used to good effect. Badsect is used on a quiet file system in the following way: First mount the file system, and change to its root directory. Make a direc- tory BAD there and change into it. Run badsect giving as argument all the bad sectors you wish to add. (The sector numbers should be given as physical disk sectors relative to the beginning of the file system, exactly as the system reports the sector numbers in its con- sole error messages.) Then change back to the root directory, unmount the file system and run fsck(8) on the file system. The bad sectors should show up in two files or in the bad sector files and the free list. Have fsck remove files containing the offending bad sectors, but do not have it remove the BAD/nnnnn files. This will leave the bad sectors in only the BAD files. Badsect works by giving the specified sector numbers in a mknod(2) system call (after taking into account the filesystem's block size), creating a regular file whose first block address is the block containing bad sector and whose name is the bad sector number. The file has 0 length, but the check programs will still consider it to contain the block containing the sector. This has the pleasant effect that the sector is completely inaccessible to the containing file system since it is not available by accessing the file. SEE ALSO
mknod(2), bad144(8), fsck(8) BUGS
If both sectors which comprise a (1024 byte) disk block are bad, you should specify only one of them to badsect, as the blocks in the bad sector files actually cover both (bad) disk sectors. On the PDP-11, only sector number less than 131072 may be specified on 1024-byte block filesystems, 65536 on 512-byte block filesystems. This is because only a short int is passed to the system from mknod. 3rd Berkeley Distribution BADSECT(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy