09-02-2001
check my code?? running shell from c?
Hi mates,
i am trying to run a shell command from my C program in this case let is say the "ls" command. It copiles it okay, and even creates the new fork too. But seems to nothing is happening i mean it is not showing the result of the "ls" command.
I don't know wat i am doing wrong. Any comment will be appreciated.
abdul
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int p_id;
int child_status;
int cpid;
main()
{
cpid=fork();
switch (cpid)
{
case -1:
perror("fork");
exit(1);
case 0:
printf("The fork is successful!\n");
system('ls');
exit(0);
default:
wait(&child_status);
}
}
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Does anyone know if there is a UNIX-tool available that constantly will check if (some specific) deamons are running and will notify (via email) if one has failed/stopped?
I searched the web, but so far didn't find anything. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: W2W
3 Replies
2. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi
I want to check whether specific process is running or not through a shell script.
ps -ef | grep will tell me this, i tried this way in shell
cnt =`ps -ef| grep xyz | awk '{ END {print NR}}`
if it return two rows, job is running else not.
Is there any better way of doing this. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: agp
3 Replies
3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
I want to write a unix shell script that will check if a process (say debu) is running in the server or not. If no , then send a mail to the corresponding person to start the process??? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: debu
2 Replies
4. OS X (Apple)
What I want my script to do is to run a command in Terminal and close that same Terminal window when the process is complete.
Of course I could ad a delay of 6 seconds to complete the process, but it may not be enough every time.
To simplify my question, this is what I want to achieve.... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: ShadowofLight
9 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi,
I put this at start of my shell (korn shell) to be sure that the shell is not already running and sometimes it fails and says that it is already running which is not true !
sleep 1
/usr/bin/ps -ef | /usr/bin/grep "$0" | /usr/bin/egrep -v grep>$LOGDIR/$0.res
isup=$(cat $LOGDIR/$0.res|wc... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: zionassedo
4 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi Experts,
I am checking how to get day in Perl.
If it is “Monday” I need to process…below is the pseudo code.
Can you please prove the code for below condition.
if (today=="Monday" )
{
while (current_time LESS THAN 9:01 AM)
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ajaypatil_am
1 Replies
7. Shell Programming and Scripting
hi guys
we've had nagios spewing false alarm (for the umpteenth time) and finally the customer had enough so they're starting to question nagios. we had the check interval increased from 5 minutes to 2 minutes, but that's just temporary solution. I'm thinking of implementing a script on the... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: hedkandi
8 Replies
8. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi Everyone,
Is there any way ( generic) to check syntax of Shell Scripts without running it?? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: roy121
4 Replies
9. Shell Programming and Scripting
I want to check how many processes are running with same names and get their respective counts.
ps -ef|grep -Eo 'process1|process2|process3| '|sort -u | awk '{print $2": "$1}'
Output would look like :
$ ps -ef|grep -Eo 'process1|process2|process3| '|sort | uniq -c | awk '{print $2":... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: simpltyansh
8 Replies
10. Shell Programming and Scripting
I am working on script. it reads a file which contains multiple lines
Ex;
curl --write-out %{http_code} --silent --output /dev/null http://hostname:port/input=1
curl --write-out %{http_code} --silent --output /dev/null http://hostname:port/input=2
curl --write-out %{http_code} --silent ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: oraclermanpt
2 Replies
SYSTEM(3) Linux Programmer's Manual SYSTEM(3)
NAME
system - execute a shell command
SYNOPSIS
#include <stdlib.h>
int system(const char *command);
DESCRIPTION
system() executes a command specified in command by calling /bin/sh -c command, and returns after the command has been completed. During
execution of the command, SIGCHLD will be blocked, and SIGINT and SIGQUIT will be ignored.
RETURN VALUE
The value returned is -1 on error (e.g. fork(2) failed), and the return status of the command otherwise. This latter return status is in
the format specified in wait(2). Thus, the exit code of the command will be WEXITSTATUS(status). In case /bin/sh could not be executed,
the exit status will be that of a command that does exit(127).
If the value of command is NULL, system() returns nonzero if the shell is available, and zero if not.
system() does not affect the wait status of any other children.
CONFORMING TO
C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001.
NOTES
If the _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro is defined, then the macros described in wait(2) (WEXITSTATUS(), etc.) are made available when
including <stdlib.h>.
As mentioned, system() ignores SIGINT and SIGQUIT. This may make programs that call it from a loop uninterruptible, unless they take care
themselves to check the exit status of the child. E.g.
while (something) {
int ret = system("foo");
if (WIFSIGNALED(ret) &&
(WTERMSIG(ret) == SIGINT || WTERMSIG(ret) == SIGQUIT))
break;
}
Do not use system() from a program with set-user-ID or set-group-ID privileges, because strange values for some environment variables might
be used to subvert system integrity. Use the exec(3) family of functions instead, but not execlp(3) or execvp(3). system() will not, in
fact, work properly from programs with set-user-ID or set-group-ID privileges on systems on which /bin/sh is bash version 2, since bash 2
drops privileges on startup. (Debian uses a modified bash which does not do this when invoked as sh.)
In versions of glibc before 2.1.3, the check for the availability of /bin/sh was not actually performed if command was NULL; instead it was
always assumed to be available, and system() always returned 1 in this case. Since glibc 2.1.3, this check is performed because, even
though POSIX.1-2001 requires a conforming implementation to provide a shell, that shell may not be available or executable if the calling
program has previously called chroot(2) (which is not specified by POSIX.1-2001).
It is possible for the shell command to return 127, so that code is not a sure indication that the execve(2) call failed.
SEE ALSO
sh(1), signal(2), wait(2), exec(3)
COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.25 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can
be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
2004-12-20 SYSTEM(3)