Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Problems with Xfree86
Operating Systems BSD Problems with Xfree86 Post 52915 by Russell on Tuesday 29th of June 2004 03:37:57 PM
Old 06-29-2004
You may need to post your XF86Config file.

And to remove the error XAUTH: (ARGV):1: BAD DISPLAY NAME "FREEBSD.VISABEL:0" IN "REMOVE" COMMAND put the following in youe /etc/hosts file:

127.0.0.1 freebsd.visabel
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

xfree86 configuration

I've been trying to configure XFree86, and the first times that I have, it will only run at 320x? resolution.. I have an ATI card, and I've tried using the /stand/sysinstall graphical configuration method, and I've tried xf86config as well, both render the same results. that was before i... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: adn
3 Replies

2. Programming

XFree86

So where do we post questions about developing for X? Or do we just not do that here? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Gekko
2 Replies

3. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

XFREE86 4.2 question

Hi folkss... I just install Freebsd 4.5 mini disk which install only the core FREEBSD system nothing else. I then want to install KDE 3.0 so I install XFREE86 4.2 and I installed both of these programs successfully with pkg_add "filename.tgz" I also install wrapper.tgz for "startx"... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: helpme2
1 Replies

4. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

Installing XFREE86 4.2 question

Hi folksss.. I will ask similiar to my previous post. Have anyone successfully install XFree86 ver. 4.2 on FREEBSD 4.5 from scratch ??? If U do, please provide step by step how U do it. Do U use graphic user interface to setup the hardware configuration or DOS configuration ? I... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: helpme2
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

compiling XFRee86 4.2.0

i am currently trying to compile XFree86 under redhat 7.3. i am used to ./configure make make install, but i know that xfree86 is very different. what are the basic steps for building it. i already have read the documentation, but it wasn't of much help. it was erroring out on the imake. i don't... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: choasforages
1 Replies

6. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

X.Org and XFree86

X.Org just released a new version of their X (X11R6.7). Besides Liscense stuff, what is better about X.org then XFree? What is better about XFree then X.org? Also: Will my fglrx (ATI) or nvidia drivers (designed for XFree86 4.3) work on X.org? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: punkrockguy318
2 Replies

7. BSD

again XFree86

hi everybody i installed FreeBSD 5.x on a box with a video card Diamond SpeedStar A90 and a Fujitsu Siemens Monitor B772-1 when i do "startx" it gives me something like this: fatal error: no devices detected no screen detected i'm lost...i don't know what to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: hmaiida
3 Replies

8. BSD

XFree86 4.5 problem

Hello, i have a S3 Trio64V+ card. I installed last release of XFree under FreeBSD 5.4. I do xf86config, but when i try startx i have this error: nsinternal# startx XFree86 Version 4.5.0 Release Date: 16 March 2005 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: FreeBSD... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jamesf
1 Replies

9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Old XFree86 configuration error

Hello experts, I installed an old linux distribution and i'm having troubles with the XFree86 server. The thing is, when i run XF86Setup, X server and windows actually works, because i can get the graphical configuration screen, but when i'm "done" and save the changes to the config file... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: semash!
1 Replies
REMOVE(3)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 REMOVE(3)

NAME
remove - remove a file or directory SYNOPSIS
#include <stdio.h> int remove(const char *pathname); DESCRIPTION
remove() deletes a name from the file system. It calls unlink(2) for files, and rmdir(2) for directories. If the removed name was the last link to a file and no processes have the file open, the file is deleted and the space it was using is made available for reuse. If the name was the last link to a file, but any processes still have the file open, the file will remain in existence until the last file descriptor referring to it is closed. If the name referred to a symbolic link, the link is removed. If the name referred to a socket, FIFO, or device, the name is removed, but processes which have the object open may continue to use it. RETURN VALUE
On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately. ERRORS
The errors that occur are those for unlink(2) and rmdir(2). CONFORMING TO
C89, C99, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001. NOTES
Under libc4 and libc5, remove() was an alias for unlink(2) (and hence would not remove directories). BUGS
Infelicities in the protocol underlying NFS can cause the unexpected disappearance of files which are still being used. SEE ALSO
rm(1), unlink(1), link(2), mknod(2), open(2), rename(2), rmdir(2), unlink(2), mkfifo(3), symlink(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.25 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. GNU
2008-12-03 REMOVE(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy