Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Controlling child processes
Top Forums Programming Controlling child processes Post 50220 by DreamWarrior on Monday 19th of April 2004 12:22:41 PM
Old 04-19-2004
Quote:
Originally posted by Driver
Actually, it's not the stack that limits the usability of signal handlers. Unless you specify your own stack for signal handling (using the sigaltstack() function), its use of memory will be much the same as that of a simple nested function call, including the usual automatic expansion of stack space if its current end is reached.

The real problem ...
That's what I meant, you put it better. I meant that because it can intercept the stack at any time the code running just prior is unknown and therefore the state of the application's data is generally difficult to deduce.

Anyway, as I stated, and you agreed, it is really just personal preference which method is to be used. I dislike signals for such things as this. Besides, which signal do you use, user1/user2 there are no "sync" or "comm" signals. To me it just seems like a bad approach to use signals. But you're right, technically there is no "data" to necessitate a pipe. However one could argue that a signal is just another form a data, just transmitted through a different, and in my opinion less reliable, manner.

Well, for what its worth, don't take this as argumentative because its not meant to be. Debating personal preference is, however, sometimes worthless...so I guess I'll shut up now Smilie.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Controlling processes knowing the PID's

Dear all, suppose that I start a process (named "father"). "father" starts in turns a process called "child" with an execv call (after a fork). In this way "father" will be notified if "chlid" crashes (SIGCHILD mechanism). The problem is: if "father" crashes, how can I do to be recreate a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: npalmentieri
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

what are parent and child processes all about?

I don't follow what these are... this is what my text says... "When a process is started, a duplicate of that process is created. This new process is called the child and the process that created it is called the parent. The child process then replaces the copy for the code the parent... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: xyyz
1 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Parent/Child Processes

Hello. I have a global function name func1() that I am sourcing in from script A. I call the function from script B. Is there a way to find out which script called func1() dynamically so that the func1() can report it in the event there are errors? Thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: yoi2hot4ya
2 Replies

4. Programming

fork() and child processes

Hello, How many child processes are actually created when running this code ? #include <signal.h> #include <stdio.h> int main () { int i ; setpgrp () ; for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { if (fork () == 0) { if ( i & 1 ) setpgrp () ; printf ("Child id: %2d, group: %2d\n", getpid(),... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: green_dot
0 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

fork() and child processes

Hello, How many child processes are actually created when running this code ? #include <signal.h> #include <stdio.h> int main () { int i ; setpgrp () ; for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { if (fork () == 0) { if ( i & 1 ) setpgrp () ; printf ("Child id: %2d, group: %2d\n",... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: green_dot
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

killing all child processes

Hi, Is there a way I can kill all the child processes of a process, given its process id. Many thanks in advance. J. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: superuser84
1 Replies

7. Programming

Controlling a child's stdin/stdout (not working with scp)

All, Ok...so I know I *should* be able to control a process's stdin and stdout from the parent by creating pipes and then dup'ing them in the child. And, this works with all "normal" programs that I've tried. Unfortunately, I want to intercept the stdin/out of the scp application and it seems... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: DreamWarrior
9 Replies

8. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

Controlling AIX processes remotely using a NET app on a Windows server?

I have a .NET application that remotely starts, stops, and gets status of Windows services and scheduled tasks. I would like to add the capability of starting, stopping, and getting status of remote AIX applications also. Based on some preliminary research, one option may be to use 3rd party .NET... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: auser1
0 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Controlling the Number of Child processes

I am trying to implement the below using Ksh script on a Lx machine. There is a file(input_file) with 100K records. For each of these records, certain script(process_rec) needs to be called with the record as input. Sequential processing is time-consuming and parallel processing would eat up... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: APT_3009
2 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Get all child processes of a process

is there a universal way of getting the children of a particular process? i'm looking for a solution that works across different OSes...linux, aix, sunos, hpux. i did a search online and i kept finding answers that were specific to Linux..i.e. pstree. i want to be able to specify a process... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
2 Replies
sigstack(3C)						   Standard C Library Functions 					      sigstack(3C)

NAME
sigstack - set and/or get alternate signal stack context SYNOPSIS
#include <signal.h> int sigstack(struct sigstack *ss, struct sigstack *oss); DESCRIPTION
The sigstack() function allows the calling process to indicate to the system an area of its address space to be used for processing signals received by the process. If the ss argument is not a null pointer, it must point to a sigstack structure. The length of the application-supplied stack must be at least SIGSTKSZ bytes. If the alternate signal stack overflows, the resulting behavior is undefined. (See USAGE below.) o The value of the ss_onstack member indicates whether the process wants the system to use an alternate signal stack when delivering signals. o The value of the ss_sp member indicates the desired location of the alternate signal stack area in the process' address space. o If the ss argument is a null pointer, the current alternate signal stack context is not changed. If the oss argument is not a null pointer, it points to a sigstack structure in which the current alternate signal stack context is placed. The value stored in the ss_onstack member of oss will be non-zero if the process is currently executing on the alternate signal stack. If the oss argument is a null pointer, the current alternate signal stack context is not returned. When a signal's action indicates its handler should execute on the alternate signal stack (specified by calling sigaction(2)), sigstack() checks to see if the process is currently executing on that stack. If the process is not currently executing on the alternate signal stack, the system arranges a switch to the alternate signal stack for the duration of the signal handler's execution. After a successful call to one of the exec functions, there are no alternate signal stacks in the new process image. RETURN VALUES
Upon successful completion, sigstack() returns 0. Otherwise, it returns -1 and sets errno to indicate the error. ERRORS
The sigstack() function will fail if: EPERM An attempt was made to modify an active stack. USAGE
A portable application, when being written or rewritten, should use sigaltstack(2) instead of sigstack(). The direction of stack growth is not indicated in the historical definition of struct sigstack. The only way to portably establish a stack pointer is for the application to determine stack growth direction, or to allocate a block of storage and set the stack pointer to the mid- dle. sigstack() may assume that the size of the signal stack is SIGSTKSZ as found in <signal.h>. An application that would like to specify a signal stack size other than SIGSTKSZ should use sigaltstack(2). Applications should not use longjmp(3C) to leave a signal handler that is running on a stack established with sigstack(). Doing so may dis- able future use of the signal stack. For abnormal exit from a signal handler, siglongjmp(3C), setcontext(2), or swapcontext(3C) may be used. These functions fully support switching from one stack to another. The sigstack() function requires the application to have knowledge of the underlying system's stack architecture. For this reason, sigalt- stack(2) is recommended over this function. SEE ALSO
fork(2), _longjmp(3C), longjmp(3C), setjmp(3C), sigaltstack(2), siglongjmp(3C), sigsetjmp(3C) SunOS 5.10 28 Feb 1996 sigstack(3C)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy