Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: server performance..
Operating Systems HP-UX server performance.. Post 47099 by manduva on Monday 2nd of February 2004 10:38:24 PM
Old 02-02-2004
Hi,

I thought load should always be less than 0.3 for the better performance. And one more thing is, CPU utilization is 99% for the processes ndmcmgr & cdstatm. wudn't this impact the response of the other processes...


Murali
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX and Linux Applications

server/client performance

Ello group, I have general question about how the performance of server/client should be? My server is able to answer about 650times per second. Is it good performance? the apache on the same machine makes 1600/sec BUT there is nine instances of httpd daemon what makes 180/ sec /instance. of... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: tomjan
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

performance of unix server

Hi, I am supposed to run few jobs based on the usage of unix server. How to find out if the server is too busy. what are the commands we can use to find out that. Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: dnat
1 Replies

3. Solaris

Server performance

Hi, i would like to ask if it is possible to get the server load on a solaris machine, but i don't want something like uptime (load average), iostat and vmstat. I would like to get something in percentage like CPU load in %, Disk usage in %, Ram usage in %. I want to collect this data and to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: tafil
3 Replies

4. Solaris

Server performance

Hi, Please advice .. if server is slowness then what are the steps i have to follow... Thanks, Mani (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mani_apr08
5 Replies

5. Infrastructure Monitoring

99% performance wa, slow server.

There is a big problem with the server (VPS based on OpenVZ, CentOS 5, 3GB RAM). The problem is the following. The first 15-20 minutes after starting the server is operating normally, the load average is less than or about 1.0, but then begins to increase sharply% wa, then hovers around 95-99%.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: draiphod
2 Replies

6. Solaris

Server performance bottleneck

hi all, My server box is slow running. I have provide some statistics below: Where is the bottleneck on the server? I guess the bottleneck is disk I/O? bash-3.00# prstat -Z PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP 29206 mobi1 334M 264M sleep ... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: buyantugs
8 Replies

7. AIX

Poor Performance of server

Hi, I am new registered user here in this UNIX forums. I am a new system administrator for AIX 6.1. One of our servers performs poorly every time our application (FINACLE) runs many processes/instances. (see below for topas snapshot) I use NMON or Topas to monitor the server utilization. I... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: guzzelle
9 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Performance of a server

Hi, how can we define performance of a server (Windows or Unix or Linux) ? If processes waiting for CPU (on queue) are usually more than 3 or 5 can we conclude that CPU is not enough for that usage ? Thank you. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: big123456
1 Replies

9. Red Hat

Server performance

Hi Guys, I am running Oracle database on RHEL 2.6.18-164.el5, now I want to check and make sure that my server is performing optimally. I check top: top - 09:45:03 up 2 days, 15:22, 3 users, load average: 2.57, 2.85, 2.77 Tasks: 433 total, 3 running, 430 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Phuti
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Performance Bottleneck in server, Need help

We are wondering if we are facing performance issue in our server when running Informatica jobs. Two things to suspect: cache memory never comes down even when Top shows > 99% used. There is some contention io or network related or Cache is clogged top - 20:58:20 up 16 days, ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: smart_guy471
3 Replies
X11PERFCOMP(1)						      General Commands Manual						    X11PERFCOMP(1)

NAME
x11perfcomp - X11 server performance comparison program SYNTAX
x11perfcomp [ -r | -ro ] [ -l label_file ] files DESCRIPTION
The x11perfcomp program merges the output of several x11perf(1) runs into a nice tabular format. It takes the results in each file, fills in any missing test results if necessary, and for each test shows the objects/second rate of each server. If invoked with the -r or -ro options, it shows the relative performance of each server to the first server. Normally, x11perfcomp uses the first file specified to determine which specific tests it should report on. Some (non-DEC :) servers may fail to perform all tests. In this case, x11perfcomp automatically substitutes in a rate of 0.0 objects/second. Since the first file determines which tests to report on, this file must contain a superset of the tests reported in the other files, else x11perfcomp will fail. You can provide an explicit list of tests to report on by using the -l switch to specify a file of labels. You can create a label file by using the -label option in x11perf. OPTIONS
x11perfcomp accepts the options listed below: -r Specifies that the output should also include relative server performance. -ro Specifies that the output should include only relative server performance. -l label_file Specifies a label file to use. X DEFAULTS
There are no X defaults used by this program. SEE ALSO
X(7), x11perf(1) AUTHORS
Mark Moraes wrote the original scripts to compare servers. Joel McCormack just munged them together a bit. XFree86 Version 4.7.0 X11PERFCOMP(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy