Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: server performance..
Operating Systems HP-UX server performance.. Post 47099 by manduva on Monday 2nd of February 2004 10:38:24 PM
Old 02-02-2004
Hi,

I thought load should always be less than 0.3 for the better performance. And one more thing is, CPU utilization is 99% for the processes ndmcmgr & cdstatm. wudn't this impact the response of the other processes...


Murali
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX and Linux Applications

server/client performance

Ello group, I have general question about how the performance of server/client should be? My server is able to answer about 650times per second. Is it good performance? the apache on the same machine makes 1600/sec BUT there is nine instances of httpd daemon what makes 180/ sec /instance. of... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: tomjan
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

performance of unix server

Hi, I am supposed to run few jobs based on the usage of unix server. How to find out if the server is too busy. what are the commands we can use to find out that. Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: dnat
1 Replies

3. Solaris

Server performance

Hi, i would like to ask if it is possible to get the server load on a solaris machine, but i don't want something like uptime (load average), iostat and vmstat. I would like to get something in percentage like CPU load in %, Disk usage in %, Ram usage in %. I want to collect this data and to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: tafil
3 Replies

4. Solaris

Server performance

Hi, Please advice .. if server is slowness then what are the steps i have to follow... Thanks, Mani (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mani_apr08
5 Replies

5. Infrastructure Monitoring

99% performance wa, slow server.

There is a big problem with the server (VPS based on OpenVZ, CentOS 5, 3GB RAM). The problem is the following. The first 15-20 minutes after starting the server is operating normally, the load average is less than or about 1.0, but then begins to increase sharply% wa, then hovers around 95-99%.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: draiphod
2 Replies

6. Solaris

Server performance bottleneck

hi all, My server box is slow running. I have provide some statistics below: Where is the bottleneck on the server? I guess the bottleneck is disk I/O? bash-3.00# prstat -Z PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP 29206 mobi1 334M 264M sleep ... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: buyantugs
8 Replies

7. AIX

Poor Performance of server

Hi, I am new registered user here in this UNIX forums. I am a new system administrator for AIX 6.1. One of our servers performs poorly every time our application (FINACLE) runs many processes/instances. (see below for topas snapshot) I use NMON or Topas to monitor the server utilization. I... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: guzzelle
9 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Performance of a server

Hi, how can we define performance of a server (Windows or Unix or Linux) ? If processes waiting for CPU (on queue) are usually more than 3 or 5 can we conclude that CPU is not enough for that usage ? Thank you. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: big123456
1 Replies

9. Red Hat

Server performance

Hi Guys, I am running Oracle database on RHEL 2.6.18-164.el5, now I want to check and make sure that my server is performing optimally. I check top: top - 09:45:03 up 2 days, 15:22, 3 users, load average: 2.57, 2.85, 2.77 Tasks: 433 total, 3 running, 430 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Phuti
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Performance Bottleneck in server, Need help

We are wondering if we are facing performance issue in our server when running Informatica jobs. Two things to suspect: cache memory never comes down even when Top shows > 99% used. There is some contention io or network related or Cache is clogged top - 20:58:20 up 16 days, ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: smart_guy471
3 Replies
FSS(7)							   Device and Network Interfaces						    FSS(7)

NAME
FSS - Fair share scheduler DESCRIPTION
The fair share scheduler (FSS) guarantees application performance by explicitly allocating shares of CPU resources to projects. A share indicates a project's entitlement to available CPU resources. Because shares are meaningful only in comparison with other project's shares, the absolute quantity of shares is not important. Any number that is in proportion with the desired CPU entitlement can be used. The goals of the FSS scheduler differ from the traditional time-sharing scheduling class (TS). In addition to scheduling individual LWPs, the FSS scheduler schedules projects against each other, making it impossible for any project to acquire more CPU cycles simply by running more processes concurrently. A project's entitlement is individually calculated by FSS independently for each processor set if the project contains processes bound to them. If a project is running on more than one processor set, it can have different entitlements on every set. A project's entitlement is defined as a ratio between the number of shares given to a project and the sum of shares of all active projects running on the same proces- sor set. An active project is one that has at least one running or runnable process. Entitlements are recomputed whenever any project becomes active or inactive, or whenever the number of shares is changed. Processor sets represent virtual machines in the FSS scheduling class and processes are scheduled independently in each processor set. That is, processes compete with each other only if they are running on the same processor set. When a processor set is destroyed, all processes that were bound to it are moved to the default processor set, which always exists. Empty processor sets (that is, sets without processors in them) have no impact on the FSS scheduler behavior. If a processor set contains a mix of TS/IA and FSS processes, the fairness of the FSS scheduling class can be compromised because these classes use the same range of priorities. Fairness is most significantly affected if processes running in the TS scheduling class are CPU- intensive and are bound to processors within the processor set. As a result, you should avoid having processes from TS/IA and FSS classes share the same processor set. RT and FSS processes use disjoint priority ranges and therefore can share processor sets. As projects execute, their CPU usage is accumulated over time. The FSS scheduler periodically decays CPU usages of every project by multi- plying it with a decay factor, ensuring that more recent CPU usage has greater weight when taken into account for scheduling. The FSS scheduler continually adjusts priorities of all processes to make each project's relative CPU usage converge with its entitlement. While FSS is designed to fairly allocate cycles over a long-term time period, it is possible that projects will not receive their allocated shares worth of CPU cycles due to uneven demand. This makes one-shot, instantaneous analysis of FSS performance data unreliable. Note that share is not the same as utilization. A project may be allocated 50% of the system, although on the average, it uses just 20%. Shares serve to cap a project's CPU usage only when there is competition from other projects running on the same processor set. When there is no competition, utilization may be larger than entitlement based on shares. Allocating a small share to a busy project slows it down but does not prevent it from completing its work if the system is not saturated. The configuration of CPU shares is managed by the name server as a property of the project(4) database. In the following example, an entry in the /etc/project file sets the number of shares for project "x-files" to 10: x-files:100::::project.cpu-shares=(privileged,10,none) Projects with undefined number of shares are given one share each. This means that such projects are treated with equal importance. Projects with 0 shares only run when there are no projects with non-zero shares competing for the same processor set. The maximum number of shares that can be assigned to one project is 65535. You can use the prctl(1) command to determine the current share assignment for a given project: $ prctl -n project.cpu-shares -i project x-files or to change the amount of shares if you have root privileges: # prctl -r -n project.cpu-shares -v 5 -i project x-files See the prctl(1) man page for additional information on how to modify and examine resource controls associated with active processes, tasks, or projects on the system. See resource_controls(5) for a description of the resource controls supported in the current release of the Solaris operating system. By default, project "system" (project ID 0) includes all system daemons started by initialization scripts and has an "unlimited" amount of shares. That is, it is always scheduled first no matter how many shares are given to other projects. The following command sets FSS as the default scheduler for the system: # dispadmin -d FSS This change will take effect on the next reboot. Alternatively, you can move processes from the time-share scheduling class (as well as the special case of init) into the FSS class without changing your default scheduling class and rebooting by becoming root, and then using the priocntl(1) command, as shown in the following example: # priocntl -s -c FSS -i class TS # priocntl -s -c FSS -i pid 1 CONFIGURING SCHEDULER WITH DISPADMIN
You can use the dispadmin(1M) command to examine and "tune" the FSS scheduler's time quantum value. Time quantum is the amount of time that a thread is allowed to run before it must relinquish the processor. The following example dumps the current time quantum for the fair share scheduler: $ dispadmin -g -c FSS # # Fair Share Scheduler Configuration # RES=1000 # # Time Quantum # QUANTUM=110 The value of the QUANTUM represents some fraction of a second with the fractional value determied by the reciprocal value of RES. With the default value of RES = 1000, the reciprocal of 1000 is .001, or milliseconds. Thus, by default, the QUANTUM value represents the time quan- tum in milliseconds. If you change the RES value using dispadmin with the -r option, you also change the QUANTUM value. For example, instead of quantum of 110 with RES of 1000, a quantum of 11 with a RES of 100 results. The fractional unit is different while the amount of time is the same. You can use the -s option to change the time quantum value. Note that such changes are not preserved across reboot. Please refer to the dispadmin(1M) man page for additional information. ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | |Architecture |SUNWcsu | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ SEE ALSO
prctl(1), priocntl(1), dispadmin(1M), psrset(1M), priocntl(2), project(4), attributes(5), resource_controls(5) System Administration Guide: N1 Grid Containers, Resource Management, and Solaris Zones SunOS 5.10 1 Oct 2004 FSS(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy