Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Not on System Console; Connection to host lost. Post 4598 by andrec on Friday 27th of July 2001 04:11:58 AM
Old 07-27-2001
Not on System Console; Connection to host lost.

hi all,
When I telnet my W2k machine to my Solaris8 machine, after typing my login name and password prompt, I get the following msg immediately.
====
Not on System Console.
Connection to host lost.
====
The 2 machines are connected on the same kingston workgroup hub. Can someone pls help?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

connection to host lost

Hi all, I am connecting to a unix host from NT workstation via telnet. After working for around two hours I get the message "connection to host lost" What could the problem be? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: nbiketi
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Connection Lost from Unix Server....

This morning I was working by Xwindow to my unix server (hp-ux, 11 version), without any problem but this afteernoon, the connections was refused, and triying to connect using telnet, sometimes I can establish the connection and refuses me in a minute, the error message that appears is "your... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: fvicente
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Connection to host lost

I keep receiving this message when trying to connect using telnet to SunOS 5.8 running Solaris 8 from W2k. I checked system and inetd.conf and they seem to be ok. I can ping the host ok. ftp also works fine. Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: goose
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

console connection to ultra 2

I have a ultra 2 enterprise server without a video card. I tried to connect my PC to the sun box through console ports using hyperterminal with the standard setting(9600, 8, N, 1) but failed. The cable I used is a DB9 female--DB25 male null modem cable. Using the same setting and cable, I could... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: yongmeic
1 Replies

5. Debian

Killing host connection

Hi All Is there a command (or set of commands) that can be used to kill a connection listed in the netstat table? Say there is a host connected to a certain port on your machine, and it is listed via a 'netstat -an', is there a way to issue some commands to 'disconnect' or kill that connection? ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: saabir
5 Replies

6. HP-UX

SCP transfer failed, lost connection

Hello, We try to do an SCP of a Sybase dump file of 4Go between two production HP-UX servers. Each time the transfer stopn at 299Mo and we have the message "connection lost". The destination FS has largefiles option activated. Could you help ? (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: ohemeg
7 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host Connection closed

Hi Everyone, Good day. Scenario: 2 unix servers -- A (SunOS) and B (AIX) I have an ftp script to sftp 30 files from A to B which happen almost instantaneously i.e 30 sftp's happen at the same time. Some of these sftp's fail with the following error: ssh_exchange_identification: Connection... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jeevan_fimare
1 Replies

8. Solaris

ILOM - lost connection

Hello, In my server Sun Enterprise T5140 I have unusual problem with ILOM. After several, several days, I can not connect to the ILOM. For connection to the ILOM I turn off the server power and then turn it on. Where is the problem? Regards (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: bieszczaders
10 Replies

9. Solaris

Problem with Console Connection

I'm having a problem establishing a console connection between a V240 and a V440. I verified and re verified the connection was in the correct places. Commands: # tip hardwire connected Nothing happens after that. Other V440's work fine with the receiving the connection. Is there a... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: adelsin
8 Replies

10. Ubuntu

[TCPDUMP] Connection lost

I'm on Ubuntu – but it's the same on Debian. I'm using tcpdump in order to track the connection of computers on my private network. At some point, the internet connection of the computers launching the script is lost as well as the targeted computers. Here's the command line: tcpdump -i wlan0... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Skirmjan
0 Replies
HOSTS.EQUIV(5)						      BSD File Formats Manual						    HOSTS.EQUIV(5)

NAME
hosts.equiv, .rhosts -- trusted remote hosts and host-user pairs DESCRIPTION
The hosts.equiv and .rhosts files list hosts and users which are ``trusted'' by the local host when a connection is made via rlogind(8), rshd(8), or any other server that uses ruserok(3). This mechanism bypasses password checks, and is required for access via rsh(1). Each line of these files has the format: hostname [username] The hostname may be specified as a host name (typically a fully qualified host name in a DNS environment) or address, +@netgroup (from which only the host names are checked), or a ``+'' wildcard (allow all hosts). The username, if specified, may be given as a user name on the remote host, +@netgroup (from which only the user names are checked), or a ``+'' wildcard (allow all remote users). If a username is specified, only that user from the specified host may login to the local machine. If a username is not specified, any user may login with the same user name. EXAMPLES
somehost A common usage: users on somehost may login to the local host as the same user name. somehost username The user username on somehost may login to the local host. If specified in /etc/hosts.equiv, the user may login with only the same user name. +@anetgroup username The user username may login to the local host from any machine listed in the netgroup anetgroup. + + + Two severe security hazards. In the first case, allows a user on any machine to login to the local host as the same user name. In the second case, allows any user on any machine to login to the local host (as any user, if in /etc/hosts.equiv). WARNINGS
The username checks provided by this mechanism are not secure, as the remote user name is received by the server unchecked for validity. Therefore this mechanism should only be used in an environment where all hosts are completely trusted. A numeric host address instead of a host name can help security considerations somewhat; the address is then used directly by iruserok(3). When a username (or netgroup, or +) is specified in /etc/hosts.equiv, that user (or group of users, or all users, respectively) may login to the local host as any local user. Usernames in /etc/hosts.equiv should therefore be used with extreme caution, or not at all. A .rhosts file must be owned by the user whose home directory it resides in, and must be writable only by that user. Logins as root only check root's .rhosts file; the /etc/hosts.equiv file is not checked for security. Access permitted through root's .rhosts file is typically only for rsh(1), as root must still login on the console for an interactive login such as rlogin(1). FILES
/etc/hosts.equiv Global trusted host-user pairs list ~/.rhosts Per-user trusted host-user pairs list SEE ALSO
rcp(1), rlogin(1), rsh(1), rcmd(3), ruserok(3), netgroup(5) HISTORY
The .rhosts file format appeared in 4.2BSD. BUGS
The ruserok(3) implementation currently skips negative entries (preceded with a ``-'' sign) and does not treat them as ``short-circuit'' neg- ative entries. BSD
November 26, 1997 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy