Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Opinion
Contact Us Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators Opinion Post 45366 by kduffin on Thursday 18th of December 2003 04:51:02 PM
Old 12-18-2003
For myself, I take no pleasure in flaming others; quite the opposite. I had teachers that were patient with me, and I try to emulate their examples. At the same time, the purpose of the unix.com (as I understand it) is to expand everyone's knowledge, not just to solve a problem that has no other effort thrown after it than a mere forum posting.

I hope people come here, learn and then springboard beyond. Too often people learn a "trick" or a quick "solution" to a problem, but never gain a conceptual understanding and are therefore doomed to always being dependent on the knowledge of others.

Cheers,

Keith
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

Need your help and opinion

Hey all, I'm brand new to Unix/Linux and have a couple of questions. I own a small education/consulting company that has a staff of approx. 50 employees. Most our work is geared towards the office-style environment (i.e. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, etc.). There are also some C and Java programmers... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dennie1
4 Replies

2. Solaris

Your Opinion requested

Ladies/Gentlemen, I am looking for a web-based tool to keep track of my Sun inventory. The following list of fields are fields I would like to store: Root Passwd (needs to be secure) / Hostid / Console Port / IP Address / Platform / Application / Hostname . . . you get the point. Do any of... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: pc9456
4 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

second opinion on sed script

i'm trying to figure out a script that uses sed, and i'm not totally sure if it does what I think it does. The script... - takes in 3 inputs, $1, $2 are names. $3 is a file. - filename is a file. Here is what I'm trying to figure out: cat $3 | grep "id17" > var2 sed "s|@@.*||g" var2 >... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gammaman
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Opinion on modification for SMARTMON

Hello, I get the following in one of my error logs: Device /dev/sda, SATA disks accessed via libata are not currently supported by smartmontools. When libata is given an ATA pass-thru ioctl() then an additional '-d libata' device type will be added to smartmontools. --------------- I... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mojoman
0 Replies

5. UNIX and Linux Applications

Opinion on modification for SMARTMON

Hello, I get the following in one of my error logs: Device /dev/sda, SATA disks accessed via libata are not currently supported by smartmontools. When libata is given an ATA pass-thru ioctl() then an additional '-d libata' device type will be added to smartmontools. --------------- ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mojoman
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Expert Opinion

This perhaps does not belong in ths category; apologies, however, we have a heated debate going and your input will decide the result. Should UNIX (HP, AIX, etc) be rebooted following a monthly cycle (Every month, or a qtr, etc.). We have some UX admins (grumps) who say they have seen a UX... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: rsheikh
6 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Expert opinion on iptables/torrents

Hello all, I want to deny any torrents passing thru linux box that are NOT encrypted. My ISP is doing packet inspection and gives warnings. I'd like to allow torrents when client sets encryption. Any thoughts? (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: darkman_hr
5 Replies

8. What is on Your Mind?

Something in my mind - what's your opinion ?

Dear Forum staff / Advisors / members , I am having something in my mind, about Linux / Unix possible Interview questions collections, I guess if I post them here,which might be useful for our members and for students, and in meantime we can discuss also about those questions, what's your... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Akshay Hegde
4 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Opinion on an easy shell script (mv)

:wall:I've this simple code: STF=/opt/aaa cat $STF | nice sort -u > $STF.new && mv $STF.new $STF Which works until today. What happened is that this script has been corrupted the FS, so I've to use fschk to repair the filesystem. I presume the move command executed just a little too early... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: accolito
1 Replies

10. AIX

[Opinion] A Public Answer To Rob McNelly

Why Do We Need Root on the HMC? In this article in IBMSystems Magazine Rob McNelly asked the question Why Don't We Have Root on the HMC? and he goes on to justify why we indeed shouldn't have root - kinda. I think his arguments are not as valid as he perhaps thinks they are and what's more... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
11 Replies
mccs(1) 						       Debian User's Manual							   mccs(1)

NAME
mccs - package dependency solver SYNOPSIS
mccs [options] DESCRIPTION
mccs (which stands for Multi Criteria CUDF Solver) is a solver for package dependency problems expressed in the CUDF format. By default, mccs reads a problem specification from standard input, and writes the solution to standard output. OPTIONS FOR CONTROLLING INPUT
/OUTPUT -i file Read input from file file instead of standard input. -o file Write the solution to file instead of standard output. -fo full solution output -v n set verbosity level to n. -h print this help OPTIONS FOR SELECTING THE SOLVER ENGINE
By default, mccs uses the cbc solving engine. -lpsolve use lpsolve solver -lp lpsolver specify a solving engine that takes the cplex input format. lpsolver is the path of a script that takes as input the file name con- taining the cplex input, and that produces the solution on standard output (an example for scip is given in /usr/share/doc/mccs/engines/sciplp). -pblib pbsolver use pseudo-Boolean solver pbsolver as solving engine. -nosolve do not solve the problem (for debugging) OPTIONS FOR CONTROLLING CONSTRAINT GENERATION
-noreduce do not reduce the initial problem -only-agregate-constraints generate only agregate constraints -only-desagregate-constraints generate only deagregate constraints (default) -all-constraints generate all kind of constraints (ensure redundancy) OPTIONS FOR CONTROLLING OPTIMIZATION
See the file /usr/share/doc/mccs/README.optimization-criteria for a full grammar of optimization criteria. EXAMPLES
An example input file can be found at /usr/share/doc/mccs/examples/legacy.cudf. mccs -i legacy.cudf calls mccs on examples/legacy.cudf and prints the solution on stdout. With such a call mccs will resort to the default underlying solver cbc and use a default criterion to solve the problem. mccs -i legacy.cudf -o sol -lexagregate[-removed,-changed] -lpsolve Here, mccs puts the solution into the file "sol" and solves the problem using the lpsolve solver with the paranoid criterion, which con- sists of first minimizing the number of removed packaged, and then the number of packages that change installation status or installed ver- sion. mccs -i legacy.cudf -o sol -lexsemiagregate[-removed,-notuptodate, -nunsat[recommends:,true],-new] The criterion used here is the trendy criterion, which consists of first minimizing the number of package removals, then to minimize the number of installed packages that are installed in a version older the most recent available version, then to minimize the number of recom- mendations of installed packages that are not satisfied, and finally the number of newly installed packages. AUTHOR
mccs has been written by Claude Michel <cpjm@polytech.unice.fr>. The development of mccs has been partly supported by the European research project Mancoosi. 9 May 2011 mccs(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy