Sponsored Content
Operating Systems OS X (Apple) Is Mac OS X Server Really Powerful? Post 45089 by jsilva on Monday 15th of December 2003 05:47:01 AM
Old 12-15-2003
Hi,

What will be the role of the server ? What do you want to do ? Is high availability critical ?

You're trying to compare differente architectures, you'll have to make some tests ( or try to find someone who has made them already ) to find what is fastest/better solution to suit your needs.
 

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Any way to make scp more powerful?

Hello, I'm writing a script to automate the delivery of our code to different target environments and I was wondering if there's any way to cut down on the number of authentications that are needed. The script has to deliver to three different boxes (two directories on two boxes and one... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: pallak7
11 Replies

2. What is on Your Mind?

Boy, is the shell powerful.

Reading replies to questions, as an amateur, I have learnt a lot from you pros on here. The shell in any of its guises is serioulsy poweful. With so many transient and resident commands at one's disposal is there anything, non-GUI, that cannot be done inside a default shell and terminal? ... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
12 Replies
X11PERFCOMP(1)						      General Commands Manual						    X11PERFCOMP(1)

NAME
x11perfcomp - X11 server performance comparison program SYNTAX
x11perfcomp [ -r | -ro ] [ -l label_file ] files DESCRIPTION
The x11perfcomp program merges the output of several x11perf(1) runs into a nice tabular format. It takes the results in each file, fills in any missing test results if necessary, and for each test shows the objects/second rate of each server. If invoked with the -r or -ro options, it shows the relative performance of each server to the first server. Normally, x11perfcomp uses the first file specified to determine which specific tests it should report on. Some (non-DEC :) servers may fail to perform all tests. In this case, x11perfcomp automatically substitutes in a rate of 0.0 objects/second. Since the first file determines which tests to report on, this file must contain a superset of the tests reported in the other files, else x11perfcomp will fail. You can provide an explicit list of tests to report on by using the -l switch to specify a file of labels. You can create a label file by using the -label option in x11perf. OPTIONS
x11perfcomp accepts the options listed below: -r Specifies that the output should also include relative server performance. -ro Specifies that the output should include only relative server performance. -l label_file Specifies a label file to use. X DEFAULTS
There are no X defaults used by this program. SEE ALSO
X(7), x11perf(1) AUTHORS
Mark Moraes wrote the original scripts to compare servers. Joel McCormack just munged them together a bit. X Version 11 x11perf 1.5.4 X11PERFCOMP(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy