Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Installing php-4.3.3-2.i386.rpm Post 43635 by djtrippin on Thursday 20th of November 2003 02:47:01 AM
Old 11-20-2003
strange, works for me
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Installing database through RPM

Hi everyone I have just joined a software developing team. I am new to unix. Basically we are developing a product, the problem is when the end user will install this package we would like to install the datbase associated with our product using RPM. Can it be done? how secure it is? and... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: atul.saxena
0 Replies

2. HP-UX

Urgent Help needed for Installing RPM on HP-UX

I am working on a HP-UX PARISC 64 architecture. I am trying to install RPM but without success. Has any body successfully installed RPM on the above architecture. I couldnt find a compatible depot file. I tried to compile the source code for rpm-4.0 package. All the dependencies are... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sjcekk
3 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

User installing a rpm package

Hi, I have an application to be installed and I want a user to be able to install it. But I meet the following issues: Removing MyApp error: cannot get exclusive lock on /var/lib/rpm/Packages error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - Operation not permitted (1) error: cannot open... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: potro
1 Replies

4. Ubuntu

Grub rescue problem after installing ubuntu 10.04 amd64 after i386

Hi all, I have Windows XP dual boot with Ubuntu 8.10 on my system. I brought in a portable HDD on which I installed Ubuntu 10.04 32-bit. The grub boot loader was installed along with this and to boot windows, I've had to plug in the HDD (with lucid install) everytime. It had been working fine.... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: morningSunshine
0 Replies

5. Red Hat

Installing rpm packages

Hi guys, I am trying to install some packages for my oracle 11g r2 installation, the below error shows up when I try below: warning: glibc-devel-2.5-24.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 37017186 error: Failed dependencies: glibc-headers is needed by... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: messi777
8 Replies

6. Red Hat

installing rpm from ISO

Hi, I would like to know is it possible to install rpm along its depedable rpm from mounted .iso image on Redhat Linux while installing rpm it is showing so many depandancy, so I would like to know with single command wheather it will take all depedable rpm from mounted iso image. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: manoj.solaris
1 Replies

7. Red Hat

Installing rpm in centos 6

hi, i am try to install a package in centos 6.2 x86-64 but unable to find any package in centos media iso. In RHEL we have a product folder which contain all the list of rpm but in centos i cant found that. I have use yum command but it also cant work show me the message no module named yum.... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: zeeshan047
1 Replies

8. AIX

Problem Installing Apache from rpm

I am attempting to install an rpm of Apache from perzl.org on an AIX 6100-07-03-1207 server and it is failing. I think I have all of the dependencies installed. Can anyone help? Any help would be appreciated. It fails with the following error: # rpm -Uvh httpd-2.4.2-2.aix5.1.ppc.rpm ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lbholde
3 Replies

9. AIX

Issue with installing rpm in AIX 6.1

I am trying to install an rpm : libiconv-1.14-1.aix5.1.ppc.rpm which is a dependency to install GIT. While I gave the command I got the foll message: root:user-> $ rpm -i -v libiconv-1.14-1.aix5.1.ppc.rpm libiconv-1.14-1 ar: Cannot open or remove a file containing a running program.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: gaugeta
2 Replies

10. Red Hat

Installing PHP tools using RPM in Redhat Linux

Hi there, I am trying to install few PHP tools in my Linux server by creating RPMs from source ( tar.gz) files. The issue here is that the tar.gz files does not have a configure file and so I am not able to do ./configure make install opertations. I tried downloading src.rpms of these tools,... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vicky81
0 Replies
Module::Install::FAQ(3) 				User Contributed Perl Documentation				   Module::Install::FAQ(3)

NAME
Module::Install::FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions for Module::Install DESCRIPTION
Though Module::Install itself has a general FAQ section in the pod, it's more for advocacy. Here's an incomplete and growing list of the actual questions I have been frequently asked (or found on the net) about Module::Install. Do I also have to update my CPAN modules every time Module::Install is updated? The point of Module::Install is let module authors take care of everything related to updating toolchains for the sake of module users. So, if you choose to use Module::Install, it's you who should update toolchains, i.e. Module::Install and other bundled modules. You should check if there's any significant change/fix in your toolchains. You should check if your toolchains go along with other tools users use to install your distributions, or with the systems users are in, or whatever that matters. In the end, you are expected to have much more knowledge and willingness than average users. That being said, practically, you don't have to update your distributions if they are working well. But if you do find issues, please update your distributions, even when you have nothing to change in your own modules. Module::Install is not only a tool to write better, but also a tool to encourage you to help others. Do I really have to avoid auto_install()? Not at all, using "auto_install()" is just fine. While it indeed behaved erratically in older Module::Install versions, there have been no reported issues since mid-2009. As far as compatbility with various CPAN clients: several rather large projects on CPAN (including Catalyst and DBIx::Class), are using "auto_install" without any issues reported by their substantial userbases. That said, if all you want to do is make it easy for a contributor to checkout your code and quickly install necessary dependencies, there are alternatives to "auto_install". If your CPAN module is new enough, you can pass a dot to the cpan command it provides, and it will install all the required distributions from the CPAN: $ cpan . The same is true for the cpanm command from App::cpanminus, with which you even can write like "cpanm --installdeps ." Should I put an "inc" directory Module::Install automatically creates into a repository for my projects? Depends. If the repository is private and only for you, you usually don't want to put it in your repository to let you always use the latest Module::Install you have (the "inc" directory is recreated each time you run "perl Makefile.PL"). If not, but you alone are the release manager and know what you have to do when you release, putting the "inc" directory into your repository may help other casual contributors, especially if you use minor (or private) non-core extensions in your Makefile.PL. However, if you generously allow other people to release, or you're not so familiar with how Module::Install works and don't know what you have to do in the above situation, don't put it in the repository. It may be the cause of troubles including a wrong version in the "META.yml". If you feel sorry about the inconvenience for your fellow contributors, you may want to add explicitly "use Module::Install::<ExtensionYouWantToUse>;" after "use inc::Module::Install;" in your Makefile.PL. It doesn't do any harm, and it makes clear which extensions they need to install. What're there in the "inc" directory? Module::Install puts its components (sometimes with extra modules) under the "inc" directory to be released with a distribution. Those modules will not be installed into your system, unless explicitly copied into somewhere. They are only used to help configuration, tests, and/or installation. If there's no "inc" directory, Module::Install will automatically create it when you run "perl Makefile.PL". And if that happens, a directory (as of this writing, ".author") will also be created under the "inc" directory. If the ".author" directory exists, the "inc" directory will be recreated each time you run "perl Makefile.PL" to make sure everything you need is included and up-to-date. This ".author" directory will not be included in a distribution. "perl Makefile.PL" doesn't work or does a strange behavior for me. Why? Module::Install uses an Autoloader magic to delegate command handling to the extensions in the "inc" directory. This works while everything is in order, but when it finds something it can't understands, it dies with a compile error, or does what you don't expect. To prevent the latter strange behavior, Module::Install 0.96 and above dies when it tries to process unknown commands. In most cases (other than typos), these unknown commands are from non-core extensions on the CPAN, and they should hopefully have predictable names that you can easily tell from which extension they come, though some may be a bit hard to find. If you are trying to contribute to some project, and having a trouble to run "Makefile.PL", please contact the author of the project to learn what you have to install. If the distribution is already on the CPAN, you may also want to look into the MANIFEST file to see which extensions are included in the "inc" directory before you ask. This usually does not happen in the user land as distributions that use Module::Install should have all the necessary extensions under the "inc" directory. If this should happen, that's most probably because the release manager shipped the distribution under a non-author mode. Please contact the author to fix the issue. Why can't I do <anything> with Module::Install that I can do with ExtUtils::MakeMaker? Module::Install is just a wrapper of ExtUtils::MakeMaker. You can do almost everything you can do with ExtUtils::MakeMaker by passing arbitrary attributes to ExtUtils::MakeMaker in the backend via "makemaker_args" like this: use inc::Module::Install; all_from 'lib/Foo/Bar.pm'; makemaker_args( dist => { PREOP => '...' }, PL_FILES => {'bin/foobar.PL' => 'bin/foobar'}, ); WriteAll; However, by the singleton nature of Module::Install, it may fail to process Makefile.PLs in subdirectories correctly now, and you may need to override attributes explicitly in some cases where Module::Install provides other default values than ExtUtils::MakeMaker does. Please see also the ExtUtils::MakeMaker's pod for further instructions. I added MyMakefile.PL to my distribution, but it doesn't work as I expected. Why? ExtUtils::MakeMaker (and Module::Build also) treats "*.PL" files in the top level directory as something special to generate other files. So, if you add something that has ".PL" extension like "MyMakefile.PL" in the top level directory, it also runs automatically when you run Makefile.PL. If you don't like this behavior, use "makemaker_args" to pass an anonymous hash to "PL_FILES". makemaker_args(PL_FILES => {}); AUTHOR
Kenichi Ishigaki <ishigaki@cpan.org> COPYRIGHT
Copyright 2010 Kenichi Ishigaki. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. perl v5.16.3 2012-03-01 Module::Install::FAQ(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy