10-01-2003
If it works fine, what is your problem then?
What would you like us to help you with?
Regs David
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. IP Networking
I have two networks connected by cisco routers. My first subnet is 192.168.0.0 and my second is 192.168.1.0.
My SCO unix machine is on the 192.168.1.0 subnet with an IP of 192.168.1.231. It can see the entire .1.0 subnet but nothing on the other network.
My cicso router(gateway) to the other... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: agoodrich
6 Replies
2. HP-UX
Hi,
My H-UX box has the GW pointing to 10.10.10.1 and I need add it a new route pointing to 192.168.80.x with the GW 10.10.10.13
I tried with:
#route add 192.168.80.2 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.13
but I get: add net 192.168.80.0: gateway 255.255.255.0: Network is unreachable
I tried with... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: efrenba
4 Replies
3. IP Networking
I have a system that i want to reach via a vpn created vi a fierwall.The fierwall in an other system.
The ip i am trying to get to is 172.16.4.48
I need to get to it via the hme1 interface.
The vpn gateway has this ip 172.30.50.1
I need to clean up the routing table and make this work; or is it... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: waterboy
5 Replies
4. Solaris
Hi,
I am trying to add route command in Solaris 10 machine in the following fashion:
route add -host 10.8.112.10 180.144.1.250 -interface lo0:1
this command fails with an error "lo0:1: bad value"
I want to add a route to 10.8.112.10 that picks 180.144.1.250 as the gateway via the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sudhir_shet
3 Replies
5. IP Networking
I have built a new linux server, via a iLo connection.
and I am trying to connect via my desktop to the server I have just built to the management port eth0 via putty.
Please could some one advise how to connect to this server from my desktop. Do i need to create add a route access on the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: venhart
0 Replies
6. Solaris
Hey Guys:
I am trying to add a route for assign a network interface to the traffic to/from a specific net, but allways to get the same system message : network is unreacheable
root@ColectorDMSCNT # route add net 200.44.46.0/24 161.196.84.196 1
add net 200.44.46.0/24: gateway... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: aggadtech08
2 Replies
7. Solaris
Hi need to add 2 routes, one on each server.
I know the route add comand but I have always been given the parameters to put in.
I need a route in each of the 2 following servers to be able to ping and ssh between them. But how do i know which netmask to put in the route add command ?
In... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: vettec3
6 Replies
8. Solaris
I need to add a new route on solaris10 machine.
I want that all traffic on the 23 port (telnet) use 192.168.200.1 gateway.
How I do ?
Thank you in advance. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: arfry
1 Replies
9. Solaris
Hi Solaris Experts,
I am trying to add a routing table entry on our 5.1 Generic_144488-12 sun4v sparc Solaris 10 SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220 so that it is possible to ping 10.56.9.34 node
# netstat -rnv
IRE Table: IPv4
Destination Mask Gateway Device Mxfrg Rtt Ref
Flg Out In/Fwd ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: gjackson123
2 Replies
10. IP Networking
Add explicit route to 10.128.255.41/32 , gateway: 10.128.201.254
if not working, please try gateway through management port: 10.128.55.254
Just want to double confirm if this would be the correct command
#route add -net 10.128.255.41/32 10.128.201.254
And if didnt work
#route add... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Thilagarajan
1 Replies
privgrp(5) File Formats Manual privgrp(5)
NAME
privgrp - HP-UX group privileges
DESCRIPTION
HP-UX allows subletting of limited superuser-like privileges to all users or to members of a particular group or groups. This capability
is deprecated and only existing applications should use it. The newer fine-grained privilege facilities described in privileges(5) should
be used by new applications.
The header defines the following symbolic privilege names: and
All but one of the group privileges are supported as fine-grained privileges and described in privileges(5). The one group privilege not
supported as a fine-grained privilege is:
Permits the use of the
and system calls for changing respectively the real user ID and real group ID of a process (see setuid(2)). This
behavior of is deprecated and only legacy applications should use it. Newer applications should use and respec-
tively, to achieve the same effect. (No special privileges required.)
The header defines two additional symbolic constants:
defines the maximum number of groups with special privileges.
Of this maximum, one is reserved for global privileges (granted to all processes) and the remainder can be assigned
to actual group IDs.
defines the size of the multi-word mask used
in defining privileges associated with a group ID.
The and commands and the and system calls may be used to define and query the privilege group associations.
The group privileges are automatically initialized from the contents of (see privgrp(4)) at boot time.
WARNINGS
This mechanism is deprecated and only legacy applications should use it. See privileges(5) for a description of fine-grained privileges.
SEE ALSO
getprivgrp(1), setprivgrp(1M), chown(2), getprivgrp(2), lockf(2), mpctl(2), plock(2), pset_create(2), rtprio(2), rtsched(2), serialize(2),
setgid(2), setuid(2), shmctl(2), privgrp(4), privileges(5).
privgrp(5)