Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Disksuite questions
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Disksuite questions Post 39827 by finster on Monday 1st of September 2003 10:31:39 AM
Old 09-01-2003
I am confused as to the state of disk before creationg DB replicas? Should the whole disk(each slice) be unassigned?

What should the disk look like before adding replicas?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

DiskSuite: Breaking mirrors.

Ok, so I have a remote system (7 states away) that's using SDS to manage the two 18 gig disks. /, swap, /var, /home, and /opt. The mirroring procedure I created uses installboot to ensure there's a bootblk on both disks of an SDS mirror. The system has a problem booting (can't write to... (21 Replies)
Discussion started by: BOFH
21 Replies

2. Solaris

Solstice DiskSuite

Has anybody every used Solstice DiskSuite? I am having trouble setting it up. I installed it without a problem, but do I really have to blow away the drives on the D1000 just to create a metastate database? (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: hshapiro
8 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

disksuite and raidctl used together

I have a live Sunfire v440 server with 4 drives and I want to mirror drive 0 & 1 to 2 & 3. The on-board raid controller only allows for 1 live mirror. I was thinking of disksuite, but unfortunately the second disk is just one large partition with no free slices. I was thinking of using... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: csgonan
0 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Solaris 10 disksuite

We recently got a third party in to upgrade our solaris 8 sparc server to solaris 10. A few month later I now have a disk mirror problem that I would normally fix by going into the GUI screen "metatool" It appears that the third party didn't install disksuite after the upgrade. Does anyone know... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: miredale
10 Replies

5. Solaris

DiskSuite dilemma

Hello, We have this system a SunFire 280R running Solaris 8 Generic_117350-46. It has 2 36GB disks in it. They are mirrored with DiskSuite 4.2.1. When we execute a metastat all the devices report an Okay status, but when we go into metatool everything is in the Critical (maintenance)... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mgb
4 Replies

6. Solaris

mirroring with disksuite

hi all, i want to mirror two disks with disksuite under solaris 9 , doses smeone can explain me Briefly the essential steps to do that plz ? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lid-j-one
3 Replies

7. Solaris

Looking for Solstice DiskSuite 4.2

Hi all, Do you know where I can download Soltice Disksuite 4.2 for Solaris 2.6 ? I haven't the CD labeled “Solaris Server Intranet Extensions 1.0” . Thanks in advance for your precious help. Bests Regards Hosni (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hosni
2 Replies

8. Solaris

Disksuite mirror expansion

Hi I had a disksuite mirror with two sub-mirrors which I wanted to expand. To expand this I had the bright idea of detaching one of the sub-mirrors and doing a metaclear on that submirror - then re-sized the underlying partition ( doubling it in size ) then I did a metainit on this partition as... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: ianc1234
6 Replies

9. Solaris

disksuite mirroring d0 to d2 and d1 to d3

I have a SOlaris 10 v240 server. I'm installing disksuite to mirror the root drive D0 to D2. I also have one partition on disk 1 that I want to mirror to D3. I am not using ZFS right now. Can I add that to my initial mirroring configuration or can I only mirror 1 drive to 1 drive? Can I... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: csross
2 Replies

10. Solaris

Disksuite question

Hello all, I have a Solaris Disksuite question :- I will be adding 4 new drives to an E250 server and need will be configuring 2 striped volumes each consisting 2 new disks with SVM. In the end i will have 2 volumes each of 72gb. So in effect i will have 1 volume called D7 and another volume... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: commandline
6 Replies
funidx(7)							SAORD Documentation							 funidx(7)

NAME
Funidx - Using Indexes to Filter Rows in a Table SYNOPSIS
This document contains a summary of the user interface for filtering rows in binary tables with indexes. DESCRIPTION
Funtools Table Filtering allows rows in a table to be selected based on the values of one or more columns in the row. Because the actual filter code is compiled on the fly, it is very efficient. However, for very large files (hundreds of Mb or larger), evaluating the filter expression on each row can take a long time. Therefore, funtools supports index files for columns, which are used automatically during fil- tering to reduce dramatically the number of row evaluations performed. The speed increase for indexed filtering can be an order of magni- tude or more, depending on the size of the file. The funindex program creates an index on one or more columns in a binary table. For example, to create an index for the column pi in the file huge.fits, use: funindex huge.fits pi This will create an index named huge_pi.idx. When a filter expression is initialized for row evaluation, funtools looks for an index file for each column in the filter expression. If found, and if the file modification date of the index file is later than that of the data file, then the index will be used to reduce the number of rows that are evaluated in the filter. When Spatial Region Filtering is part of the expression, the columns associated with the region are checked for index files. If an index file is not available for a given column, then in general, all rows must be checked when that column is part of a filter expression. This is not true, however, when a non-indexed column is part of an AND expression. In this case, only the rows that pass the other part of the AND expression need to be checked. Thus, in some cases, filtering speed can increase significantly even if all columns are not indexed. Also note that certain types of filter expression syntax cannot make use of indices. For example, calling functions with column names as arguments implies that all rows must be checked against the function value. Once again, however, if this function is part of an AND expres- sion, then a significant improvement in speed still is possible if the other part of the AND expression is indexed. For example, note below the dramatic speedup in searching a 1 Gb file using an AND filter, even when one of the columns (pha) has no index: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 42.36u 13.07s 6:42.89 13.7% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: [INDEF] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxand(1): INDEF [IDX_OR_SORT] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 1.55u 0.37s 1:19.80 2.4% When all columns are indexed, the increase in speed can be even more dramatic: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 42.60u 12.63s 7:28.63 12.3% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: pi start=9473025,stop=9492240 => pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxor sort/merge: pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] [IDX_OR_SORT] idxmerge(5): [IDX_OR_SORT] pi[ROW] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 1.67u 0.30s 0:24.76 7.9% The miracle of indexed filtering (and indeed, of any indexing) is the speed of the binary search on the index, which is of order log2(n) instead of n. (The funtools binary search method is taken from http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/03/22/Binary, to whom grateful acknowledgement is made.) This means that the larger the file, the better the performance. Conversely, it also means that for small files, using an index (and the overhead involved) can slow filtering down somewhat. Our tests indicate that on a file containing a few tens of thousands of rows, indexed filtering can be 10 to 20 percent slower than non-indexed filtering. Of course, your mileage will vary with con- ditions (disk access speed, amount of available memory, process load, etc.) Any problem encountered during index processing will result in indexing being turned off, and replaced by filtering all rows. You can turn filtering off manually by setting the idx_activate variable to 0 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_ACTIVATE environment variable to 0 (in the global environment). Debugging output showing how the indexes are being processed can be displayed to stderr by setting the idx_debug variable to 1 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_DEBUG environment variable to 1 (in the global environment). Currently, indexed filtering only works with FITS binary tables and raw event files. It does not work with text files. This restriction might be removed in a future release. SEE ALSO
See funtools(7) for a list of Funtools help pages version 1.4.2 January 2, 2008 funidx(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy