Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? Under Consideration: Migrate the Forums to Discourse Post 303044897 by stomp on Sunday 8th of March 2020 03:40:01 AM
Old 03-08-2020
Hi,

In the past i participated sometimes at Monitoring Portal . They changed to discourse 1-2 years ago. The usability seems fine for me. Since discourse is based on ruby on rails(RoR), the resource requirements are higher than the php based vbulletin. I had never run discourse on my own so far. I just had a quick look when searching for a forum solution, and discarded it, because it would have required a newer stronger machine. (Statement of a former programmer-colleague on ruby on rails: "i do not care about memory - developer time is far more costly.").

I had a glance at nodebb, which was very quick in terms of response times. I liked that very much. Home | XCP-ng forum is based on NodeBB. NodeBB is based on Node.js.

phpBB has gotten another major rewrite with version 3.3. I used it as an internal communication board(version 3.2). The administration felt very awful back then. then Since it's fully OSS maybe they constantly improve over time?

All three packages are fully open source.

regards
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

How to migrate ?

Currently, I am planning a migration between machine which under True64UNIX. The new machine will run with higher version O/S. My question is, is there any solution on migrating one machine to another which with different O/S version? My goal is keeping minimum impact to the users. Excuse my... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: coolmans
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Pipe not taken into consideration

I'm trying to see every file which my group (staff) has in a certain directory, recursively. The pipe ls -l -R | grep staff is not working exactly as I want, as for every directory to which my user does not have access, a line like: ls: ./directory/lost+found: The file access permissions do not... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: panchopp
5 Replies

3. Solaris

Migrate oracle solaris 5.8 5.9

If I have an oracle 9 database environment on a san running solaris 5.8 as the os. Can I plug the san into a Solaris 5.9 environment and have the database work ? - as long as binaries are on the san (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: tim-carroll@com
1 Replies

4. Solaris

Can you migrate UFS to ZFS ?

I have some UFS volumes (non root), that I would like to change into ZFS volumes. Is this possible ? I think the only method is to create a new zfs volume and copy the data accoss, this would take a long time for us. Is there a quicker way ? Regards (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: wjones
5 Replies

5. Solaris

Migrate from MPXIO to Powerpath

Here is the issue: I am building a database server using Solaris 10x86 U8. The system is jumpstarted with mpxio enabled and booting from the san. We need to have powerpath 5.3 installed and would like to have powerpath take control of the the boot san as well or have mpxio control the san... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: nabru72
2 Replies

6. Linux

Mysql Migrate

Hi , I would like to (MYSQL) migrate the all the data from solari's to linux box. I have checked whether mysql is installed or not. rpm -qa | grep -i mysql I confirmed !!!! I want to know the following points. 1) How can get to know what are mysql data files and location as well.... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mani_apr08
4 Replies

7. BSD

Migrate a Hard Disk

hi Has anyone already tried to migrate a hard disk with FreeBSD using recoverdisk? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ccc
1 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Migrate from FTP to SFTP

Hi,I am using following code for FTP in shell script file and it is working.Now I want to migrate from FTP to SFTP.What code changes/steps I have to perform for SFTP ? ftp -in <<FIN open $SAP_UP_SERVER user $SAP_UP_USER $SAP_UP_PASSWORD asc put... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nitin Varshneya
7 Replies
BUNDLE-UPDATE(1)														  BUNDLE-UPDATE(1)

NAME
bundle-update - Update your gems to the latest available versions SYNOPSIS
bundle update *gems [--source=NAME] DESCRIPTION
Update the gems specified (all gems, if none are specified), ignoring the previously installed gems specified in the Gemfile.lock. In gen- eral, you should use bundle install(1) bundle-install.1.html to install the same exact gems and versions across machines. You would use bundle update to explicitly update the version of a gem. OPTIONS
--source=<name> The name of a :git or :path source used in the Gemfile(5). For instance, with a :git source of http://github.com/rails/rails.git, you would call bundle update --source rails UPDATING ALL GEMS
If you run bundle update with no parameters, bundler will ignore any previously installed gems and resolve all dependencies again based on the latest versions of all gems available in the sources. Consider the following Gemfile(5): source "https://rubygems.org" gem "rails", "3.0.0.rc" gem "nokogiri" When you run bundle install(1) bundle-install.1.html the first time, bundler will resolve all of the dependencies, all the way down, and install what you need: Fetching source index for https://rubygems.org/ Installing rake (10.0.2) Installing abstract (1.0.0) Installing activesupport (3.0.0.rc) Installing builder (2.1.2) Installing i18n (0.4.1) Installing activemodel (3.0.0.rc) Installing erubis (2.6.6) Installing rack (1.2.1) Installing rack-mount (0.6.9) Installing rack-test (0.5.4) Installing tzinfo (0.3.22) Installing actionpack (3.0.0.rc) Installing mime-types (1.16) Installing polyglot (0.3.1) Installing treetop (1.4.8) Installing mail (2.2.5) Installing actionmailer (3.0.0.rc) Installing arel (0.4.0) Installing activerecord (3.0.0.rc) Installing activeresource (3.0.0.rc) Installing bundler (1.0.0.rc.3) Installing nokogiri (1.4.3.1) with native extensions Installing thor (0.14.0) Installing railties (3.0.0.rc) Installing rails (3.0.0.rc) Your bundle is complete! Use `bundle show [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is installed. As you can see, even though you have just two gems in the Gemfile(5), your application actually needs 25 different gems in order to run. Bundler remembers the exact versions it installed in Gemfile.lock. The next time you run bundle install(1) bundle-install.1.html, bundler skips the dependency resolution and installs the same gems as it installed last time. After checking in the Gemfile.lock into version control and cloning it on another machine, running bundle install(1) bundle-install.1.html will still install the gems that you installed last time. You don't need to worry that a new release of erubis or mail changes the gems you use. However, from time to time, you might want to update the gems you are using to the newest versions that still match the gems in your Gem- file(5). To do this, run bundle update, which will ignore the Gemfile.lock, and resolve all the dependencies again. Keep in mind that this process can result in a significantly different set of the 25 gems, based on the requirements of new gems that the gem authors released since the last time you ran bundle update. UPDATING A LIST OF GEMS
Sometimes, you want to update a single gem in the Gemfile(5), and leave the rest of the gems that you specified locked to the versions in the Gemfile.lock. For instance, in the scenario above, imagine that nokogiri releases version 1.4.4, and you want to update it without updating Rails and all of its dependencies. To do this, run bundle update nokogiri. Bundler will update nokogiri and any of its dependencies, but leave alone Rails and its dependencies. OVERLAPPING DEPENDENCIES
Sometimes, multiple gems declared in your Gemfile(5) are satisfied by the same second-level dependency. For instance, consider the case of thin and rack-perftools-profiler. source "https://rubygems.org" gem "thin" gem "rack-perftools-profiler" The thin gem depends on rack >= 1.0, while rack-perftools-profiler depends on rack ~> 1.0. If you run bundle install, you get: Fetching source index for https://rubygems.org/ Installing daemons (1.1.0) Installing eventmachine (0.12.10) with native extensions Installing open4 (1.0.1) Installing perftools.rb (0.4.7) with native extensions Installing rack (1.2.1) Installing rack-perftools_profiler (0.0.2) Installing thin (1.2.7) with native extensions Using bundler (1.0.0.rc.3) In this case, the two gems have their own set of dependencies, but they share rack in common. If you run bundle update thin, bundler will update daemons, eventmachine and rack, which are dependencies of thin, but not open4 or perftools.rb, which are dependencies of rack-perftools_profiler. Note that bundle update thin will update rack even though it's also a dependency of rack-perftools_profiler. In short, when you update a gem using bundle update, bundler will update all dependencies of that gem, including those that are also depen- dencies of another gem. In this scenario, updating the thin version manually in the Gemfile(5), and then running bundle install(1) bundle-install.1.html will only update daemons and eventmachine, but not rack. For more information, see the CONSERVATIVE UPDATING section of bundle install(1) bun- dle-install.1.html. RECOMMENDED WORKFLOW
In general, when working with an application managed with bundler, you should use the following workflow: o After you create your Gemfile(5) for the first time, run $ bundle install o Check the resulting Gemfile.lock into version control $ git add Gemfile.lock o When checking out this repository on another development machine, run $ bundle install o When checking out this repository on a deployment machine, run $ bundle install --deployment o After changing the Gemfile(5) to reflect a new or update dependency, run $ bundle install o Make sure to check the updated Gemfile.lock into version control $ git add Gemfile.lock o If bundle install(1) bundle-install.1.html reports a conflict, manually update the specific gems that you changed in the Gemfile(5) $ bundle update rails thin o If you want to update all the gems to the latest possible versions that still match the gems listed in the Gemfile(5), run $ bundle update March 2013 BUNDLE-UPDATE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy