02-29-2020
After thinking about this some more, let me please add....
I have nothing against anyone using btrfs and someday, when it is default on Ubuntu, I will probably follow the crowd and use btrfs; but as long as ext4 is the Ubuntu default, I will stick with ext4.
However, for anyone who wants to get into btrfs, one approach is to start with btrfs on a non-root partition (as Peasant suggested, as I recall). Maybe you can stress-test btrfs in that way by crashing your system, unplugging the power cord, etc and see if you are happy with how btrfs recovers. When you are comfortable, then maybe try a root partition with btrfs with proper backups on your desktop machine.
After all, the OP was talking about his desktop machine, not some remote linux server on the other side of the planet where you want a very safe filesystem like ext4.
Some people (unlike me) prefer to be early adopters of these kinds of technologies and if you really want to use btrfs, then go for it. I am not really an "early adopter" of any technology which I don't really have an operational need for, so I am waiting for tech like btrfs to be the OOTB default with Ubuntu. That is the signal I am looking for.
Where Ubuntu goes (default and mainstream), I will follow, generally speaking.
However, I was not always like this with Linux and in the early days (over 20 years ago), I was keen to be a very early adopter. However, over the years, I am less of an "early adopter" and more of a "late adopter" of new tech like btrfs. This is only me.
I encourage others to march to the beat of your own music, not the beat of my music. I only offer my opinion about what I do and do not do. This is only my opinion and in no way is presented as "the truth" or "the way to go".
btrfs has a lot of great features. If btrfs fits into your current plans, then go for it as you deem appropriate. Just because "Neo" is stuck on ext4 until Ubuntu makes btrfs the Ubuntu default, there is no reason not to use btrfs if the spirit moves you, especially on your desktop machine (not a server in a data center far, far away....).
These 2 Users Gave Thanks to Neo For This Post:
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
We are looking into buying a new software, billing software that is, and want to know if you can run that on the same UNIX server as another major software?
Is there a limit to the different types of software Unix can run, or is it like windows where you can install as many as you like?
... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hoz
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi there.
I've been tasked with making a new design for our Unix systems :eek:
Now the question I have is;
How many LPARs can a p570 hold WITHOUT using a VIO Server.
Many Thanks
Kees (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: KeesH
1 Replies
3. Red Hat
Hi.
I downloaded a package that could only be installed on RHEL5, and not 4 or 3, so I got the source in order to compile it on RHEL 3 so hopefully it will work on all versions.
So I have the source for a working package, but when I build it in RHEL 3 and then try to install it in RHEL 5, it... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Boaz
6 Replies
4. Filesystems, Disks and Memory
I'm looking for a means to ensure that servers in the two or three datacenters, connected in a ring via IP through two ISPs, can distribute load and/or replicate data among at least two SAN-class disk devices.
I want to evaluate several solutions, and I'm open to solutions ranging from free,... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: otheus
6 Replies
5. Solaris
I've got a Solaris 11 Express installed on my machine. I have created a raidz2 zpool named shares and a simple one-disc zpool named backup. I have made a script that would send a daily snapshot of shares to backup.
I use these commands
zfs snapshot shares@DDMMRRRRHHMM
zfs send -i shares@....... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: RychnD
10 Replies
6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
I wonder if anyone could assist with some problems I'm having with Linux Capabilities and their use when using the commands "nice" and "schedtool".
I run a couple of PCs, one is an elderly AMD Sempron 2800+ (32-bit, 2GHz clock and 3GB memory) that is used as a family multimedia system running... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: MikeGM
3 Replies
7. Linux
So I'm having a problem getting a Broadcom BCM4312 wireless controller to work under the broadcom-wl module
$uname
Linux 3.8.11-200.fc18.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 1 19:44:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lspci -v
05:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Skrynesaver
2 Replies
8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi
I'm trying to compile my linux kernel with CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y.
any idea what this thing does ??
Also another question , If I compile the kernel that I'm currently using , what'll happen ?
~cheers (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: leghorn
3 Replies
9. What is on Your Mind?
Hi All,
How worried is everyone about the Dirty Cow Linux exploit? Has anybody experienced attacks yet?
From the research I've done it seems that the exploit is "reliable" (that is it works nearly every time on vulverable systems) which is not good news.
We all believe that Unix/Linux... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: hicksd8
3 Replies