Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers Should I use a CoW filesystem on my PC if I only wanted snapshot capabilities ? Post 303044632 by Neo on Friday 28th of February 2020 09:22:40 AM
Old 02-28-2020
No.

I do not recommend those file systems.

Your are better off running ext4, a RAID configuration (I run RAID1, but do not depend on it), and doing regular backups on your data based on your risk management model (this is the most critical).

Nothing beats a strong filesystem and a very well thought out backup and recovery plan.

That is my view. YMMV

On the desktop, I run macOS and have a similar strategy. I make full backups often, based on the activity on the system. The more activity and files (and the nature of the files) created, the more frequent the backups.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Unix Capabilities?

We are looking into buying a new software, billing software that is, and want to know if you can run that on the same UNIX server as another major software? Is there a limit to the different types of software Unix can run, or is it like windows where you can install as many as you like? ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hoz
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

p570 Capabilities

Hi there. I've been tasked with making a new design for our Unix systems :eek: Now the question I have is; How many LPARs can a p570 hold WITHOUT using a VIO Server. Many Thanks Kees (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: KeesH
1 Replies

3. Red Hat

Adding capabilities to an RPM

Hi. I downloaded a package that could only be installed on RHEL5, and not 4 or 3, so I got the source in order to compile it on RHEL 3 so hopefully it will work on all versions. So I have the source for a working package, but when I build it in RHEL 3 and then try to install it in RHEL 5, it... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Boaz
6 Replies

4. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Wanted: Geographically distributed filesystem solution

I'm looking for a means to ensure that servers in the two or three datacenters, connected in a ring via IP through two ISPs, can distribute load and/or replicate data among at least two SAN-class disk devices. I want to evaluate several solutions, and I'm open to solutions ranging from free,... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: otheus
6 Replies

5. Solaris

Cannot use filesystem while sending a snapshot

I've got a Solaris 11 Express installed on my machine. I have created a raidz2 zpool named shares and a simple one-disc zpool named backup. I have made a script that would send a daily snapshot of shares to backup. I use these commands zfs snapshot shares@DDMMRRRRHHMM zfs send -i shares@....... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: RychnD
10 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Use of Capabilities

I wonder if anyone could assist with some problems I'm having with Linux Capabilities and their use when using the commands "nice" and "schedtool". I run a couple of PCs, one is an elderly AMD Sempron 2800+ (32-bit, 2GHz clock and 3GB memory) that is used as a family multimedia system running... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: MikeGM
3 Replies

7. Linux

Broadcom under Fedora 18 (Spherical Cow)

So I'm having a problem getting a Broadcom BCM4312 wireless controller to work under the broadcom-wl module $uname Linux 3.8.11-200.fc18.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 1 19:44:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -v 05:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Skrynesaver
2 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Linux capabilities discussion

Hi I'm trying to compile my linux kernel with CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y. any idea what this thing does ?? Also another question , If I compile the kernel that I'm currently using , what'll happen ? ~cheers (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: leghorn
3 Replies

9. What is on Your Mind?

Anybody want to talk about Dirty Cow?

Hi All, How worried is everyone about the Dirty Cow Linux exploit? Has anybody experienced attacks yet? From the research I've done it seems that the exploit is "reliable" (that is it works nearly every time on vulverable systems) which is not good news. We all believe that Unix/Linux... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: hicksd8
3 Replies
RDUP-BACKUPS(7) 						       rdup							   RDUP-BACKUPS(7)

NAME
rdup-backups - introduction into making backups with rdup INTRODUCTION
rdup is a simple program that prints out a list of files and directories that are changed changed on a filesystem. It is more sophisticated than for instance find, because rdup will find files that are removed or directories that are renamed. A long time ago rdup included a bunch of shell and Perl scripts that implemented a backup policy. These could be used in a pipeline to per- form a backup. Currently rdup consists out of three basic utilities: rdup With rdup you create the file list on which later programs in the pipeline can work. The default output format also includes the files' content. rdup can be seen as a tar replacement in this respect, but rdup also allows for all kinds of transformations of the content (encryption, compression, reversal), see the -P switch in rdup(1) for more information. rdup-tr With rdup-tr you can transform the files rdup delivers to you. You can create tar, cpio or pax files. You can encrypt pathnames. rdup-tr is filter that reads from standard input and writes to standard output. See rdup-tr(1) for more information. With rdup and rdup-tr you can create an encrypted archive which is put in a directory structure that is also encrypted. rdup-up With rdup-up you can update an existing directory structure with the updates as described by rdup. rdup-up reads rdup input and will create the files, symbolic links, hard links and directories (and sockets, pipes and devices) in the file system. See rdup-up(1) for more information. So the general backup pipeline for rdup will look something like this: create filelist | transform | update filesystem ( rdup | rdup-tr | rdup-up ) Note 1: The same sequence is used for restoring. In both cases you want to move files from location A to B. The only difference is that the transformation is reversed when you restore. Note 2: The use of rdup-tr is optional. BACKUPS AND RESTORES
For rdup there is no difference between backups and restores. If you think about this for a minute you understand why. Making a backup means copying a list of files somewhere else. Restoring files is copying a list of files back to the place they came from. Same difference. So rdup can be used for both, if you did any transformation with rdup during the backup you just need to reverse those operations during the restore. BACKUPS
It is always best to backup to another medium, be it a different local harddisk or a NFS/CIFS mounted filesystem. You can also use ssh to store file on a remote server, ala rsync (although not as network efficient). If you backup to a local disk you can just as well use rsync or plain old tar, but if you store your files at somebody else's disk you will need encryption. This is where you go beyond rsync and rdup comes in. Rsync cannot do per-file encryption, sure you can encrypt the network traffic with ssh, but at the remote side your files are kept in plain view. If you implement remote backups, the easy route is to allow root access on the backup medium. If the backup runs without root access the created files will not have their original ownership. For NFS this can be achieved by using no_root_squash, for ssh you could enable PermitRootLogin. Note that this may be a security risk. SNAPSHOT BACKUPS
We need a little help here in the form of the rdup-simple script. Keep in mind that the following scripts can also be run remotely with the help of ssh. The following script implements the algorithm of rdup-simple. #!/bin/bash # some tmp files are saved in ~/.rdup. This directory must exist DIR=/home # what to backup BACKUP=/vol/backup TODAY=$(date +%Y%m/%d) LIST=~/.rdup/list-$HOSTNAME STAMP=~/.rdup/timestamp-$HOSTNAME # for remote backup, this has to run on the remote host! BUGBUG RET=$? case $RET in 2|*) echo Error >&2 exit 1 ;; 1) # full dump, remove file-list and time-stamp file rm $LIST $STAMP ;; 0) # inc dump # do nothing here ;; esac # this is the place where you want to modify the command line # right now, nothing is translated we just use 'cat' rdup -N $STAMP -Pcat $LIST $DIR | rdup-up $BACKUP/$HOSTNAME/$TODAY # or do a remote backup #rdup -N $STAMP -Pcat $LIST $DIR | ssh root@remotehost # rdup-up $BACKUP/$HOSTNAME/$TODAY LOCAL BACKUPS
With rdup-simple you can easily create backups. Backing up my home directory to a backup directory: rdup-simple ~ /vol/backup/$HOSTNAME This will create a backup in /vol/backup/$HOSTNAME/200705/15. So each day will have its own directory. Multiple sources are allowed, so: rdup-simple ~ /etc/ /var/lib /vol/backup/$HOSTNAME Will backup your home directory, /etc and /var/lib to the backup location. Also if you need to compress your backup, simple add a '-z' switch: rdup-simple -z ~ /etc/ /var/lib /vol/backup/$HOSTNAME REMOTE BACKUPS
For a remote backup to work, both the sending machine and the receiving machine must have rdup installed. The currently implemented proto- col is ssh. Dumping my homedir to the remote server: rdup-simple ~ ssh://miekg@remote/vol/backup/$HOSTNAME The syntax is almost identical, only the destination starts with the magic string 'ssh://'. Compression and encryption are just as easily enabled as with a local backup, just add '-z' and/or a '-k keyfile' argument: rdup-simple -z -k 'secret-file' ~ ssh://miekg@remote/vol/backup/$HOSTNAME Remember though, that because of these advanced features (compression, encryption, etc, ...) the network transfer can never be as efficient as rsync. ALSO SEE
rdup(1), rdup-tr(1), rdup-up(1) and http://www.miek.nl/projects/rdup/ 1.1.x 15 Dec 2008 RDUP-BACKUPS(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy