Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers Need advise/tip if there is more efficient way of doing this cut/paste/awk after changing a field Post 303044486 by newbie_01 on Monday 24th of February 2020 07:05:09 AM
Old 02-24-2020
Need advise/tip if there is more efficient way of doing this cut/paste/awk after changing a field

Hi,

This is the script currently and it is working as required. Just thought maybe there is a better or easier way of doing what I am trying to do.

Code:
$ cat x.ksh
#!/bin/ksh
#

cut -d"|" -f1 x.txt > x1.txt
cut -d"|" -f2 x.txt | awk -F"=" '{ print "USER="tolower($2) }' > x2.txt
cut -d"|" -f3- x.txt > x3.txt

paste -d "|" x1.txt x2.txt x3.txt | sort | uniq > x4.txt

cat x.txt
echo
cat x4.txt
echo

Below is an excerpt of the file that I want to change. This is x.txt, the original file that I want to run this on is about 1000+ lines. Basically, these files are from several log files merged into one and I am wanting to change the USER=<username> field so that <username> is in lower case. I am working on the assumption that USERNAME=<username> is always field2.


Code:
PROGRAM=JDBC Thin Client|USER=MICKEY|HOST=11.123.12.123|testmachine.xyz.com.zz
PROGRAM=JDBC Thin Client|USER=mickey|HOST=11.123.12.123|testmachine.xyz.com.zz

Sample run of the script below:


Code:
$ ./x.ksh
PROGRAM=JDBC Thin Client|USER=MICKEY|HOST=11.123.12.123|testmachine.xyz.com.zz
PROGRAM=JDBC Thin Client|USER=mickey|HOST=11.123.12.123|testmachine.xyz.com.zz

PROGRAM=JDBC Thin Client|USER=mickey|HOST=11.123.12.123|testmachine.xyz.com.zz

I could simply do
Code:
sort x.txt | tr [:upper:] [:lower:] | uniq

but for 'clarity' I prefer to only change USER=<username> to USER=<lowercase_username> and leave the rest of the line as it is. I can't work out the awk or sed command options to use to achieve what I wanted, hence I ended up with a shell script instead. Maybe there is an awk one-liner that can do what I am trying to achieve Smilie

Please advise. Thanks in advance.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

cut and paste columns using awk

Hi, Let's say that I have a file called table, I know that if I need to see a the second column for exampls I use: awk ' {print $2}' table.txt Is there anyway to use awk to actually cut a column and put it somewhere else in the table?:confused: (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: cosmologist
8 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

cut and paste using awk

Hi i need a favour i have a file which has some trillions of records. The file is like this 11111000000000192831840914000000000000000000000000000 45789899090000000000000000011111111111111111111111111 I want to cut specific postions in each line like cut1-3 and assisgn it to a variable and... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: richa2.m
5 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

cut and paste?

hi, I have a file with content like this for an employee: EmployeeID 101 Day_type, day vacation,1/2/2009 sick day, 3/2/2009 personal day, 4/5/2009 jury duty day, 5/5/2009 how do I make the result to show: EmployeeID,Day_type,day 101,vacation,1/2/2009 101,sick day,... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: jbchen
6 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Printing Field with Delimiter in AWK/cut

Hello, I had posted earlier about printing fields using AWK, but now I have a slightly different problem. I have text files in the format: 1*2,3,4,5 and wish to print the first, third, and fifth fields, including the asterisk and commas. In other words, after filtering it should look... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Jahn
1 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

cut and paste

Hi, Need a help with shell script. I have to search for a string in one of the file, if match found, copy the line to a new file and delete the line from the exisiting file. eg: 83510000000000063800000.1800000.1600000.1600000.2400000.1800000.2000000.21... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: gpaulose
6 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk,cut fields by change field format

Hi Everyone, # cat 1.txt 1321631,77770132976455,19,20091001011859,20091001011907 1321631,77770132976455,19,20091001011859,20091001011907 1321631,77770132976455,19,20091001011859,20091001011907 # cat 1.txt | awk -F, '{OFS=",";print $1,$3,$4,$5}' 1321631,19,20091001011859,20091001011907... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: jimmy_y
7 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Using a combination of sort/cut/grep/awk/join/paste/sed

I have a file and need to only select users that have a shell of “/bin/bash” in the line using awk or sed please help (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: boyboy1212
4 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Which cut command is more efficient?

Hi, I've got a query regarding which of the following is more efficient & why - cat <filename>|cut -d'*' -f2- > <newfilename> or cut -d'*' -f2- <filename> > <newfilename> Thanks. (17 Replies)
Discussion started by: sumoka
17 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

need help with cut and paste command

I have a file which contains 3 fields separated by tabs example andrew kid baker I need to swap kid and baker using cut and paste commands how is this to be done? Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: drew211
3 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

how to cut the last field without using awk

i have file as with the below content aaa.bbb.cc.dd aaa.fff.bb yyyyy.rrrrr.ggggg.iii wwww.w.r.ty i want the o/p as below dd bb iii ty but i dont want to use awk. is there any other way to do this ? (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: anandgodse
5 Replies
Fields(3pm)						User Contributed Perl Documentation					       Fields(3pm)

NAME
Sort::Fields - Sort lines containing delimited fields SYNOPSIS
use Sort::Fields; @sorted = fieldsort [3, '2n'], @lines; @sorted = fieldsort '+', [-1, -3, 0], @lines; $sort_3_2n = make_fieldsort [3, '2n'], @lines; @sorted = $sort_3_2n->(@lines); DESCRIPTION
Sort::Fields provides a general purpose technique for efficiently sorting lists of lines that contain data separated into fields. Sort::Fields automatically imports two subroutines, "fieldsort" and "make_fieldsort", and two variants, "stable_fieldsort" and "make_sta- ble_fieldsort". "make_fieldsort" generates a sorting subroutine and returns a reference to it. "fieldsort" is a wrapper for the "make_fieldsort" subroutine. The first argument to make_fieldsort is a delimiter string, which is used as a regular expression argument for a "split" operator. The delimiter string is optional. If it is not supplied, make_fieldsort splits each line using "/s+/". The second argument is an array reference containing one or more field specifiers. The specifiers indicate what fields in the strings will be used to sort the data. The specifier "1" indicates the first field, "2" indicates the second, and so on. A negative specifier like "-2" means to sort on the second field in reverse (descending) order. To indicate a numeric rather than alphabetic comparison, append "n" to the specifier. A specifier of "0" means the entire string ("-0" means the entire string, in reverse order). The order in which the specifiers appear is the order in which they will be used to sort the data. The primary key is first, the secondary key is second, and so on. "fieldsort [1, 2], @data" is roughly equivalent to "make_fieldsort([1, 2])->(@data)". Avoid calling fieldsort repeatedly with the same sort specifiers. If you need to use a particular sort more than once, it is more efficient to call "make_fieldsort" once and reuse the subroutine it returns. "stable_fieldsort" and "make_stable_fieldsort" are like their "unstable" counterparts, except that the items that compare the same are maintained in their original order. EXAMPLES
Some sample data (in array @data): 123 asd 1.22 asdd 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 43 rewq 2.12 ewet 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 23 erww 4.21 ewet 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet 123 refs 3.22 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd # alpha sort on column 1 print fieldsort [1], @data; 123 asd 1.22 asdd 123 refs 3.22 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd 23 erww 4.21 ewet 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 43 rewq 2.12 ewet 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet # numeric sort on column 1 print fieldsort ['1n'], @data; 23 erww 4.21 ewet 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 43 rewq 2.12 ewet 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet 123 asd 1.22 asdd 123 refs 3.22 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd # reverse numeric sort on column 1 print fieldsort ['-1n'], @data; 123 asd 1.22 asdd 123 refs 3.22 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 43 rewq 2.12 ewet 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 23 erww 4.21 ewet # alpha sort on column 2, then alpha on entire line print fieldsort [2, 0], @data; 123 asd 1.22 asdd 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 23 erww 4.21 ewet 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet 123 refs 3.22 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd 43 rewq 2.12 ewet # alpha sort on column 4, then numeric on column 1, then reverse # numeric on column 3 print fieldsort [4, '1n', '-3n'], @data; 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd 123 refs 3.22 asdd 123 asd 1.22 asdd 23 erww 4.21 ewet 43 rewq 2.12 ewet 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet # now, splitting on either literal period or whitespace # sort numeric on column 4 (fractional part of decimals) then # numeric on column 3 (whole part of decimals) print fieldsort '(?:.|s+)', ['4n', '3n'], @data; 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 43 rewq 2.12 ewet 23 erww 4.21 ewet 123 asd 1.22 asdd 123 refs 3.22 asdd 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet # alpha sort on column 4, then numeric on the entire line # NOTE: produces warnings under -w print fieldsort [4, '0n'], @data; 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 123 asd 1.22 asdd 123 refs 3.22 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd 23 erww 4.21 ewet 43 rewq 2.12 ewet 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet # stable alpha sort on column 4 (maintains original relative order # among items that compare the same) print stable_fieldsort [4], @data; 123 asd 1.22 asdd 32 ewq 2.32 asdd 123 refs 3.22 asdd 123 refs 4.32 asdd 43 rewq 2.12 ewet 51 erwt 34.2 ewet 23 erww 4.21 ewet 91 fdgs 3.43 ewet BUGS
Some rudimentary tests now. Perhaps something should be done to catch things like: fieldsort '.', [1, 2], @lines; '.' translates to "split /./" -- probably not what you want. Passing blank lines and/or lines containing the wrong kind of data (alphas instead of numbers) can result in copious warning messages under "-w". If the regexp contains memory parentheses ("(...)" rather than "(?:...)"), split will function in "delimiter retention" mode, capturing the contents of the parentheses as well as the stuff between the delimiters. I could imagine how this could be useful, but on the other hand I could also imagine how it could be confusing if encountered unexpectedly. Caveat sortor. Not really a bug, but if you are planning to sort a large text file, consider using sort(1). Unless, of course, your operating system doesn't have sort(1). AUTHOR
Joseph N. Hall, joseph@5sigma.com SEE ALSO
perl(1). perl v5.8.8 2008-03-25 Fields(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy