Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Why is editing a file by renaming the new one safer? Post 303042600 by Neo on Wednesday 1st of January 2020 03:17:37 AM
Old 01-01-2020
I agree.

For many non-critical files, where I am making small, incremental changes, I often do not make a fresh backup copy, especially because I have off-platform backups as well; and edit the file directory and save it, as normal.

Like zxmaus, I cannot recall every losing a file due to a system crash while editing a file, in over 40 decades of working with computers.

However, I do recall making a lot of "simple human mistakes" and have learned to be "saved by backups". This leads me to always recommend people make and maintain filesystem backups, based on their risk management model (criticality, vulnerability, threats).

These days, more-often-than-not, for a increasing majority of my file edits, if they are significant, I will sftp the file to my desktop, open the file in Visual Studio Code (or cut-and-paste into VSC if a small file) , edit the file using all the available syntax and formatting tools and plugins, and save the edited file with a different name, preserving the original file on my working directory on my desktop, and then I will either sftp or cut-and-past into the remote server over an ssh terminal.

I cannot count the number of times VSC has been helpful to spot a syntax error which missed my tired, overworked eyes. The formatting is also useful (indentations, consistent formatting, etc) is also very useful in VSC. These kinds of tools are really time savers, especially for syntax checking.

It goes without saying, I use vi every day to edit files; but I also use vi in conjunction with VSC, more and more; for the syntax checking and formatting for code (programming languages) and JSON files, etc. But as I am quick to confess I do edit files with vi and do not make make a backup copy, but not often; but if it is some small change which i can easily revert-back based on "memory", then I am guilty. I also push files to private GIT repositories as well, when my work on critical files are done. GIT is Good for backups Smilie
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Editing the end of the file without loading the entire file

hi! I am a newbee. I would really appreciate if you can answer the following question: I have a huge data file, 214MB with several coloumns. I need to delete the very last line of the file. Everything I know takes a lot of time to do it ( because I have to open the file in an editor or run a... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Garuda
3 Replies

2. What is on Your Mind?

Nuclear Elephant iPhone Wipe making your iPhone Safer for Resale

For those with the iPhones here might read up how to wipe your personal data off the phone before reselling or trade-in. ;) source: Nuclear Elephant: iPhone Wipe June 1, 2008: Making your iPhone Safe for Resale Since my posts regarding the iPhone restore mode being insufficient for wiping... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: sparcguy
0 Replies

3. What is on Your Mind?

Is M$ safer than UN*X(-LIKE)??

I know that you already know the answer to the question. It just springed in my mind after what happened yesterday. I was getting some books off of Amazon.com, since they are cheeper than bookstore, and my mother said something that made me laugh 'till I couldn't breathe. I have a Debian Lenny... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: Texasone
12 Replies

4. Solaris

metaset - renaming /editing the set name - possible ?

Hi all I need to change my current metaset setname from lh-rms02ds to lh-lgwrms01ds. Is it possible ?? I know within veritas I do a vxedit, is there a way in SVM ? I notice theres a metarename, but this is for the metadevice level. Any tips ? help ?? Or do I need to delete /... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sbk1972
2 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help with file editing while keeping file format intact

Hi, I am having a file which is fix length and comma seperated. And I want to replace values for one column. I am reading file line by line in variable $LINE and then replacing the string. Problem is after changing value and writing new file temp5.txt, formating of original file is getting... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mruda
8 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

editing line in text file adding number to value in file

I have a text file that has data like: Data "12345#22" Fred ID 12345 Age 45 Wilma Dino Data "123#22" Tarzan ID 123 Age 33 Jane I need to figure out a way of adding 1,000,000 to the specific lines (always same format) in the file, so it becomes: Data "1012345#22" Fred ID... (16 Replies)
Discussion started by: say170
16 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Need help in editing a file

I have a file which has 10 million records in it. When am trying to edit the file with vi, the following error occurs: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "file1" Value too large for defined data type Is there any way that I can edit this file without using vi? Any help would be really appreciated.... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: bobby1015
8 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

# /UNIX.org file deleting is safer or not

Hi All, Please tell me the use of # /Unix.org file it has reserved a huge disk space, I want to know is it safer to truncate or delete. Thanks - Rukshan.:) (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rukshan4u2c
1 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Convert vi editing to text editing

Dear Guru's I'm using Putty and want to edit a file. I know we generally use vi editor to do it. As I'm not good in using vi editor, I want to convert the vi into something like text pad. Is there any option in Putty to do the same ? Thanks for your response. Srini (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: thummi9090
6 Replies
RDUP-BACKUPS(7) 						       rdup							   RDUP-BACKUPS(7)

NAME
rdup-backups - introduction into making backups with rdup INTRODUCTION
rdup is a simple program that prints out a list of files and directories that are changed changed on a filesystem. It is more sophisticated than for instance find, because rdup will find files that are removed or directories that are renamed. A long time ago rdup included a bunch of shell and Perl scripts that implemented a backup policy. These could be used in a pipeline to per- form a backup. Currently rdup consists out of three basic utilities: rdup With rdup you create the file list on which later programs in the pipeline can work. The default output format also includes the files' content. rdup can be seen as a tar replacement in this respect, but rdup also allows for all kinds of transformations of the content (encryption, compression, reversal), see the -P switch in rdup(1) for more information. rdup-tr With rdup-tr you can transform the files rdup delivers to you. You can create tar, cpio or pax files. You can encrypt pathnames. rdup-tr is filter that reads from standard input and writes to standard output. See rdup-tr(1) for more information. With rdup and rdup-tr you can create an encrypted archive which is put in a directory structure that is also encrypted. rdup-up With rdup-up you can update an existing directory structure with the updates as described by rdup. rdup-up reads rdup input and will create the files, symbolic links, hard links and directories (and sockets, pipes and devices) in the file system. See rdup-up(1) for more information. So the general backup pipeline for rdup will look something like this: create filelist | transform | update filesystem ( rdup | rdup-tr | rdup-up ) Note 1: The same sequence is used for restoring. In both cases you want to move files from location A to B. The only difference is that the transformation is reversed when you restore. Note 2: The use of rdup-tr is optional. BACKUPS AND RESTORES
For rdup there is no difference between backups and restores. If you think about this for a minute you understand why. Making a backup means copying a list of files somewhere else. Restoring files is copying a list of files back to the place they came from. Same difference. So rdup can be used for both, if you did any transformation with rdup during the backup you just need to reverse those operations during the restore. BACKUPS
It is always best to backup to another medium, be it a different local harddisk or a NFS/CIFS mounted filesystem. You can also use ssh to store file on a remote server, ala rsync (although not as network efficient). If you backup to a local disk you can just as well use rsync or plain old tar, but if you store your files at somebody else's disk you will need encryption. This is where you go beyond rsync and rdup comes in. Rsync cannot do per-file encryption, sure you can encrypt the network traffic with ssh, but at the remote side your files are kept in plain view. If you implement remote backups, the easy route is to allow root access on the backup medium. If the backup runs without root access the created files will not have their original ownership. For NFS this can be achieved by using no_root_squash, for ssh you could enable PermitRootLogin. Note that this may be a security risk. SNAPSHOT BACKUPS
We need a little help here in the form of the rdup-simple script. Keep in mind that the following scripts can also be run remotely with the help of ssh. The following script implements the algorithm of rdup-simple. #!/bin/bash # some tmp files are saved in ~/.rdup. This directory must exist DIR=/home # what to backup BACKUP=/vol/backup TODAY=$(date +%Y%m/%d) LIST=~/.rdup/list-$HOSTNAME STAMP=~/.rdup/timestamp-$HOSTNAME # for remote backup, this has to run on the remote host! BUGBUG RET=$? case $RET in 2|*) echo Error >&2 exit 1 ;; 1) # full dump, remove file-list and time-stamp file rm $LIST $STAMP ;; 0) # inc dump # do nothing here ;; esac # this is the place where you want to modify the command line # right now, nothing is translated we just use 'cat' rdup -N $STAMP -Pcat $LIST $DIR | rdup-up $BACKUP/$HOSTNAME/$TODAY # or do a remote backup #rdup -N $STAMP -Pcat $LIST $DIR | ssh root@remotehost # rdup-up $BACKUP/$HOSTNAME/$TODAY LOCAL BACKUPS
With rdup-simple you can easily create backups. Backing up my home directory to a backup directory: rdup-simple ~ /vol/backup/$HOSTNAME This will create a backup in /vol/backup/$HOSTNAME/200705/15. So each day will have its own directory. Multiple sources are allowed, so: rdup-simple ~ /etc/ /var/lib /vol/backup/$HOSTNAME Will backup your home directory, /etc and /var/lib to the backup location. Also if you need to compress your backup, simple add a '-z' switch: rdup-simple -z ~ /etc/ /var/lib /vol/backup/$HOSTNAME REMOTE BACKUPS
For a remote backup to work, both the sending machine and the receiving machine must have rdup installed. The currently implemented proto- col is ssh. Dumping my homedir to the remote server: rdup-simple ~ ssh://miekg@remote/vol/backup/$HOSTNAME The syntax is almost identical, only the destination starts with the magic string 'ssh://'. Compression and encryption are just as easily enabled as with a local backup, just add '-z' and/or a '-k keyfile' argument: rdup-simple -z -k 'secret-file' ~ ssh://miekg@remote/vol/backup/$HOSTNAME Remember though, that because of these advanced features (compression, encryption, etc, ...) the network transfer can never be as efficient as rsync. ALSO SEE
rdup(1), rdup-tr(1), rdup-up(1) and http://www.miek.nl/projects/rdup/ 1.1.x 15 Dec 2008 RDUP-BACKUPS(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy