09-04-2019
My apologies for being away for a few days. There should be no difference with the process because they will both do the same thing. If the lost LUN is now available and visible to the volume group, then the sync, however it runs will have to read the appropriate physical partitions from the good side and copy them to the stale side if the PP has been updated. It will not copy the data if the PP has not updated, but for a large LV, this process can take some time to complete.
You should be able to monitor it from another session so you get an idea of progress and see the stale PP count reducing.
Robin
This User Gave Thanks to rbatte1 For This Post:
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Is there an easy way to find all stale mounts on a system? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: derf912
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I've created a partition with GNU Parted, how do I mount the partition?
The manual information at http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/manual/parted.html is good, but I am sure about how I mount the partition afterwards.
Thanks,
--Todd (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jtp51
1 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
hi, i was trying to mirror root volume group and the command i was using didnt respond for a long time
mirrorvg -m rootvg hdisk1
I was checking rootvg and it gives below. how do i fix stale partitions?? it seems to be on hdisk1
LV NAME TYPE LPs PPs PVs LV STATE ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: karthikosu
2 Replies
4. HP-UX
HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
I've got two users that show in "w" with long idle times but if I search for their processes I find nothing (ps -ef | grep username )
I'm not sure why "w" still sees them and if there is anything (short of a reboot) that I can do to clean them out.
Ideas? (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: LisaS
8 Replies
5. Solaris
hi all
while formatting hard disk i am getting following error.
Partition 1 ends at 266338338
It must be between 34 and 143374704.
label error: EFI Labels do not support overlapping partitions
Partition 8 overlaps partition 1.
Warning: error writing EFI.
Label failed.
I have formatted the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: nikhil kasar
2 Replies
6. AIX
Hellow friends,
We are having AIX 5.3 total memory allotted to /Backup directory is 700GB actual used memory is 250GB ..but when i issue df -gt command to check space it is showing /Backup directory is 70% full ..how to identify root cause.? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: umashankar1987
1 Replies
7. HP-UX
Hello,
I have an ancient HP-UX 11.11 system where I have a logical volume marked stale and I can't get it sync'd. I have tried lvsync and lvreduce/lvextend to no avail. It is just one 4Mb PE on the disk that I can't get current.
# lvdisplay -v /dev/vg00/lvol5 | grep stale
LV Status ... (17 Replies)
Discussion started by: port43
17 Replies
8. AIX
Hi friends,
the paging lv hd6 is in stale condition
hd6 paging 48 96 2 open/stale N/A
And i'am getting the following alerts in the server 333BD283 0811044814 U S LVDD Bad block detected with no relocation al
333BD283 0811041114 U S LVDD ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Mohamed Thamim
1 Replies
9. Red Hat
Hello All,
I have a Red Hat Linux 5.9 Server installed with one hard disk & 2 Partitions created on it as follows,
/boot - Linux Partition & another is
LVM - One VG & under that 5-6 Logical volumes(var,opt,home etc).
Here my requirement is to take out 1GB of space from LVM ( Any logical... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: gr8_usk
5 Replies
10. AIX
I have a AIX 7.1 system that has 3 failed disks, 1 in rootvg and 2 in vg_usr1.
Here is the output of lspv.
# lspv
hdisk0 00044d4dfbb11575 vg_usr1 active
hdisk1 0000150179158027 vg_usr1 active
hdisk2 ... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: c3rb3rus
11 Replies
setsid(2) System Calls Manual setsid(2)
NAME
setsid - create session and set process group ID
SYNOPSIS
DESCRIPTION
If the calling process is not a process group leader, creates a new session. The calling process becomes the session leader of this new
session, it becomes the process group leader of a new process group, and it has no controlling terminal. The process group ID of the call-
ing process is set equal to the process ID of the calling process. The calling process is the only process in the new process group and
the only process in the new session.
Security Restrictions
Some or all of the actions associated with this system call may require privileges. See privileges(5) for more information.
RETURN VALUE
Upon successful completion, returns the value of the new process group ID of the calling process. Otherwise, it returns a value of and
sets to indicate the error.
ERRORS
If fails, no changes occur and (see errno(2)) is set to one of the following values:
The calling process is already a process group leader, or
the process group ID of a process other than the calling process matches the process ID of the calling process.
The calling process does not have sufficient privileges.
AUTHOR
was developed by HP and AT&T.
SEE ALSO
exec(2), exit(2), fork(2), getpid(2), kill(2), setpgid(2), setpgrp(2), setpgrp3(2), signal(2), privileges(5), termio(7).
STANDARDS CONFORMANCE
setsid(2)