Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Private Messages.
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? Private Messages. Post 303029797 by Neo on Friday 1st of February 2019 01:16:46 AM
Old 02-01-2019
Quote:
Originally Posted by nezabudka
I apologize for offtopic.
It is sad to read this about the legend of FF. And until today I thought that this was only my personal problemma.
I used it for a long time until new releases broke compatibility with many plugins, including "vimperator".
Thanks to Neo for the detailed explanation, and yet very sad.
You are welcome.

For many people who are not web developers, it's hard to understand about browsers and browser compatibility and how browsers work with all the latest web-dev trends.

For me, it seems that FF is trying to carve a niche for themselves in the area of "user privacy" but they have taking it too far; breaking a lot of good applications, crippling modern Javascript apps, etc.

Firfox is simply "too extreme" and "breaks perfectly good Javascript functionality".... and since the users have no idea Firefox is breaking things, users have no idea why thing do not work. They comment to web sites things are not working, but if they would just try and user a great browser like Chrome or Safari, things would work better. For sure!!

I seriously advise diehard FF fans to keep using FF is they want to; but when viewing UNIX.COM use Chrome or Safari... both support all our Javascript features well, and we will be adding more, not less, modern JS features over time.

I simple do not have time to deal with the "extremism" of Firefox and their "we break the web and we do not care" attitude. It's no wonder FF keeps losing market share!


Download page for Chrome:

Google Chrome: The Most Secure Browser on the Web
This User Gave Thanks to Neo For This Post:
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. IP Networking

private network to private network gateway

i have one private network with one ip address, and i have a seperate network on a seperate ip address. now, each network is behind a firewall/router. now what i want to do is be able to access one server on the second network from a computer on the first., but with the private ip address, (this... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: norsk hedensk
2 Replies

2. Solaris

Private Lessons

Hi everyone, I'm looking to hire for private lessons a individual who is presently working as a unix system administrator or instructor in school who is teaching unix. I live in Clifton nj my nubmer is Cell **no phonenumbers on this forum** or email **no emails on this forum** please let me... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: john furman
1 Replies

3. IP Networking

Private network

Hi all, Currently we are in the progress of setting up a private network on all of our Sun Solaris servers. Purpose is to move all backup tasks to the private, hence reduce load on public network. Some of our servers only consists of 1 network card but with several ports. Shall we purchase... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: *Jess*
10 Replies

4. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators

Keeping old Private Messages

I am getting a warning that "Your PM box is 92% full." I have received (and kept) 46 messages; the upper limit is 50 messages. Is there a way to increase this limit, or to store the messages off-line in a way that would permit me to import them back to the site if I want to? 50 messages seems... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: era
6 Replies

5. OS X (Apple)

What's the difference between /etc and /private/etc?

Hello, whilst editing sudoers at 07:24 this morning via visudo I noticed that there are two files which get changed simultaneously as shown below. Then in fact what I noticed is that /private/etc contains exactly what /etc contains. Why is this? What is the difference between these two... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: michellepace
2 Replies

6. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

Private Network

Hello, I have a desktop which has two network cards installed on it and I connected these two card through a hub. On the desktop in have installed a Windows Vista Home Edition SO and a Windowx XP SO in a virtual way. I also had intalled a Virtual BOX software and Windows XP run through it. By... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: zendcool
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Private Key

I have two types of files pubring.pkr secring.skr secring.skr is encrypted and not able to read. How can i read secring.skr in text format after decrypting ? is there any way of decrypting this file? Unix HP - UX Version. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: airesh
4 Replies

8. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators

Private messages

Hi, As i am recieving private messages, i am unable to reply to them. Could you please enable my private messages. Thanks! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Amulya
2 Replies
TIME(2) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   TIME(2)

NAME
time - get time in seconds SYNOPSIS
#include <time.h> time_t time(time_t *t); DESCRIPTION
time() returns the time as the number of seconds since the Epoch, 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 (UTC). If t is non-NULL, the return value is also stored in the memory pointed to by t. RETURN VALUE
On success, the value of time in seconds since the Epoch is returned. On error, ((time_t) -1) is returned, and errno is set appropriately. ERRORS
EFAULT t points outside your accessible address space. CONFORMING TO
SVr4, 4.3BSD, C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001. POSIX does not specify any error conditions. NOTES
POSIX.1 defines seconds since the Epoch using a formula that approximates the number of seconds between a specified time and the Epoch. This formula takes account of the facts that all years that are evenly divisible by 4 are leap years, but years that are evenly divisible by 100 are not leap years unless they are also evenly divisible by 400, in which case they are leap years. This value is not the same as the actual number of seconds between the time and the Epoch, because of leap seconds and because system clocks are not required to be syn- chronized to a standard reference. The intention is that the interpretation of seconds since the Epoch values be consistent; see POSIX.1-2008 Rationale A.4.15 for further rationale. SEE ALSO
date(1), gettimeofday(2), ctime(3), ftime(3), time(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.53 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2011-09-09 TIME(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy