Sponsored Content
Special Forums Cybersecurity Web Hack Attempt from whois 209.126.68.6 Post 303026086 by Neo on Monday 19th of November 2018 11:08:11 PM
Old 11-20-2018
Note:

Code:
to:	        abuse@shinjiru.com.my, ipadmin@primary.net
date:	        Nov 20, 2018, 11:06 AM
subject:	Hacker / Attacker at IP addresses 209.126.68.6 and 111.90.158.225

Quote:
Hi.

We have firm evidence of someone at 209.126.68.6 attempting to execute malicious javascript code which downloads malware from 111.90.158.225.

Here is the log file entries (which we have blocked):
 

4 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

ar: 0707-126

Trying to build code on IBM_AIX 5.3. Following error occured during build. ar: 0707-126 $projdir/obj/ibm/5.3/NewApp/NewApp.o is not valid with the current object file mode. Use the -X option to specify the desired object mode. ANy help is appreciated to resolve the error. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: milindb
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Exit Status 126 - how to get rid of it

Hi All, I have a small application hosted on apache-tomcat 5. Basically its a html page which in turn calls a perl script residing on unix server. Through this perl script i am calling a shell script using system command , like system('scriptname.sh',arg1,arg2,arg3); Now in the script... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: glamo_2312
5 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

whois country help

Hello folks, I have list of ips like 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 3.3.3.3 4.4.4.4 whois 1.1.1.1 |grep -E 'country|Country' it show country=US or whatever. so i have number of ips in text file, how i can use above script to automate output like 1.1.1.1 US 2.2.2.2 CA 3.3.3.3 FR (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: learnbash
3 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

SFTP return Error Code 126

Hi, We are getting the following error code while connection remote server using sftp command. sftp user@serrver Warning: child process (/opt/ssh2/bin/ssh2) exited with code 126. pls Advise. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: koti_rama
2 Replies
AGGREGATE(1)						      General Commands Manual						      AGGREGATE(1)

NAME
aggregate - optimise a list of route prefixes to help make nice short filters SYNOPSIS
aggregate [-m max-length] [-o max-opt-length] [-p default-length] [-q] [-t] [-v] DESCRIPTION
Takes a list of prefixes in conventional format on stdin, and performs two optimisations to attempt to reduce the length of the prefix list. The first optimisation is to remove any supplied prefixes which are superfluous because they are already included in another supplied pre- fix. For example, 203.97.2.0/24 would be removed if 203.97.0.0/17 was also supplied. The second optimisation identifies adjacent prefixes that can be combined under a single, shorter-length prefix. For example, 203.97.2.0/24 and 203.97.3.0/24 can be combined into the single prefix 203.97.2.0/23. OPTIONS
-m max-length Sets the maximum prefix length for entries read from stdin max_length bits. The default is 32. Prefixes with longer lengths will be discarded prior to processing. -o max-opt-length Sets the maximum prefix length for optimisation to max-opt-length bits. The default is 32. Prefixes with longer lengths will not be subject to optimisation. -p default-length Sets the default prefix length. There is no default; without this option a prefix without a mask length is treated as invalid. Use -p 32 -m 32 -o 32 to aggregate a list of host routes specified as bare addresses, for example. -q Sets quiet mode -- instructs aggregate never to generate warning messages or other output on stderr. -t Silently truncate prefixes that seem to have an inconsistent prefix: e.g. an input prefix 203.97.2.226/24 would be truncated to 203.97.2.0/24. Without this option an input prefix 203.97.2.226/24 would not be accepted, and a warning about the inconsistent mask would be generated. -v Sets verbose mode. This changes the output format to display the source line number that the prefix was obtained from, together with a preceding "-" to indicate a route that can be suppressed, or a "+" to indicate a shorter-prefix aggregate that was added by aggre- gate as an adjacency optimisation. Note that verbose output continues even if -q is selected. DIAGNOSTICS
Aggregate exits 0 on success, and >0 if an error occurs. EXAMPLES
The following list of prefixes: 193.58.204.0/22 193.58.208.0/22 193.193.160.0/22 193.193.168.0/22 193.243.164.0/22 194.126.128.0/22 194.126.132.0/22 194.126.134.0/23 194.151.128.0/19 195.42.240.0/21 195.240.0.0/16 195.241.0.0/16 is optimised as followed by aggregate (output shown using the -v flag): aggregate: maximum prefix length permitted will be 24 [ 0] + 193.58.204.0/21 [ 1] - 193.58.204.0/22 [ 2] - 193.58.208.0/22 [ 3] 193.193.160.0/22 [ 4] 193.193.168.0/22 [ 5] 193.243.164.0/22 [ 0] + 194.126.128.0/21 [ 6] - 194.126.128.0/22 [ 7] - 194.126.132.0/22 [ 8] - 194.126.134.0/23 [ 9] 194.151.128.0/19 [ 10] 195.42.240.0/21 [ 0] + 195.240.0.0/15 [ 11] - 195.240.0.0/16 [ 12] - 195.241.0.0/16 Note that 193.58.204.0/22 and 193.58.208.0/22 were combined under the single prefix 193.58.204.0/21, and 194.126.134.0/23 was suppressed because it was included in 194.126.132.0/22. The number in square brackets at the beginning of each line indicates the original line num- ber, or zero for new prefixes that were introduced by aggregate. The output without the -v flag is as follows: 193.58.204.0/21 193.193.160.0/22 193.193.168.0/22 193.243.164.0/22 194.126.128.0/21 194.151.128.0/19 195.42.240.0/21 195.240.0.0/15 SEE ALSO
aggregate-ios(1) HISTORY
Aggregate was written by Joe Abley <jabley@mfnx.net>, and has been reasonably well tested. It is suitable for reducing customer prefix fil- ters for production use without extensive hand-proving of results. Autoconf bits were donated by Michael Shields <michael.shields@mfn.com>. The -t option was suggested by Robin Johnson <rob- bat2@fermi.orbis-terrarum.net>, and the treatment of leading zeros on octet parsing was changed following comments from Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de>. An early version of aggregate would attempt to combine adjacent prefixes regardless of whether the first prefix lay on an appropriate bit boundary or not (pointed out with great restraint by Robert Noland <rnoland@2hip.net>). BUGS
Common unix parsing of IPv4 addresses understands the representation of individual octets in octal or hexadecimal, following a "0" or "0x" prefix, respectively. That convention has been deliberately disabled here, since resources such as the IRR do not follow the convention, and confusion can result. For extremely sensitive applications, judicious use of the -v option together with a pencil and paper is probably advisable. Joe Abley 2001 November 2 AGGREGATE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy