09-08-2018
Quote:
Three days ago we received an expected notice from our long time data center that they were going dark on Sept 12th.
About one and a half hours ago, after three days of marathon work, I just cut over the unix.com to a new data center with a completely new OS and Ubuntu distribution.
It it more responsive now that a few days back.
Does it still make sense for you to be tied down to a private data center instead public cloud? I am curious.
5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Virtualization and Cloud Computing
Hear how the changing needs of massive scale-out computing is driving a transfomation in technology and learn how HP is supporting this new evolution of the web.
More... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Linux Bot
1 Replies
2. HP-UX
What are the server requirements, Software requirements, Network requirements etc,
Please help me.. as 'm new 'm unable to get things done @ my end alone.
Please refrain from typing subjects completely in upper case letters to get more attention, ty. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sounddappan
5 Replies
3. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi,
Please, i have a history of the state of each node in my data center. an history about the failure of my cluster (UN: node up, DN: node down).
Here is some lines of the history:
08:51:36 UN 127.0.0.1 08:51:36 UN 127.0.0.2 08:51:36 UN 127.0.0.3 08:53:50 DN 127.0.0.1 ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: chercheur111
6 Replies
4. What is on Your Mind?
Dear All,
There was a problem in the data center data, which caused the server to be unreachable for about an hour.
Server logs show the server did not crash or go down.
Hence, I assume there was a networking issue at the data center.
Still waiting for final word on what happened.
... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
4 Replies
5. What is on Your Mind?
There was a problem with our data center today, creating a site outage (server unreachable).
That problem has been resolved.
Basically, it seems to have been a socially engineered denial-of-service attack against UNIX.com; which I stopped as soon as I found out what the problem was.
Total... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT SUSE
time::seconds
Time::Seconds(3pm) Perl Programmers Reference Guide Time::Seconds(3pm)
NAME
Time::Seconds - a simple API to convert seconds to other date values
SYNOPSIS
use Time::Piece;
use Time::Seconds;
my $t = localtime;
$t += ONE_DAY;
my $t2 = localtime;
my $s = $t - $t2;
print "Difference is: ", $s->days, "
";
DESCRIPTION
This module is part of the Time::Piece distribution. It allows the user to find out the number of minutes, hours, days, weeks or years in a
given number of seconds. It is returned by Time::Piece when you delta two Time::Piece objects.
Time::Seconds also exports the following constants:
ONE_DAY
ONE_WEEK
ONE_HOUR
ONE_MINUTE
ONE_MONTH
ONE_YEAR
ONE_FINANCIAL_MONTH
LEAP_YEAR
NON_LEAP_YEAR
Since perl does not (yet?) support constant objects, these constants are in seconds only, so you cannot, for example, do this: "print
ONE_WEEK->minutes;"
METHODS
The following methods are available:
my $val = Time::Seconds->new(SECONDS)
$val->seconds;
$val->minutes;
$val->hours;
$val->days;
$val->weeks;
$val->months;
$val->financial_months; # 30 days
$val->years;
The methods make the assumption that there are 24 hours in a day, 7 days in a week, 365.24225 days in a year and 12 months in a year.
(from The Calendar FAQ at http://www.tondering.dk/claus/calendar.html)
AUTHOR
Matt Sergeant, matt@sergeant.org
Tobias Brox, tobiasb@tobiasb.funcom.com
BalieXXzs SzabieXX (dLux), dlux@kapu.hu
LICENSE
Please see Time::Piece for the license.
Bugs
Currently the methods aren't as efficient as they could be, for reasons of clarity. This is probably a bad idea.
perl v5.12.1 2010-04-26 Time::Seconds(3pm)