Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? RudiC reaches over 4000 thanks in 6 years. Post 303020221 by hicksd8 on Sunday 15th of July 2018 06:36:49 AM
Old 07-15-2018
Well just what an amazing contribution is that!!!

What a major asset to this community.

Congrats RudiC.
This User Gave Thanks to hicksd8 For This Post:
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

DLT 4000 drivers?

I am using a Quantum DLT 4000 tape drive on a PowerMac G4 with OS 10.1.5 I'd like to use the Terminal application, which is based on BSD 4.4, to see the tape drive and write backup tapes to it. First, is there a way to list all the devices attached to the computer? And secondly, is there a way... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: derekc132002
0 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Extendnet 4000 login Problem/Feature?

Hi there! I've been given a box that works as a DSL gateway/firewall running Extendnet 4000. Now, when logging in to the box through the web interface using default login (admin/admin) everything is fine. When I log in locally though, a wierd thing happens. My login seems to be successful,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: D-Lexy
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Unix Command to separate this years files and last years?

Hello - I have a folder that contains files from 2003 till 2010. I am trying to figure out a command that would seperate each years file and show me a count? Even if i can find a command that would give me year by year count, thats good enough too. Thanks (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: DallasT
8 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Split string after 4000 char

Hi everybody! I have a large comma separated text file. This file incluede some column which largest than 4000 character(this is not the last column). I tried with sed but i can't do it. I would like to split to 4000 char this column. Thank You for your help! for example: (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: snayper
5 Replies

5. What is on Your Mind?

Congrats to RudiC - 3000 Thanks!

Congratulations to RudiC for crossing the magic boundary of being thanked 3000 times! As someone who often has profited greatly from your insight i stand in awe before this achievement. Thank you for your ongoing dedication and thank you for your willingness to share your knowledge! bakunin ... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
15 Replies

6. What is on Your Mind?

Congratulations RudiC for completing 4000+ THANKS in forums.

Hello All forum members, I would like to take this opportunity to THANK RudiC for his tremendous achievement, guidance, help for helping in forums, let us join our hands together for his GREAT achievement :b: @Rudi sir, How are you sir? you ROCK, please keep up the great work sir :b: ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: RavinderSingh13
1 Replies

7. What is on Your Mind?

Don tops the 4000+ thanks...

Sometime today Don Cragun reached 4000+ thanks from different folks. Well done Don, I have learnt a lot from you and other guys on here. Big thanks from we who have benefitted from your expertise. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
6 Replies
funidx(7)							SAORD Documentation							 funidx(7)

NAME
Funidx - Using Indexes to Filter Rows in a Table SYNOPSIS
This document contains a summary of the user interface for filtering rows in binary tables with indexes. DESCRIPTION
Funtools Table Filtering allows rows in a table to be selected based on the values of one or more columns in the row. Because the actual filter code is compiled on the fly, it is very efficient. However, for very large files (hundreds of Mb or larger), evaluating the filter expression on each row can take a long time. Therefore, funtools supports index files for columns, which are used automatically during fil- tering to reduce dramatically the number of row evaluations performed. The speed increase for indexed filtering can be an order of magni- tude or more, depending on the size of the file. The funindex program creates an index on one or more columns in a binary table. For example, to create an index for the column pi in the file huge.fits, use: funindex huge.fits pi This will create an index named huge_pi.idx. When a filter expression is initialized for row evaluation, funtools looks for an index file for each column in the filter expression. If found, and if the file modification date of the index file is later than that of the data file, then the index will be used to reduce the number of rows that are evaluated in the filter. When Spatial Region Filtering is part of the expression, the columns associated with the region are checked for index files. If an index file is not available for a given column, then in general, all rows must be checked when that column is part of a filter expression. This is not true, however, when a non-indexed column is part of an AND expression. In this case, only the rows that pass the other part of the AND expression need to be checked. Thus, in some cases, filtering speed can increase significantly even if all columns are not indexed. Also note that certain types of filter expression syntax cannot make use of indices. For example, calling functions with column names as arguments implies that all rows must be checked against the function value. Once again, however, if this function is part of an AND expres- sion, then a significant improvement in speed still is possible if the other part of the AND expression is indexed. For example, note below the dramatic speedup in searching a 1 Gb file using an AND filter, even when one of the columns (pha) has no index: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 42.36u 13.07s 6:42.89 13.7% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: [INDEF] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxand(1): INDEF [IDX_OR_SORT] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 1.55u 0.37s 1:19.80 2.4% When all columns are indexed, the increase in speed can be even more dramatic: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 42.60u 12.63s 7:28.63 12.3% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: pi start=9473025,stop=9492240 => pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxor sort/merge: pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] [IDX_OR_SORT] idxmerge(5): [IDX_OR_SORT] pi[ROW] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 1.67u 0.30s 0:24.76 7.9% The miracle of indexed filtering (and indeed, of any indexing) is the speed of the binary search on the index, which is of order log2(n) instead of n. (The funtools binary search method is taken from http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/03/22/Binary, to whom grateful acknowledgement is made.) This means that the larger the file, the better the performance. Conversely, it also means that for small files, using an index (and the overhead involved) can slow filtering down somewhat. Our tests indicate that on a file containing a few tens of thousands of rows, indexed filtering can be 10 to 20 percent slower than non-indexed filtering. Of course, your mileage will vary with con- ditions (disk access speed, amount of available memory, process load, etc.) Any problem encountered during index processing will result in indexing being turned off, and replaced by filtering all rows. You can turn filtering off manually by setting the idx_activate variable to 0 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_ACTIVATE environment variable to 0 (in the global environment). Debugging output showing how the indexes are being processed can be displayed to stderr by setting the idx_debug variable to 1 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_DEBUG environment variable to 1 (in the global environment). Currently, indexed filtering only works with FITS binary tables and raw event files. It does not work with text files. This restriction might be removed in a future release. SEE ALSO
See funtools(7) for a list of Funtools help pages version 1.4.2 January 2, 2008 funidx(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy