01-09-2018
AIX 6.1, POWER5 and Spectre/Meltdown
Apologies for this newbie question. We have inherited an IBM p5 520 (9111-520) running AIX 6.1.0.0 which seems to be the base install and no further patches installed.
Is this vulnerable to the Spectre/Meltdown threat?
Are patches available?
Looks like AIX 6.1.0.0 went 'end of support' in April last year so are there even patches available for this new threat and can I get them for free or does the system need subscribing to IBM at a cost?
7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Filesystems, Disks and Memory
I had an issue with a second hard disk in my machine. I have a sparc station running solaris 7. It was working fine but now it wont mount on boot up and when you try to mount it manually it gives an I/O error. I tried a different disk as a control which was fine. What I want to know is if my... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Henrik
3 Replies
2. AIX
Hi all,
I have a AIX 5.3 Installation on the Power5 processor. I am using the knlist API for getting the details of the CPU details like user cpu, kernel cpu, idle cpu and wait cpu. My code is working fine on other Installations of AIX like PowerPC_POWER4 but it is giving wrong values on Power5... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajesht
0 Replies
3. AIX
I have a power5 that I would like to update and bring everything forward.
I am wondering about trouble-free upgrades. Is it better to go 5.3 -> 7 or 5.3 ->6 ->7?
The power5 box is behind and hopefully can learn from experiences here.
Thanks. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: redi
6 Replies
4. AIX
Hello,
What is wattage of POWER5+ 2.1Gz CPU ?
It's dual-core 90nm chip.
At least approximately ?
thanks,
Vilius (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vilius
1 Replies
5. AIX
Hello all, I am hoping someone can point me in the right direction here.
We had a machine running AIX 6.1 that someone completely corrupted, so we decided to re-load it from media. I was able to boot into DVD media, select options for complete (destructive) install, AIX standard, etc. The... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: JamesNJ
0 Replies
6. War Stories
Apologies if this is the wrong forum but...
...This is hard hitting stuff.
LKML: Linus Torvalds: Re: x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
5 Replies
7. What is on Your Mind?
This seems a bit serious:
Meltdown, Spectre: The password theft bugs at the heart of Intel CPUs • The Register
Vulnerability Note VU#584653 - CPU hardware vulnerable to side-channel attacks
Project Zero: Reading privileged memory with a side-channel (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Scrutinizer
8 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
stg-sink
STG-SINK(1) StGit Manual STG-SINK(1)
NAME
stg-sink - Send patches deeper down the stack
SYNOPSIS
stg sink [-t <target patch>] [-n] [<patches>]
DESCRIPTION
This is the opposite operation of linkstg:float[]: move the specified patches down the stack. It is for example useful to group stable
patches near the bottom of the stack, where they are less likely to be impacted by the push of another patch, and from where they can be
more easily committed or pushed.
If no patch is specified on command-line, the current patch gets sunk. By default patches are sunk to the bottom of the stack, but the --to
option allows to place them under any applied patch.
Sinking internally involves popping all patches (or all patches including <target patch>), then pushing the patches to sink, and then
(unless --nopush is also given) pushing back into place the formerly-applied patches.
OPTIONS
-n, --nopush
Do not push back on the stack the formerly-applied patches. Only the patches to sink are pushed.
-t TARGET, --to TARGET
Specify a target patch to place the patches below, instead of sinking them to the bottom of the stack.
-k, --keep
Keep the local changes.
STGIT
Part of the StGit suite - see linkman:stg[1]
StGit 03/13/2012 STG-SINK(1)